Talk:Grave Digger (monster truck)

Trucks Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of trucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TrucksWikipedia:WikiProject TrucksTemplate:WikiProject TrucksTrucks articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Motorsport Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Motorsport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Motorsport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MotorsportWikipedia:WikiProject MotorsportTemplate:WikiProject Motorsportmotorsport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Replacement article created in /temp Wikibofh 03:31, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Grave Digger lawsuit[edit]

Didn't some woman sue the Grave Digger owners when it drove over her arm. She won like 12 million dollars from it. This article reads like PR from the Grave Digger people. Please fix this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.193.152.54 (talk) 19:20, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. Grave Digger #12 tipped over upside down while giving rides. The woman's arm was crushed in the accident. KrazyKong (talk) 03:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Number 11, not 12. 12 wasn't a ride truck. oknazevad (talk) 04:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I meant #11 not 12. Idk why I said 12. Anyway, there's a page on the monster trucks wiki that describes the incident and shows photos of it KrazyKong (talk) 05:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article Grading[edit]

Can someone grade this article in our subgroups? I'm a contributor so I'm not sure if I am allowed to rate it or not. I feel like it's become more neutral and want to make sure it is heading in the right direction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinylorchids (talk • contribs) 19:55, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've rated it as Start class only because it needs more references. With more references, this is easily B-class. Naturally, Grave Digger should be Top Importance within the project considering its importance within this particular motorsport. -- Guroadrunner (talk) 02:45, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Trivia?[edit]

In that this section has absolutely nothing to do with GD specifically, should it not be deleted?MichaelProcton (talk) 15:58, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grave Digger (truck). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080926004414/http://www.feldentertainment.com/press/ContentDisplay.aspx?id=14542 to http://www.feldentertainment.com/press/ContentDisplay.aspx?id=14542

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:06, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]