Talk:MP3.com

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

History[edit]

True - we flipped the switch in November of 1997 - Greg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jouster555 (talkcontribs) 04:37, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

mp3.com wasn't founded in 1998. At the very minimum it was 1997, but I'm almost 100% certain that it was 1996 that they started. For references, check the wayback machine on archive.org

Current status[edit]

the MP3.com website seems to be up and running now?! olivier 10:33, Jun 17, 2004 (UTC)


Where is info about mp3.com today?

Perhaps this should titled mp3.com (former)

Or "Classic" or "Original"? Seriously, do the new version and the old version of MP3.com need an articles of their own? Or would it make more sense to have one article with a section for the original service and a section for the current one? -- Logotu 15:20, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Does anyone have an idea what CNET or Vivendi did with the huge collection of songs on their servers? It'd be interesting to find out what the legal status of these is. ralian 07:41, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. The licensing for the music did not include the ability for MP3.com to sell it to a 3rd party. Therefore it was all lost. Some artists opted into the Trusonic system, so when that small business unit was sold that music was saved. There is an entry in the wiki page about Trusonic partnering with Garageband to allow artists to retrieve the music they may have misplaced. Trusonic continues to play (and pay) these artists. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tsaavik (talkcontribs) 17:30, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Library of Alexander?[edit]

Seriously? 207.191.23.51 (talk) 19:28, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mp3rrrr.PNG[edit]

Image:Mp3rrrr.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mp3logoswoosh.gif[edit]

Image:Mp3logoswoosh.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on MP3.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MP3.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:37, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]