Talk:Powered paragliding

Re: combining "PPC" (powered parachute) and PPG "powered paragliding".

These are distinctly different activities with VERY little overlap in participants. It would be like combining windsurfing with sailboating -- they both have hulls and sails but are attract different people and have vastly different skill sets and equipment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paramotor (talk • contribs) 18:26, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: combinging "Paramotor" and "powered paragliding".

Paramotor is the device and powered paragliding (aka paramotoring) is the activity. I think they should remain two different entries.

Jeff Goin

How about some VidBits?[edit]

Gee, it sure would be cool to see a vidbit or two of this. Got one? To share?

Whats a "Vidbit"?

Here's a Vidbit link -- http://www.zippyvideos.com/6938514865712546/flyin_092/

Altitude[edit]

According the FAI website the Bear Grylls world record has yet to be recognized by the FAI. There is some issue with problems he had with his GPS which froze on the way down(leaving only photographic evidence that the feat was achieved), it takes longer to confirm an altitude record through these means so it may take some time for the FAI to recognize his achievment. So I suggest that we mention the record's current status and include the previous record. I just thought I'd ask what anyone else thought on the matter first as technically Grylls has the record and i wouldn't want to introduce incorrect information.Elmo 11:52, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Elmo. I'm no expert, but I thought an FAI representative needs to be present during the record attempt. I'm pretty sure that for sailplane flights, a representative checks the aircraft and the flight recorder (not just a gps, btw) immediately before and after the flight. I doubt Grylls and his expedition had an FAI representative with them, but the FAI may have granted an acception(?). The flight will probably stand as an unofficial record. Too bad about the everest thing though, he could have gotten the record at home... Lost Cause

tags[edit]

I think this is a nice article but it has places where it needs better footnoting and referencing to avoid the appearance of OR. I've read enough on the subject to know that its not OR and the parts that are referenced are referenced well. I don't know enough about the subject to risk messing it up by a bunch of edits to nonstandard referenced so I think the usual editors would do a better job than I would here.Trilobitealive (talk) 23:52, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Powered paragliding. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Aviation: Aircraft / Gliding

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.
	This article is supported by the gliding project.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:42, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why nothing about powered paragliding?[edit]

Duh. It seems typical Wikipediaians think "encyclopedic style," means dry and dusty. Hence all the articles like this.

But it does talk about paragliders, regs, & records, and all that dry dusty copy & paste "factual" stuff. Yippy. Please change the article content or title. Cheers!
--2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:C16D:7F97:1C4C:6D39 (talk) 01:00, 15 July 2018 (UTC)Doug Bashford[reply]

Hamas Oct 7 attack[edit]

Thank you for including the Hamas attack on Israel.