Talk:Gold Reserve Act

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Which country does this act relate to? Deb 21:22, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

The United States Harksaw 18:45, 6 January 2006 (UTC)Harksaw[reply]

Actual Text of the Act?[edit]

This article needs a link to the Act itself, but I have been unable to locate it online. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.98.161.173 (talk) 09:26, 3 December 2011 (UTC) Found it: http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/classes/econ355/choi/1934jan30.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.98.161.173 (talk) 09:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gold Reserve Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Criticisms[edit]

It certainly wasn’t a universally popular idea at the time, and has more than a few critics today. I think in the name of fairness this demands a criticism section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donatj (talkcontribs) 12:08, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]