Talk:Quezon City Science High School

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Low‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Infobox[edit]

I do not see why there is a necessary use of a template called "Infobox Philippine High School" when "Infobox Secondary School" has been around as an available standard that is more widely used. The Philippine High School infobox template is incomplete, and is really just redundancy which serves no practical purpose. The Secondary School infobox can be used with proper adjustment to labels and information. Rmcsamson 06:59, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree! But until such time, Infobox Philippine High School is here to stay. :) { PMGOMEZ } 06:56, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Quesci logo.jpg[edit]

Image:Quesci logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Information[edit]

Please refrain from adding unnecessary data. This page will greatly improve if you add some references when adding achievements, history and other information. -- Francistar 2:45, 27 August 2012

Background Information Added[edit]

Hi everyone!

In view of the need of researchers to have a school background in their Action Research (per Department of Education Requirement), I have added vital information and demographics regarding our school in this page; however, two editors named Dewritech and ScrapIronIV keep on reverting these additions. Can I ask how to make these contributions a part of the WikiSchools thing? Thanks. 49.144.245.144 (talk) 19:52, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The needs of those researchers or the Department of Education are not Wikipedia's responsibility. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and such trivial detail is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. The school needs to use its own website for that purpose. Scr★pIron^IV 20:17, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to ScrapIronIV[edit]

You are talking about this article being encylopedic when in fact you yourself do not have a clear information as to what "encyclopedic" really means. As indicated by Merriam Webster, "encyclopedic" is defined as:

"of, relating to, or suggestive of an encyclopedia or its methods of treating or covering a subject : comprehensive <an encyclopedic mind> <an encyclopedic collection of armor>" ^[1]

Further, if you use the define:encyclopedic string at Google Search, it would be giving you this definition:

en·cy·clo·pe·dic

inˌsīkləˈpēdik,enˌsīkləˈpēdik/

adjective

adjective: encyclopedic; adjective: encyclopaedic

comprehensive in terms of information.

"he has an almost encyclopedic knowledge of food"

synonyms: comprehensive, complete, thorough, thoroughgoing, full, exhaustive, in-depth, wide-ranging, all-inclusive, all-embracing, all-encompassing, universal, vast; formalcompendious

"his encyclopedic knowledge of food"

relating to or containing names of famous people and places and information about words that is not simply linguistic.

"a dictionary with encyclopedic material"

^[2]

Is there a grievance mechanism for Wikipedia? I am hoping that the higher-ranking administrators of Wikipedia would look into this matter. I would like to believe I'm being suppressed by these two "editors". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.211.195.230 (talk) 02:47, 21 November 2015 (UTC) 112.211.195.230 (talk) 03:13, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:NOT. Also, we are all volunteers here, there are no "ranks" - but we do have administrators. Everyone's work is subject to review by all other editors. Wikipedia works by consensus; but even if you gain consensus that this article does not have to abide by policy, policy wins anyway. Nobody is trying to suppress you; much as you "would like to believe." Scr★pIron^IV 14:52, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Quezon City Science High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:05, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Graduates with Distinction[edit]

Achievements of Graduates? 2A02:1210:5008:8300:8437:1DF6:54A4:22B7 (talk) 13:59, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/encyclopedic

[2] ttps://www.google.com.ph/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=define%3Aencyclopedic

[1]

[2]