Talk:Langley, Washington

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Langley by the Sea?[edit]

I lived in Langley and not once did I ever hear it referred to as "Langley by the Sea." It's ridiculous. So I deleted it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Isoruku (talk • contribs) 03:22, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But langley is by the sea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.235.71.235 (talk) 14:31, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am a former member of the Langley Chamber of Commerce, and for some time the phrase "village by the sea" was used in marketing communications by the chamber and other organizations. The subtitle of the City Government's website is currently "The Village by the sea" ^[1] DionJohnstone (talk) 00:20, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www.langleywa.org

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Langley, Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:52, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Langley, Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discrepancy in total area[edit]

The "Geography" section states "the city has a total area of 1.08 square miles (2.80 sqkm), all of it land". The Infobox has 1.01 sq mi for the land area and includes some water area also. Could someone resolve this issue? Tagooty (talk) 16:10, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A further discrepancy: the 1st para in the lead section mentions 0.8 sq mi. Tagooty (talk) 04:44, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi b 46.188.186.72 (talk) 07:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.langleywa.org

[1]