User talk:Simfish

Hi from Alphax[edit]

Hi Simfish,

That would be me, but I'm actually more from AoWH than Town's Crier. I don't have Autism or Aspergers, but my brain has some interesting abnormal functions that were (a long time ago) briefly labelled (probably incorrectly) as ADD.

Good to see you contributing to the greatest repository of human knowledge ever written - Alphax 07:22, Oct 1, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, Alphax! I see now. THough I sometimes cannot resist returning to AoKH. ;)

Simfish 00:59, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Uh...hi/welcome[edit]

_johnlee from OD here. Talk pages generally aren't used for blogs — they're a handy method of private messaging in the Wiki style. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! BTW, you can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Here are some things you can do to get started:

You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Fix spelling and grammar

More... • Learn how

Fix wikilinks

More... • Learn how

Update with new information

More... • Learn how

Expand short articles

More... • Learn how

Check and add references

More... • Learn how

Fix original research issues

More... • Learn how

Improve lead sections

More... • Learn how

Add an image

More... • Learn how

Translate and clean up

More... • Learn how

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

Again, welcome. Johnleemk | Talk 08:52, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the message johnlee! Just to let you know; I was actually trying to find a free blog host where users could reply to my comments. I found none, save for Xanga which frankly gives little privacy from classmates (I don't want classmates to see my blog!). And Wikipedia is perfect. I'm ascetic so fancy backgrounds don't matter to me.Simfish 01:43, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Ah; screw the blog. I just viewed your contributions and seen the "ready to delete" contribution for a user who abused Wikispace. And I shouldn't be abusing it. ;) I really shouldn't. I apologize.01:47, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Don't worry. We're generally tolerant of such things, provided you make decent contributions to Wikipedia, whether in helping to run it or just edit articles. What pisses most people off is when users who don't help out at all come and make Wikipedia their own little homepage. Otherwise, a blog here would generally be tolerated. Johnleemk | Talk 18:04, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)

I see.

24.16.83.131 21:36, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)

You might be interested by this. Johnleemk | Talk 10:14, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Thanks johnlee! Very much! Finally a group that understands who I actually am! Simfish 23:37, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Hi from Alphax[edit]

Hi Simfish,

That would be me, but I'm actually more from AoWH than Town's Crier. I don't have Autism or Aspergers, but my brain has some interesting abnormal functions that were (a long time ago) briefly labelled (probably incorrectly) as ADD.

Good to see you contributing to the greatest repository of human knowledge ever written - Alphax 07:22, Oct 1, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, Alphax! I see now. THough I sometimes cannot resist returning to AoKH. ;)

Simfish 00:59, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Some stylistic points[edit]

Hi!

I just want to comment on some matters of style..

First, Wikipedia uses Capitalization Sparingly. Article titles should only be capitalized if it consists of proper nouns. The same goes for section headings.

Secondly, always start section headings at ==Two levels==. Do not ==Use a colon:== at the end of headings.

Oh, and one more thing, please use the Preview button to view intermediate editing steps.

Thanks, — David Remahl 22:58, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the info, I am now putting them into account when creating any new articles. Simfish 00:59, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Guatemala[edit]

Are you the person who trashed Guatemala [1] this morning? ie 152.157.79.253, who has certainly been contributing to your user page, and appears, according to my IP locator, to be from a school in Everett, Washington. --SqueakBox 18:44, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)

No, I edit my page from my school without logging in. Simfish 02:04, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

So these Special:Contributions 152.157.79.253 are not yours then? Do they belong to someone else? Or are possibly some of them yours, and some belong to someone else? I appreciate school computers are shared. Anyway, given that this IP number is being used for vandalism I strongly advise you to sign in when you use that IP address. --SqueakBox 02:08, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)

No, I only edited my own user page from that IP address. Alright - I'll try to log in when editing my page from school in the future. Simfish 03:10, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Cheers, --SqueakBox 03:57, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)

UW Academy[edit]

I replied to your message on my talk. Christopherlin 23:54, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User:Johnleemk[edit]

I don't know if you noticed, but you put that hi on his userpage. Make sure you put communications on talk pages in the future. Some people don't like it. Happy editing! Mgm|^(talk) 01:07, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)

He said on his userpage that it was fine - and he wanted someone to put something there. So I made that comment. Simfish 01:10, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yo[edit]

Hey, simfish; are you an RSI05ers? In that case, drop me a line - I'm Jason Chu, RSI03, and an RSI'05 first-week TA.

Even if you're not, that's cool, too; good job on starting the RSI entry. I appreciate it. 216.158.31.195 19:56, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

No, I'm still too young for RSI. I was considering applying next year if I did not get accepted to an early entrance program. Simfish 23:27, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Even if you get accepted to an early entrance program, you can still get into RSI. One of my fellow RSI03ers attended MIT in the class of 2007. jglc | t | c 16:24, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oh, the problem is... that I'm going to university next year (I was planning on applying to RSI that year) through the early entrance program, thereby disqualifying me from RSI. The person you're speaking about went to RSI the summer before college, I would believe. Simfish 02:03, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Greetings[edit]

I couldn't help but notice your Random Notes for Self noone should look at. My recommendation is to create a sub user page like User:Simfish/Random notes and put your stuff there.

By the way, if that was you, adding the link, sorry, I reverted it. You should log in when editing your user page! Especially if you're on a school computer. ;-) Ambush Commander 21:30, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion - done. Sometimes I'm so excited to post something I forget to log on but that really isn't a great idea all of the time. Simfish 02:19, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

talk:Macaw[edit]

Be bold and fix it. *grins* - UtherSRG (talk) 23:54, August 18, 2005 (UTC)

re:Category:Wikipedians by D&D Alignment[edit]

I noticed you are categorized as a Wikipedian by alignment. If you are in to userboxes, there are now infoboxes available using a standard template. See the alignment category page for details. This is a copied announcement, please reply on My Talk Page or in the category talk if you have any questions. xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 18:52, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

SSP[edit]

We must Expand the SSP Article! --BorisFromStockdale 23:38, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AND I AM A SSP REJECTEE W00T Simfish 04:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Hgmain logo-l.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hgmain logo-l.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bestiege23 18:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Civility[edit]

Your recent edit summaries to Talking birds and Budgerigar appear to be uncivil. Please remain polite and professional in your edit summaries and comments. Thank you. --Ginkgo100^talk 00:50, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SMile[edit]

GreaterWikiholic has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

hi dear[edit]

76.109.103.252 (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

you make me proud :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.109.103.252 (talk) 19:54, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tony Attwood[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Tony Attwood. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Attwood. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:17, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Simmy![edit]

Hi I'm testing =)

InquilineKea (talk) 08:13, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Coldmoleculedeborah.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coldmoleculedeborah.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 09:42, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Marzluff[edit]

A tag has been placed on John Marzluff requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lemlinspire (talk) 04:02, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tapio Schneider[edit]

A tag has been placed on Tapio Schneider requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lemlinspire (talk) 04:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lee Kump[edit]

The article Lee Kump has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 03:47, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too many capitals[edit]

Please note that in section headings, such as Honors and awards or External links, one should not capitalize an initial letter merely because its in the heading. The first letter is capitalized (except in rare cases where there is some special reason not to do that) and subsequent initials are in lower case except when there is a special reason (such as a person's name) to use a capital. This is codified in WP:MOS. Michael Hardy (talk) 04:10, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lori Marino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blackfish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arlan Richardson[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Arlan Richardson, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.ouhsc.edu/roca/OurPeople/ArlanRichardson,PhD.aspx.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:57, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Judith Campisi[edit]

A tag has been placed on Judith Campisi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~HackedBotato ^{Chat with me ♽ Contribs} 14:44, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rafael de Cabo[edit]

Hello, Simfish. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Rafael de Cabo, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Rafael de Cabo to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Rberchie (talk) 14:48, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John M. Sedivy[edit]

Hello, Simfish. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, John M. Sedivy, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want John M. Sedivy to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Rberchie (talk) 14:50, 5 May 2015 (UTC) Hello the references you gave do not talk talk about him as a person but rather his works.--Rberchie (talk) 14:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

João Pedro de Magalhães

added a link pointing to George Church

Steven N. Austad

added a link pointing to Georgia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Parker Conrad[edit]

Hello Simfish,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Parker Conrad for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ormr2014 (talk) 21:44, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dean Simonton[edit]

Hello, Simfish. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Dean Simonton, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Dean Simonton to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Rberchie (talk) 11:04, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Cosmo (parrot)[edit]

Hi, I'm Ormr2014. Simfish, thanks for creating Cosmo (parrot)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Apparently, Cosmo is a bit of a celebrity and has been discussed in the news, scholarly articles and scientific journals. Please add more content and cite some of these sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Ormr2014 (talk) 02:49, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Phil Jaber[edit]

A tag has been placed on Phil Jaber requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Non-Dropframe _talk 05:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Phil Jaber, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Non-Dropframe _talk 05:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Maye Musk[edit]

A tag has been placed on Maye Musk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 16:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Errol Musk[edit]

A tag has been placed on Errol Musk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 16:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SimplyInsured[edit]

A tag has been placed on SimplyInsured requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:13, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SimplyInsured[edit]

Hello Simfish,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SimplyInsured for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 22:13, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Heap Analytics[edit]

A tag has been placed on Heap Analytics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:14, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Heap Analytics[edit]

Hello Simfish,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Heap Analytics for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 22:14, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jacked: The Outlaw Story of Grand Theft Auto

added links pointing to Grand Theft Auto and Jack Thompson

2,4,5-trihydroxyamphetamine

added a link pointing to MDA

Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future

added a link pointing to Tesla

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

302M (Wolf)

added a link pointing to National Geographic

Snootz Math Trek

added a link pointing to Theatrix

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jun Wang (scientist)[edit]

The article Jun Wang (scientist) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -=# Amos E Wolfe ^talk #=- 08:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lindy Li[edit]

The article Lindy Li has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable unless elected

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 06:39, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Norgay Montes for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Norgay Montes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norgay Montes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Savonneux (talk) 00:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Newcastle 85+ Study, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newcastle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jim "Pee Wee" Martin for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jim "Pee Wee" Martin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim "Pee Wee" Martin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 05:16, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ján Gerthofer[edit]

Hello Simfish,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ján Gerthofer for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Musa Talk 07:19, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gustav Francsi[edit]

Hello Simfish,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gustav Francsi for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Musa Talk 07:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Ján Režňák) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Ján Režňák, Simfish!

Wikipedia editor BeowulfBrower just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on BeowulfBrower's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Ways to improve Fraility index[edit]

Hi, I'm Jamesmcardle. Simfish, thanks for creating Fraility index!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This is a very worthwhile article, but is currently too short, with insufficient referencing.There are authoritative papers and research that may referenced in this article (e.g Age Ageing (2012) 41 (2): 142-147.doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr182)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. sinarau (talk) 08:43, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ján Režňák, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Front. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ján Gerthofer and Gustav Francsi[edit]

I've declined the speedy for both of those right now as I am not sure of the notability requirements. I have posted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Ján Gerthofer and. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:54, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Gustav Francsi[edit]

Hi, I'm Human3015. Simfish, thanks for creating Gustav Francsi!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Improve the article otherwise it will get nominated for Prod or WP:AFD. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Human3015^TALK 02:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ján Gerthofer[edit]

Hi, I'm Human3015. Simfish, thanks for creating Ján Gerthofer!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi, thanks for contributing to Wikipedia, but improve this article. You can translate it from here, another language Wikipedia. Otherwise article will get nominated for WP:AFD. I'm also marking this article as unreviewed.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Human3015^TALK 02:41, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Modafinil sulfone[edit]

Please add a source and category.Xx236 (talk) 06:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New video games articles[edit]

Video games usually require three in-depth reviews in order to pass the general notability guideline for their own standalone articles. (The vetted vg reliable sources custom Google search is a good place to start.) If you can't find three sources, the page will likely end up deleted down the road. – czar 14:20, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amphipols, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congeners. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction[edit]

The article Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no reason to think notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 01:25, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World[edit]

The article The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no reason to think notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 01:25, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Dear Simfish, thank you for your creation of Frank Albanese. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, Anupam^Talk 22:39, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Human Longevity, Inc[edit]

The article Human Longevity, Inc has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:52, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of biogerontologists, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Sinclair. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bill Bowes (venture capitalist)[edit]

Hello Simfish,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bill Bowes (venture capitalist) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Parrotz1461 (talk) 04:03, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Helen Hobbs[edit]

A tag has been placed on Helen Hobbs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

this is NOT an article!

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Natsume96 (talk) 10:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 993-994 carbon-14 spike, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Solar storm. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of J147[edit]

The article J147 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears too short and irrelevant

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Le Sanglier des Ardennes (talk) 07:35, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 28 November[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Timeline of Tesla Motors page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of Tesla Motors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tesla. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of LBT-3627[edit]

The article LBT-3627 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

inadequate sourcing to show importance

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 20:36, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of NE 130th Street (Link station)[edit]

Hello Simfish,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged NE 130th Street (Link station) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NeedAGoodUsername (talk) 01:52, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of online food delivery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sprig. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fructoselysine article[edit]

Just added some citations and extra info - hope that's OK. Blythwood (talk) 22:30, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dick Spady[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dick Spady requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Satdeep Gill (talk • contribs 02:32, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dragutin Ivanić[edit]

Hi, you recently created this article, but you sourced it to some sort of a personal website, which is by default not a reliable source. As it turns out, the claim it makes was actually entirely false. Please review WP:RS to avoid these kinds of mistakes in the future. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 17:34, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some advice[edit]

Hello! Thanks for your contributions. It seems you've been running into difficulty with some recent articles, stubs that on face value fail to adequately demonstrate notability. I believe much of this stems from your using in some cases only a single sentence for an article. While Wikipedia is a work in progress, time-consuming and effort-draining deletion attempts and discussions can be spared if article creators invest a bit more effort into clearly demonstrating notability right off the bat, i.e. instead of simply saying so and so is a person who did X, say clearly why he/she is famous or noteworthy (there is a difference between doing something and being known for doing something: focus on the latter). In other words, put some effort into it. Perhaps strive to write at least 5 sentences, and add at least five categories to each article you create, even stubs. Adding an appropriate stub tag and infobox would help articles develop faster as well. Without a good foundation (even if an incomplete stub) other editors may not always be able to improve your stubs before speedy deletion, which would be a shame if the subject is truly notable, and wastes everyone's time. All the best, --Animalparty! (talk) 20:24, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Case Against Education[edit]

The article The Case Against Education has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not to be published until 2017 -- not yet notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 21:16, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Age of Em[edit]

The article The Age of Em has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable book

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 11:20, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert Bilott[edit]

A tag has been placed on Robert Bilott requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gbawden (talk) 13:14, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Bilott for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Bilott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Bilott until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Inventology: How We Dream Up Things That Change the World[edit]

Hello Simfish,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Inventology: How We Dream Up Things That Change the World for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NeedAGoodUsername (talk) 00:16, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It[edit]

The article Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable book

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of Microsoft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of Justice. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard P. Von Herzen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WHOI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Archetype for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Archetype is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Archetype until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AdrianGamer (talk) 11:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Timeline of Intel

added links pointing to P6, Haswell and Nehalem

CrunchFund

added a link pointing to Patrick Gallagher

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Philodina acuticornis[edit]

Hello Simfish,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Philodina acuticornis for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NeedAGoodUsername (talk) 18:26, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Data Collective

added a link pointing to Uber

Initialized Capital

added a link pointing to Y Combinator

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Singularity Hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ellie from Quora has a question[edit]

Hi Simfish,

You have suddenly become very active on Wikipedia lately. Inquiring minds want to know why. Shouldn't you be overwhelmed with work for school stuff?

Also, why do you like to create stub articles but refuse to indicate that they are stubs using the category intended for such?

--FeralOink (talk) 10:28, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yvette Fay Francis-McBarnette[edit]

A tag has been placed on Yvette Fay Francis-McBarnette requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RES2773 (talk) 00:59, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of Instagram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Quarles. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of Dropbox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mailbox. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trifluoroketamine[edit]

The article Trifluoroketamine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, no reliable source coverage or Google Scholar results

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Everymorning (talk) 22:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

148th Avenue

added links pointing to Bellevue and Redmond

8th Street (Bellevue)

added a link pointing to Lake Hills

David Silver (programmer)

added a link pointing to Richard Sutton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Avondale Road[edit]

The article Avondale Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable suburban arterial. Lack of references specifically mentioning the road rather than neighborhoods and boundaries.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sounder Bruce 23:24, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 8th Street (Bellevue)[edit]

The article 8th Street (Bellevue) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable suburban arterial. Lack of references specifically mentioning the road rather than neighborhoods and boundaries.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sounder Bruce 23:25, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 148th Avenue[edit]

The article 148th Avenue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable suburban arterial. Lack of references specifically mentioning the road rather than neighborhoods and boundaries.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sounder Bruce 23:25, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bellevue-Redmond Road for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bellevue-Redmond Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bellevue-Redmond Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 09:51, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Timeline of Netflix[edit]

A tag has been placed on Timeline of Netflix requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 09:47, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pecos Junction (RTD)[edit]

No sources, no categories, hard to understand.Xx236 (talk) 12:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have done nothing to correct your text.Xx236 (talk) 06:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Timeline of WhatsApp[edit]

Hello Simfish,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Timeline of WhatsApp for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 01:45, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The text starts with ', why?Xx236 (talk) 06:56, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of Dropbox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Hansen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of secretaries[edit]

Hello, Simfish. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, List of secretaries, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xx236 (talk) 06:49, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Timeline of Valve Corporation[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Timeline of Valve Corporation, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Clubjustin ^Talkosphere 02:47, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timeline of Valve Corporation for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of Valve Corporation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Valve Corporation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 07:56, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Timeline of Twitch.tv[edit]

The article Timeline of Twitch.tv has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary timeline which simply states the events in the article Twitch.tv in chronological order. In the same boat at Timeline of Valve Corporation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:48, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Timeline of Xiaomi[edit]

The article Timeline of Xiaomi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary timeline which simply states the events in the article Xiaomi in chronological order. In the same boat at Timeline of Valve Corporation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:51, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Timeline of WhatsApp[edit]

The article Timeline of WhatsApp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary timeline which simply states the events in the article WhatsApp in chronological order. In the same boat at Timeline of Valve Corporation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:53, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timeline of Xiaomi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of Xiaomi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Xiaomi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:03, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this a bundled AfD nomination, and the nominator has also nominated 18 other articles there. From spot checks (I didn't check all 19), it appears you're the creator of all of them. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:46, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Imagine Earth[edit]

Hello, Simfish. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Imagine Earth".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. GamerPro64 00:09, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Ellenby has been nominated for Did You Know[edit]

Hello, Simfish. John Ellenby, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:00, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for John Ellenby[edit]

On 22 September 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Ellenby, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Grid Compass was allegedly designed to match the dimensions of the company founder John Ellenby's briefcase? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Ellenby. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John Ellenby), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Carl Howard Pforzheimer Jr) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Carl Howard Pforzheimer Jr, Simfish!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Gordon Hamilton (scientist)) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Gordon Hamilton (scientist), Simfish!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion as an article on the topic already exits[edit]

Proposed deletion of Massachusetts Marijuana Legalization Initiative, Question 4 (2016)‎[edit]

The article Massachusetts Marijuana Legalization Initiative, Question 4 (2016)‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Simfish. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Simfish. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jim O'Neill (investor)[edit]

The article Jim O'Neill (investor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Too soon. If/when he gets picked as FDA head, then a Wikipedia article may very well be appropriate, but not until then.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. IagoQnsi (talk) 22:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Faith Spotted Eagle; Robert Satiacum Jr. has been nominated for Did You Know[edit]

Hello, Simfish. Faith Spotted Eagle; Robert Satiacum Jr., an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tesla P40[edit]

The article Tesla P40 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable processor. No claim of significance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Dane ^talk 03:30, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mithril Capital Management[edit]

A tag has been placed on Mithril Capital Management, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 16:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Faith Spotted Eagle[edit]

On 15 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Faith Spotted Eagle, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Faith Spotted Eagle became the first Native American to receive a presidential electoral vote after Robert Satiacum Jr. cast a faithless vote for her during the 2016 United States election? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Faith Spotted Eagle), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede 66 12:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andrej Karpathy[edit]

A tag has been placed on Andrej Karpathy, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zafar (talk) 16:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chalk River Unidentified Deposits[edit]

The article Chalk River Unidentified Deposits has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Simply not notable - though if there was an article Crud (word) this would be a valid redirect there, with the associated ref which debunks the idea that "Chalk River..." was the origin of the term. But there's no such article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 08:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Faith Spotted Eagle for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Faith Spotted Eagle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faith Spotted Eagle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ValarianB (talk) 17:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Vipul's paid editing enterprise. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 16:24, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New thread Corporation timelines opened about SEO link insertion. - Bri (talk) 19:35, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Data Collective for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Data Collective is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data Collective until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 23:54, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timeline of Amazon.com for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of Amazon.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Amazon.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Exemplo347 (talk) 20:35, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Simfish: This AfD also includes a number of other articles you have created, bundled into a single deletion discussion. Please read the Article for Deletion discussion for the full list. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 20:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gordon Hamilton (scientist)[edit]

The article Gordon Hamilton (scientist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTOBITUARY and WP:BLPONEEVENT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Exemplo347 (talk) 21:02, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas C. Leonard[edit]

A tag has been placed on Thomas C. Leonard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Guy (Help!) 23:40, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Savage Lands[edit]

Hello, Simfish. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Savage Lands".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Exemplo347 (talk) 22:06, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Inside Philanthropy for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inside Philanthropy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inside Philanthropy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 15:52, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Simfish. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dick Churchill for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dick Churchill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick Churchill until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 20:26, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Tarbell for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Tarbell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Tarbell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Veggies (talk) 15:48, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Timeline of Twitch.tv[edit]

The article Timeline of Twitch.tv has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FeWorld (talk) 00:01, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brave (web browser) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brave (web browser) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brave (web browser) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep (talk) 14:22, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timeline of Square for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of Square is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Square until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:41, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Spatial transformer networks[edit]

A tag has been placed on Spatial transformer networks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ethanpet113 (talk) 18:15, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gustaf Arrhenius moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Gustaf Arrhenius, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 08:06, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Three-banded panther worm[edit]

A tag has been placed on Three-banded panther worm, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 05:18, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neville Bowker for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neville Bowker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neville Bowker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:39, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft[edit]

Do you plan to continue working on Draft:Gustaf Arrhenius? Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:26, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Gustaf Arrhenius[edit]

Hello, Simfish. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Gustaf Arrhenius.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:47, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul F Glenn[edit]

The article Paul F Glenn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul F Glenn for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul F Glenn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul F Glenn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:09, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NIA rhesus macaque calorie restriction study for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NIA rhesus macaque calorie restriction study is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NIA rhesus macaque calorie restriction study until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Jack (talk) 12:34, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zhong Lin Wang[edit]

A tag has been placed on Zhong Lin Wang, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 16:08, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dataclysm for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dataclysm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dataclysm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Iskandar323 (talk) 10:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Singularity Rising[edit]

The article Singularity Rising has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 04:59, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Inside Philanthropy for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inside Philanthropy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inside Philanthropy (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 04:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on N1-methyl-4-pyridone-3-carboxamide[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page N1-methyl-4-pyridone-3-carboxamide, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]