Talk:List of memory biases

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles

Cognitive science Unassessed (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of List of memory biases was merged into List of cognitive biases with this edit on 10:50, 10 December 2021. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Origin[edit]

What is the origin of this list? Can you cite references? Mr. Jones 12:53, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This list should either be improved to add short descriptions and/or merged onto the memory bias article or maybe the list of cognitive biases article. Headlouse 01:39, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Is this article in violation of WP:NOT#DIR?[edit]

Can this information be expressed in more of an encyclopedic fashion, and less like a list? -- weirdoactor ^t^|^c 21:06, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're right: this article should probably be moved to Memory bias (which will require administrative intervention, as Memory bias has history from before it became a redirect to List of memory biases) and made more like a normal article. (Lists aren't inherently bad, but in this case there doesn't seem to be any advantage of alphabetical-list over some sort of structured-and-weighted article.) —Ruakh_TALK 21:48, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained[edit]

The "Lag effect," "List-length effect," and "Processing difficulty effect" are not explained in the article, nor do they link to anything to explain them. What are they? Dude1818 (talk) 04:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It has been suggested that List of memory biases be merged into List of cognitive biases[edit]

Support - makes perfect sense, can't think why this has been outstanding since August! Pesky (talk …stalk!) 13:43, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - the list of cognitive biases is going to be renamed "List of biases in judgement and decision making". I think there's a case for memory as a separate category. MartinPoulter (talk) 21:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Placement effect and Subadditivity effect[edit]

These are well established as biases of judgement, but I don't recall seeing these being described as memory biases. Can we please have quotes from the sources that establish them specifically as memory biases? MartinPoulter (talk) 21:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wine tasting biases[edit]

I'm not an expert, but should any food or beverage tasting biases be added as examples to this article? Such as color biases or geographic origin bias for wine tasting? There are similar biases for beer and food. see Wine tasting#Blind tasting for examples. If yes, then please add to this article. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 11:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of memory biases. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110124181254/http://www.apa.org:80/journals/releases/gpr72203.pdf to http://www.apa.org/journals/releases/gpr72203.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:27, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

False Memory[edit]

False memory ought to be in the see also section. With the popularity of the "Mandela Effect" in popular culture it seems like it belongs somewhere on this page. It's certainly related. (This is my first time editing Wikipedia so I'm nervous to actually do it myself, in case it doesn't belong.) 67.141.61.118 (talk) 16:17, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]