Talk:Tupelo Honey

Tupelo Honey has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 21, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Northern Ireland Low‑importance

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tupelo Honey/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Adabow(complain) 10:12, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

The infobox has recording details, yet these are long-winded and somewhat confusing. Please rewrite these clearly and concisely.
- I've changed the recording dates to the style that's in Achtung Baby, an FA. Kitchen Roll (Exchange words) 11:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Do not mention the B-sides of the singles in the infobox
  - Removed Kitchen Roll (Exchange words) 11:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have made some minor copy-editing changes in the 'Background' and 'Recording' sections to help the flow of prose
'Release' section: there is a lot of missing information here, such as record label, release dates and formats.
- Added record label and release date. Isn't it obvious that it was an LP? Kitchen Roll (Exchange words) 11:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Mention it anyway, as cassette tapes came out around then Adabow(complain) 21:23, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- "Tupelo Honey reached number 27 on the Billboard charts", do you specifically mean the Billboard 200?
  - Changed Kitchen Roll (Exchange words) 11:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
First paragraph of 'Aftermath' section seems a bit PoV, and may need rewording, using quotations, or additional references. Also second sentence should be reworded so that it doesn't start with 'but'.
- Agadant will have to look at that - I don't own the Hage book. Kitchen Roll (Exchange words) 11:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Agadant seems not to be editing at the moment, so I've hiden the paragraph from view, so it can be fixed at a later date - I'll leave a message on Agadant's talk page. Kitchen Roll (Exchange words) 14:50, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have replaced the level three headers in the 'Track listing' section with bold lines
'Personnel' section needs a source
- Added source for "Production". The musicians are referencd in the "Recording section". Kitchen Roll (Exchange words) 11:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In the 'Charts' section there are not several charts, so reorganise this information as prose, rather than tables.
- See The Freewheelin' Bob Dylan, an FA, which uses the same format. Kitchen Roll (Exchange words)
- ""(Straight to Your Heart) Like a Cannonball" was the third single from the album and only reached number 119 on the American charts." Again, specify which chart
  - This would be the Billboard Hot 100, but this makes no sense as it charted at #119, which is more than 100, so I'm not sure about this. Kitchen Roll (Exchange words) 11:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - I thought it might be the Top Heatseekers chart, but that was only introduced in 1993 (apparently) Adabow(complain) 21:23, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      - I reworded it so it says it charted outside the Hot 100 at number 119, which makes more sense. Kitchen Roll (Exchange words) 14:50, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are some minor issues that need to be addressed. I will out the review on hold, and allow seven days for relevant changes to be made. Good luck improving the article! Adabow(complain) 10:12, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I guess everything is satisfied now - just make sure that the now-hidden paragraph is followed up on. Adabow(complain) 06:57, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've restated it using a direct quotation. Agadant (talk) 14:30, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Tupelo Honey/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==GA Review==

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tupelo Honey/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Adabow(complain) 10:12, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

The infobox has recording details, yet these are long-winded and somewhat confusing. Please rewrite these clearly and concisely.
- I've changed the recording dates to the style that's in Achtung Baby, an FA. Kitchen Roll (Exchange words) 11:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Do not mention the B-sides of the singles in the infobox
  - Removed Kitchen Roll (Exchange words) 11:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have made some minor copy-editing changes in the 'Background' and 'Recording' sections to help the flow of prose
'Release' section: there is a lot of missing information here, such as record label, release dates and formats.
- Added record label and release date. Isn't it obvious that it was an LP? Kitchen Roll (Exchange words) 11:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Mention it anyway, as cassette tapes came out around then Adabow(complain) 21:23, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- "Tupelo Honey reached number 27 on the Billboard charts", do you specifically mean the Billboard 200?
  - Changed Kitchen Roll (Exchange words) 11:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
First paragraph of 'Aftermath' section seems a bit PoV, and may need rewording, using quotations, or additional references. Also second sentence should be reworded so that it doesn't start with 'but'.
- Agadant will have to look at that - I don't own the Hage book. Kitchen Roll (Exchange words) 11:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Agadant seems not to be editing at the moment, so I've hiden the paragraph from view, so it can be fixed at a later date - I'll leave a message on Agadant's talk page. Kitchen Roll (Exchange words) 14:50, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have replaced the level three headers in the 'Track listing' section with bold lines
'Personnel' section needs a source
- Added source for "Production". The musicians are referencd in the "Recording section". Kitchen Roll (Exchange words) 11:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In the 'Charts' section there are not several charts, so reorganise this information as prose, rather than tables.
- See The Freewheelin' Bob Dylan, an FA, which uses the same format. Kitchen Roll (Exchange words)
- ""(Straight to Your Heart) Like a Cannonball" was the third single from the album and only reached number 119 on the American charts." Again, specify which chart
  - This would be the Billboard Hot 100, but this makes no sense as it charted at #119, which is more than 100, so I'm not sure about this. Kitchen Roll (Exchange words) 11:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - I thought it might be the Top Heatseekers chart, but that was only introduced in 1993 (apparently) Adabow(complain) 21:23, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      - I reworded it so it says it charted outside the Hot 100 at number 119, which makes more sense. Kitchen Roll (Exchange words) 14:50, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are some minor issues that need to be addressed. I will out the review on hold, and allow seven days for relevant changes to be made. Good luck improving the article! Adabow(complain) 10:12, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I guess everything is satisfied now - just make sure that the now-hidden paragraph is followed up on. Adabow(complain) 06:57, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've restated it using a direct quotation. Agadant (talk) 14:30, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 05:15, 20 July 2010 (UTC). Substituted at 09:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tupelo Honey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:57, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]