Talk:The Durutti Column

Phil Rainford was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 9 February 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into The Durutti Column. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Greater Manchester Low‑importance

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Pop music

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Spelling[edit]

Resolved

– Spelling and rationale for it is sourced in the article now.

Sorry about that edit, MrH - my own listing had the typo.

Is the misspelling of Durruti intentional? --Tothebarricades.tk 20:30, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)

The additional information I added on the source of their name clears up the misspelling. Tomorrowsashes 04:50, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Awesome. So that makes them more, rather than less, knowledgeable. w00t. --Tothebarricades.tk 06:22, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Vini Reilly redirect[edit]

Resolved

– Moot: Vini Reilly is now a separate article.

It seems to me a little off that the page Vini Reilly automatically redirects to here. It suggests a) that it is his only work and b) that he is the only member of worth. It's like making 'Morrissey' redirect to The Smiths.

Yeah, I see what you mean, I'll add that he played with Ed Banger and the Nosebleeds, but until someone's willing to do a full biography of Vini's life, I think the two are worth keeping together for now. And I see what you mean about The Smiths comparison, however Vini is really in complete control of The Durutti Column, writing and composing all the work, whereas Johnny Marr wrote most of the music for The Smiths. -PsychoDave

Why is there no internal link or page devoted specifically to Vini Reilly? I'd like to read one because I know he has some interesting claims concerning alleged misappropriation of materials by Paul Morrissey, whom he played for on a couple of records. I don't know enough about the guy to write such a page myself.--Megaforcemedia 02:15, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't sound like you know much of anything if you think he played on a "couple" of records by "Paul" Morrissey.

Circuses and Bread vs Bread and Circuses[edit]

Resolved

– Mystery solved

As far as I can see, the 1985 album is called Bread and Circuses, not Circuses and Bread. It says Bread and Circuses on the cover art, on the side of the case, on the back of the case, on the CD itself. It is referred to as Bread and Circuses almost everywhere apart from here and in one discography I have been able to find. This discography is on the Durutti Column website BUT states that it was compiled by someone else and doesn't go past 1991. I don't find that particularly confidence inspiring and there are numerous other gaps and flaws in the Durruti Column website. With this in mind I will change the album title as listed in the entry back to Bread and Circuses. If anyone decides to revert it to Circuses and Bread once again, could they please explain here why they are doing so and provide evidence that that is the real name.

You have the 1993 reissue by Disques de Crepuscule - the original 1986 FBN LP and Factory CD (FACD 154) are both called "Circuses and Bread", as were the versions released in other countries in 1986. I'm looking at the Factory CD now, and the words are that way round on the front cover artwork, on the sides of the case, and on the CD itself. I still have the LP somewhere, I think. Rob Stanzel's discography [1] is the result of a lot of discussion on the DC mailing list, and has a Factory Too catalogue number. Here's the original cover art: [2] -- ajn (talk) 21:51, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why no mention of Colin Sharp?[edit]

Resolved

– Sharp's role is now covered in the article.

He was the original vocalist after all. [3] --FACT50 03:24, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's ongoing contention over his inclusion in the "past members" infobox listing with an "allegedly" notation, which I removed with a BBC citation specifying him as a lead singer, despite his omission from the band's official site's listing. Wikipedia prefers secondary sources over primary sources, but since it is a (hopefully small) leap to infer that a lead singer is necessarily a band member, I'm not adamant about including him. The thing is, though, he needs to be either listed or not, without qualifying it as "allegedly" per the MOS. AV3000 (talk) 15:58, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Original Factory catalog numbers[edit]

Resolved

– No consensus to remove serial numbers.

When I overhauled the discography, I took these away. I see someone has replaced most of them. I'm going to leave them there (for now), but it should be noted that these are really totally superfluous in light of the reissues. The only people who would have a serious interest in them are hardcore Factory fanatics. (And there are links on the page which will take any of those people to places where those needs are well served.) But for anybody just now coming to his work, what the original catalog # of the initial issue was is of absolutely zero importance.

I don't agree. The FACs give information about the sequence, they're useful if you're looking for the original albums, and they clearly identify albums with confusing names (see Bread and Circuses above, for example). And the advantage of not having them is.....? Rien Post 07:42, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you take a look at some well-developed discographies (eg. The Beatles discography or perhaps more relevantly New Order discography) they normally include catalogue numbers of the original releases. So I don't see why they shouldn't be included here too.

Additionally, catalogue numbers on Factory are arguably more notable than some; for instance there's a section devoted to them: Factory Records#FAC numbers which even mentions that The Durutti Column's album's numbers ended with 4. --David Edgar 17:03, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As for the notability - yeah, I mentioned that, and the fact that all of that info is available on more than one of the links provided. Aa for the "advantage of not having them" - I basically explained that also. The advantage is that it cuts down on more or less (now) irrelevant clutter. But, again, if there's at least two of you out there who disagree, I guess I'm outvoted at the moment. I'll live.

I have to concur with the "keepers"; the information is encyclopedically useful, and including serial numbers is de rigeur in well-developed discographies here. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(^Õل^ō)ˀ Contribs. 21:16, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Poppy Morgan[edit]

Resolved

– Different Poppy Morgan; don't link to actress article.

Not the actress....i thinkFrancodamned (talk) 23:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're not wrong! Georgethe23rd (talk) 13:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Genre[edit]

I'm not entirely happy with the genre being listed as "post-punk", as very little D.C. material sounds anything like other music classified in this way (Buzzcocks, Joy Division, early Cure, early Echo and the Bunnymen, etc.) I'm not sure D.C. is really classifiable at all, but I don't think post-punk is it. D.C. formed in the midst of a wave of post-punk, and some of its members did post-punk in other projects, and even some D.C. stuff has a post-punk sound, but D.C. has really been a highly unusual sound in the midst of bunch of largely pretty similar post-punk. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(^Õل^ō)ˀ Contribs. 21:16, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Durutti Column. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070702170555/http://www.vinylnet.co.uk/record-label-discographies.asp to http://www.vinylnet.co.uk/record-label-discographies.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:31, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]