Talk:VG (nerve agent)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

The sentence:

It is quite possible that one of these second generation V series agents has been deployed against hostile forces.

says nothing. It's also quite possible that they've never been deployed; it's also quite possible they've been deployed against friendly forces. Absent any information or evidence about actual use, the reader has nothing to judge, and the statement adds nothing to the content of the article.

Also, the commentary about V-weapon developments in the USSR are misleading. The V-series (VE,VG,..VX) are western.

  • The above comments (by other people) refer to a section which I have just removed. The information on Soviet chemical weapons development seemed largely irrelevent to this article, apart from being speculative, confusing and unsourced. Jll 15:32, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Soviet Union produced (and weaponized) tens of thousands of metric tons of the agent VR (R-33, "Russian VX") during the Cold War. So, "the V-series (VE,VG,..VX) are not quite exclusively western". Any conception, that a major discovery in the field of substance-classes toxicology could be kept "secret" by just not revealing the research to another party is nonsense. What one chemist/toxicologist discovers, can be "rediscovered" by any other peer somewhere else in close time, as the history of science shows.--84.163.115.170 (talk) 03:13, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where on Earth did they use this as an insecticide?[edit]

This article says that a substance as toxic as sarin was used as an insecticide? I wish someone would explain how this was possibly done. Were people spraying fields with this stuff?

Oh, and if there were civilian users fooling around with this stuff - did they get Gulf War Syndrome?! Wnt (talk) 22:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on VG (nerve agent). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]