Talk:Penile subincision

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Duplicate: Penile Subincision[edit]

Sorry, I've just created a duplicate under the heading "Penile Subincision", I'll try to sort out soon (if no-one else does it before). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yerrux (talkcontribs) 15:34, 31 March 2005

The picture appears to be a meatotomy or a superincision, not a subincision. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.2.202.142 (talk) 00:42, 20 October 2006


TfD nomination of Template:Linkimage[edit]

Template:Linkimage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 00:08, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photo desperately required[edit]

There is no longer an image on this page. And if any article cries out for one, tis is it. 71.118.61.10 (talk) 06:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Damin[edit]

The statement about Damin in the "Cultural Traditions" section seems to be off. It seems like everyone contributing to the Damin page agrees that Damin was a very simple language with a very small, yet intense lexicon, and therefore seems like it was not complex at all. Some men, according to the page, in fact learned to speak it with a relative fluency in one ceremonial session. This seems like a simple language, not a complex one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dantiston (talkcontribs) 22:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bmezine link[edit]

The bmezine entry in External Links does not go to specific information about sub-incisions, but to a general index saying that the site has been reorganized. If you click the sub-incision entry there, you get a page inviting you to upgrade your membership to see thousands of photos and videos. I would love to have one photo or drawing here in the Wikipedia article, but this seems like a spamlink. Should we remove it? Peter Chastain (talk) 08:56, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Toggle[edit]

I think we should add a toggle for seeing the article's main picture, defaulted to off, but those who wish to see it can click "show". Can this be done? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.128.42.6 (talk) 04:00, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article Title[edit]

Why is this under "penile subincision" (with a redirect from "subincision")? The common name (well, as common as it can be) is "subincision", and there's no other kind of subincision from which it needs to be differentiated.

Given that other than the title and intro sentence, the entire article refers to it as simply "subincision", I propose that the page be moved to "subinicision". -- 77.58.32.77 (talk) 13:18, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Penile subincision. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Penile subincision. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image not showing: "Full subincision.jpg"[edit]

I've made an edit to remove an image that refuses to show. I've also removed the same image from the page "Genital modification and mutilation". I tried to fix it but couldn't. Looking at the image page and its page on Wikimedia Commons, I don't see any indication that it's restricted. It's on the Bad image list, but I don't see any instructions about fixing it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by W.andrea (talkcontribs) 19:55, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:07, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]