Talk:Pollyanna

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Novels High‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has an infobox template in need of a Cover! (prefer 1st edition)

Film

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Women's History C‑class Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Polish content[edit]

This needs to be moved to the Polish (I think) Wikipedia if not already present there. --Robert Merkel 00:32, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[[pl:Pollyanna jest tytułową bohaterką klasycznej powieści dla dziewcząt autorstwa Eleanor H. Porter oraz jej sequelu pt. "Pollyanna dorasta".

Jest to historia jedenastoletniej dziewczynki, która po śmierci ojca zostaje odesłana, by mieszkać z surową i despotyczną ciotką, której boi się całe miasto. Pogodna i radosna dziewczynka jednak stopniowo to zmienia.
Książka była wielokrotnie filmowana, z czego najbardziej znaną jest wersja wytwórnii Disneya z Hayley Mills w roli głównej.

Pollyanna, to również synonim osoby pogodnej, radosnej, z optymizmem podchodzącej do życia.

Kategoria:Postacie fikcyjne Kategoria:Utwory literackie Kategoria:Film pl:Pollyanna

Other Adaptations[edit]

I remember a TV Movie adaptation of Polyanna starring Keisha Knight-Pullam who brings together a racially segregated town. It also had a sequel. I think it was produced by Disney. I believe it was in the late 1980s or early 1990s. Anyone have more info? -- BlueNight 13 Aug 2005

Pollyanna gift exchange[edit]

I have recently become familiar with a Pennsylvania (and surrounding area) colloquialism. "Pollyanna" is used to describe a one-for-one gift exchange, as a 'Secret Santa'. I have also encountered the term "Chinese Pollyanna" used to describe a similar gift exchange where numbers are drawn at random to determine the order of selection.

Per this article http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-pol2.htm, it appears to have derived its usage after the publication of the Pollyanna books, used originally as "Pollyanna gift exchange". Anyone with additional information, please share it. Wpjonathan 18:50, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

After sourcing many of the statements without citations under 'Influences' today, I couldn't find one for this PA local usage, other than the WorldWideWords page mentioned above. If the Dictionary of American Regional English still holds the referred-to material, it'll take someone with a subscription to find it. Anyone here paid up to DARE? Humboles (talk) 15:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Death Comes Unexpectedly[edit]

The sermon preached by Pastor Ford in Pollyanna, titled "Death Comes Unexpectedly". Was it written as an original for the film? or was it taken from a real-life hell, fire, and brimstone preacher such as Jonathan Edwards? It certainly could be Edwards!

Does anyone know the source?

It's the mirrors[edit]

In the recent commercial advertising campaign for the Texas Instruments DLP [1] televisions, the "It's the mirrors" scene is used. In fact, the line has been officially adopted as the tag line for the advertising campaign.

What the heck does that mean? The word mirrors appears nowhere in the article. 64.40.47.25 19:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some {fact} tagging --my bad[edit]

Rewriting, refactoring and extending the article, I had need of some PLACE names I no longer have ready to hand. I've tagged at least three places with {{fact}} where these guess should be put on firmer ground. Forgive, it's probably been 35 years since reading this gem. Cheers // FrankB 16:48, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To Thegingerone, Quit Adding Bias Information[edit]

No, Pollyanna was not the film that was the major turning point in Pickford's career. She was the star of many other successful films before this one, and was recognized as "America's Sweetheart" by the time World War I began. Newsflash, you appear to think your always right when you're not. Wikipedia is not the place to flash your ego.

Actually if you come off your high horse for a minute you would see that he said it was a defining point not a turning point. [1] Please stop making personal attacks. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 20:38, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Read it better Ms. Knott, it said THE defining point.Kevin j (talk) 23:38, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No it said "Mary Pickford's 1920 adaption defined her career." And you said this was vandalism. Plus the only reason you are even on this page is because you followed Thegingerone here. Stop it. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 05:52, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Im not even replying to him on this. Anyone would know that this was one of Mary's 'little girl' pictures that really defined her. However this isnt a Pickford article so really is there a need to elaborate? Vandalisim my foot--Thegingerone (talk) 01:48, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, she played these roles earlier too and this wasn't "the" defining moment in her career. Maybe it helped make her a top star at her jointly owned film company United Artists, but it wasn't "the defining moment of her career." Like you told me earlier, read a book. I'm not stalking anybody. Though I haven't mentioned it in my talk page I love to organize articles pertaining to film history, and I am an official member of WikiProjectFilmsKevin j (talk) 20:13, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See your reading too much into my words. I know Mary did little girl roles long before Pollyanna. However Pollyanna was her first film at United Artists; and it was a MAJOR success...this was the height of her fame right there. Today its one of the best examples of her little girl role; and many biographers would note as such. I love Pickford; I dont just make things up about her...--Thegingerone (talk) 03:32, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One of my biggest problem with calling this a defining role for Pickford is that her article doesn't even mention the Pollyanna film. The other problem is that all of this could be settled by a source being added that supports the contention that it helped define her. I have to say I don't agree with the statement that this was the height of her fame. Her article points to that as starting in 1914, and specifically discusses her appearance in 1914's Tess of the Storm Country. As far as it helped make her a top star" at UA, that isn't true either. Her status as top star was well established, both before and by helping form UA. What her article on PBS.org says about Pollyanna is that it "further solidified the little girl persona Pickford's fans loved." So no, it's not a defining role. Having said that, this argument over all these articles is getting ridiculous. Wildhartlivie (talk) 06:46, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I feel the Pickford article needs some revisions but I havent had the time. I tried to reword it to match the source. It didnt make her a top star at UA; just this period in her career was her height (she had already been very famous and would continue to be but this is when it was really reaaaallly high; along with her marriage to Fairbanks). Hopefully that helps settle it a little with the source and rewording; I didnt think it was that major of a deal as everything I read said the same thing I wrote. It was an after thought to the movie article really.--Thegingerone (talk) 06:51, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The source does not use the word define in any way. I think you need to let go of that word in regard to this film. The source said "further solidified." I've removed the fluffery from that paragraph altogether. It really isn't needed in regard to either Pickford or Mills. Wildhartlivie (talk) 06:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Its not her article anyways so I guess it doesnt matter.--Thegingerone (talk) 07:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pollyanna doesn't fall from a tree, she's hit by a car - at least in the book anyway, which is what the plot summary is - I would hope - supposed to summarise. It's correct later down the page, but not in the summary.

Paperbacked. 92.20.197.140 (talk) 18:09, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy-Go-Lucky[edit]

Poppy in Mike Leigh's film Happy Go Lucky is not a modern incarnation of the Pollyanna character. Leigh denies this interpretation outright around 4:55 in this youtube video. As such I'm removing this reference.--71.8.78.170 (talk) 05:02, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Pollyanna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That’s good 204.147.180.89 (talk) 01:47, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]