Talk:WHSmith

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments[edit]

About my "massive rewrite": firstly, I have tried to consistenly use "it" and the singular for the company throughout (I think I broke down towards the end). This isn't to everyone's taste, so I'm sorry if you don't like it. Secondly, two factoids from the previous article didn't make it in, because they seemed trivial to me:

The W H Smith staff journal, Newsbasket, was published between 1908 and 1978, and provides an interesting business and social history of the firm at that time.

This seemed potentially interesting, but I'm not sure how easy it is to refer to copies of this internal publication. In taking it out I have orphaned the Newsbasket article; maybe it should go back in as a "see also", but I'm not sure.

A W H Smith newsletter for the third age, Primetime was published from January 1995 to April 1996 and was edited by David Alston.

This lasted less than a year and was only a "newsletter", not even a magazine. The link to Primetime led to another topic altogether, anyway.

I may also have wandered into POV in my assessment of the offerings at W H Smith. Be bold if you disagree. --rbrwr± 17:50, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Error: Origins of the company[edit]

I don't have the correct information, but the opening of the "History" section must be incorrect, as Euston station was not built until the 19th century, and passenger rail travel had not been invented in 1792. Ephialtes (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:27, 28 May 2010 (UTC).[reply]

WHSmith[edit]

I can't see why this article is "W H Smith" rather than "WHSmith" which is the name in the format currently used by the company. Are there any objections to the article being moved? (and yes, I do know the variants are re-directs, and maybe it isn't over important) UkPaolo 20:28, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

WHSmith does seem to make sense, but I don't feel particularly strongly about it. I would note that they brand their shops WHSmith, but refer to the company as WH Smith plc (with a space between H and S).
By the way, here's a list of variants (rescued from my sandbox) that I used when I was setting up those redirects (for some reason I couldn't be bothered to do them all). --rbrwr± 20:45, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Nobody gives a flying fuck if *you* feel strongly about it, jackass. That's the way *they* write their name and *they* feel really strong about it. Jesus H Fucking Christ, what a bunch of morons from the US. Check their website. It says WH Smith PLC in the title tag. That good enough for you, you moron?

Partial rewrite[edit]

I've done a partial rewrite of the introductory section of the article. I've added new headings, which can hopefully be expanded further to explain the current operations of the company (the article as it stands seems largely focused on the history, and I'm not sure gets across the nature of WHSmith stores for people not from the UK who may not be familiar with them). UkPaolo 21:31, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

correct title[edit]

I work for WHSmith Retail so I have to deal with the guff that comes in and out of the shop on a daily basis.

Despite mail coming addressed to "WHSmith", "WH Smith", "W H Smith", "W.H.Smith", and vaients of that using Smiths as well as John Menzies the official names are as follows.

WH Smith PLC WHSmith Everything Else

Therefore I would suggest using WH Smith as the artcicle refers to the company as a whole.


Regarding the newsletters - they've been superceeded by ad-hoc communication on the company intranet.


81.178.236.108 16:24, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]


  • I work for WHS too, and per my section above would favour a move to "WHSmith". UkPaolo 19:10, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Move it then. Skinnyweed 12:56, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
But it is clear from the above msg that at least someone else would disagree with this title. It certainly wouldn't appear there's any consensus for a move, despite my personal preference. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 19:05, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, they have been branded WHSmith since the 1990s at least. Can someone move it? 86.131.98.77 (talk) 22:06, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Smith's in Scotland, Menzies in England[edit]

A few questions, since I was adding a bit to the article:-

  • Prior to the late-1990s (or mid-1990s), did W H Smith have any large ("high street") stores in Scotland?
  • Ditto the small railway stores- I'm pretty sure I saw some there, but I may be wrong.
  • How dominant was John Menzies in the UK-wide "railway station" market?
  • Did Menzies have any large-format stores outside Scotland?

Fourohfour 12:21, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The Menzies stores in England that WHS took on did include High street branches, but they tended to be small suburban branches as far as I can tell (all the English ex-Menzies that are part of the estate now that I can think of off the top of my head are in small towns).

  • My own question:

Anything about the takeover or merger of Preedy's/Preedies in the 80s/90s anywhere? Since I know of several ex-Preedy now WHS (with staff who were Preedy staff) --Lazaqat 20:53, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: the inversion of Private Eye magazine in branches of W H Smith[edit]

Hi UKPaolo, Just FYI I discussed the frequent inversion of Private Eye recently with a friend who works at W H Smith, and he admitted it is an internal cultural thing, and tacitly encouraged by some members of senior management. I think I saw someone else comment about it somewhere on the web a year or two ago, if I find the link I will throw it your way for your consideration. Sjc 05:24, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I find that most interesting... I have worked at a management level in several branches of WHS, and have never come accross such a concept. I'm aware many magazines are distributed to the stores with half of them upside down (so as to level out the pile with spines on alternating sides) and frequently put out on the shelves like that, which can lead to magazines left displaying the wrong way up. When I saw your remark, if I'm honest, I assumed it to be little more than the case that you'd noticed Private Eye upside down on a few occasions and read more into it than just chance. If there is something more behind it then I've never come across it, and am most interested to learn of the idea — if you do have such a link please do forward it my way! Even if seemingly true in a number of stores, I do have my doubts about the relevance or encyclopedic content of such a statement, but I shall understand if you wish to re-add it to the article and leave it be. Cheers for your explanation, └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 07:59, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have a spider running now using the Google API. I have moved this to the talk page of the WHS article in the meantime where I think it probably rightfully belongs. Your suggestion that it may be haphazard or related to the spines being levelled out is intriguing, but my curiosity was piqued by the fact that it is almost invariably Private Eye which is upside down, particulalry given the nature of the history between Private Eye and WHS! Sjc 08:12, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Most magazines at some point during the week end up upside down as they come in like that to level off the spines. As they remain on the shelves the other edge of them "flomps" downwards making the magazine look untidy so there is essentially a "stock rotation" where the magazines at the back are turned upsidedown to counteract this problem.

Sound FX[edit]

Prior to buying the Our Price chain, Smith's owned Sound FX, a record store which was merged with Our Price in 1986. Nothing about Sound FX is mentioned here. I can't add anything as I have looked high and low for information... anyone able to add anything? 205.188.117.71 22:16, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The article did state that the old box-shaped logo was used until 2004 (I have changed this). I know – and I'm sure most others can remember this – that the old logo was actually dropped in the early- or mid nineties, but I don't know which year. Can anyone help? — Stonefield 21:52, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fairly sure that the new Cambridge store in 1999 opened with the old logos, but not for long before it was changed. King Rikk (talk) 20:05, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like I might be wrong, as this image suggests the new branding was in use in May 1999. http://www.rebuildingmanchester.co.uk/index.php?option=com_flickurpicpro&Itemid=87&Set=72157606644931254# King Rikk (talk) 11:56, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cut-and-paste Page Move: Reversion[edit]

Regarding the move from W H Smith to WHSmith; this has been reverted. This wasn't due the name chosen (an important, but entirely separate issue; see below). It was because the move used cut-and-paste; losing the edit history- discourteous to contributors, as well as breaking the GFDL.

I know that it's not possible to properly move the page (without Admin powers) because WHSmith is an existing article. However, cut-and-paste moves are bad, full stop.

(I should make clear that the move was- apparently- carried out in good faith, and that the editor was a relative newcomer, so no hard feelings or blame intended towards them. Sorry if this came across as a lecture.)

Fourohfour 14:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page title[edit]

Since I had to deal with the page move reversion anyway, we may as well discuss whether the page move was a good idea (even if it was executed badly).

There may be a case in favour if "WHSmith" reflects an actual official company name change and/or W H Smith are making a big deal about this rebranding.

On the other hand, if the removal of spacing simply reflects a minor stylistic issue over how Smiths wish their existing name to be presented, then (IMHO) leave the page where it is. Moving it for the sake of some over-extrapolated (if not misleading) pseudo-precision would be utterly pointless; just another form of wiki-masturbation that requires more link-maintenance.

Fourohfour 14:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IMPORTANT: It still requires moving. They have used "WHSmith" as their brand for many years now, perhaps a decade or more. It certainly follows wiki precedent: many bands, albums, products, etc. are listed with strange stylistic capitals. Hell, there's even brian d foy. 86.164.246.89 (talk) 21:25, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Former imposition of content restrictions on UK publishers[edit]

In the article App Store, it the following quote in reference to WH Switch is include: "The Guardian described censorship of explicit content by Apple as analogous to that of the distributor WH Smith, a main distributor which for many years imposed content restrictions on British publishers." but when I came over to this article I found nothing on this former practice BY WH Smith. Something should be include in this article on about the former practice by WH Smith of forcing content restrictions on UK mags they sold. --Cab88 (talk) 10:46, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested Move (22 May 2014)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:53, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

W H Smith → WHSmith – The company themselves no longer format their official title with spaces ("W H Smith"), they have used "WHSmith "for over a decade. Please see their website, this shows their logo stating "WHSmith" and the copyrighted title "WHSmith" at the bottom of the page. Limbsaw ~talk~ 13:43, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - I've often wondered why this article was named W H Smith as opposed to WHSmith, It seems some papers still use it [1] [2] [3] [4] but to be honest per COMMONNAME I say move. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 14:16, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - @Davey2010: I agree. I actually work for Smiths myself, and we all use WHSmith on official documents, return & delivery papers etc... and we all find it rather annoying when people format our name wrong... it used to be WH Smith, then W H Smith, and now its been WHSmith for over a decade. That's why we need to move the article, it is confusing - wikipedia should be a correct source; when people search for WHSmith on here and they see W H Smith, no wonder papers and other sources use the spaced format of the name. Plus all store signs state "WHSmith" with no spacing as well! --Limbsaw ~talk~ 14:45, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:17, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:07, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - per nom. Unreal7 (talk) 23:55, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Australian Stores[edit]

Regarding the 'International' section: The part about Australian stores only talks about 7 in Melbourne and leaves out the (many) other stores across the country.

I have tried to re-word it as best as I can, but I can't get it to make sense - maybe somebody else could have a try? If you do, there is a list of Australian (and other Int'l stores) in this document by WHSmith themselves: http://www.whsmithplc.co.uk/docs/International_Store_Contact_Details_3.pdf

Yoyosamo (talk) 11:17, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I hope that posting here was the right thing to do, I want to make the AU section be 'all inclusive' but didn't want to ruin the flow of the page - I am only new to this so I apologise if I shouldn't have posted here ;)

@Yoyosamo:
You posted exactly in the right place! I'll see what I can do in my Sandbox. I'm employed with WHS in England, so I think I should find it easier than anyone else... Regarding the stores in Aus... Do you maybe have any copyright free images of stores in Aus? Or any other information that isn't included on the WHS website? Does the WHS Aus have a website? etc.. just general stuff like that.
Thanks --Limbsaw ~talk~ 19:40, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on WHSmith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:WHSmith&oldid=1210611554"