Talk:Information Processing Language

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I removed this because it needs some explanation. It could only be done using an emulator surely?

The most recent version of IPL still runs, today, on standard PC's.

( 16:08, 23 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Regarding the above, it would be useful to add information or links pointing to current implementations.

influence[edit]

it was one of inspirations for lisp : http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/lisp/node2.html ca1 (talk) 07:29, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Information Processing Language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:32, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only one in-line citation[edit]

Added the "More citations needed" template because there is just a single in-line citation. Would be great to have someone familiar with the sources help out. Trevor1324 (talk) 07:15, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]