Talk:Shenzhen Airlines

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I have removed the "uncanny resemblance to Southwest Airlines", because I can see no resemblance and this is not written in encyclopedic style. If whoever wrote that can justify it in some way then please do so. Mat-C 19:44, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:ShenzhenAirlinesLogo.jpg[edit]

Image:ShenzhenAirlinesLogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ingrish[edit]

The translation of the company motto is a prime example of Ingrish!

Merger proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Discussion is now moot as the original article was speedy deleted for being created by a blocked sockpupper user. [1] SYSS Mouse (talk) 02:45, 18 August 2015 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Propose merging Shenzhen Airlines Flight 9648 into Shenzhen Airlines, possibly under standard header "Accidents and incidents" per WP:NOTNEWS. That looks like a minor issue, similar to other flights with drunk or mentally unstable passengers for which we don't create separate articles. The arson apparently didn't inflict any major damage to the aircraft, no hull loss, nothing more to add. Brandmeistertalk 20:00, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. You might not be aware that authorities suspended operations at Taizhou Airport, the flight's origin due to this major security breach. [2] This quite possibly makes the incident notable. SYSS Mouse (talk) 16:58, 29 July 2015 (UTC)±[reply]
    • Airport operations are suspended on many other occasions, like bad weather (such as recently in Rome Airport due to fire). I don't see lasting impact in this particular case. Brandmeistertalk 18:44, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • Yes, but this time it is with officials sacked and the suspension is not in matter of hours but days. [3] SYSS Mouse (talk) 03:08, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Relatively severe incident. Compared with other incidents where crazy passengers attempt to bring down an aircraft, this had severe damage with destroyed seats and a door making it a major security breach. Although it isn't a serious event like Northwest Airlines Flight 253, its something that needs investigating. A340swazzen (talk) 02:46, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per Brandmeister, not sufficiently notable enough for a stand-alone article. Mjroots (talk) 06:33, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support barely notable incident which is already more than adequately covered in Shenzhen Airlines#Incidents--Petebutt (talk) 03:37, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Notable incident. 217.30.195.63 (talk) 21:42, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shenzhen Airlines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]