Talk:Urnes Stave Church

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2019 and 9 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yu 'Sharon' Shen.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Translation details[edit]

  • Article: no:Urnes stavkyrkje
  • Corresponding English-language article: Urnes stave church
  • Worth doing because: Important historical feature of Norway.
  • Originally Requested by: Darwinek 10:21, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Status: In progress Rje 11:57, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC).
    • Complete Rje 13:44, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)


It seems not possible to make a direct link to correct page on the english pages of Fortidsminneforenings's stave church pages. Agtfjott 17:45, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Romanesque?[edit]

I can't see how a stave church can be classified as Romanesque. It is distinctly Norwegian. --Leifern 21:06, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Woodcarving of a pilgrim[edit]

Hej folks, I'm wondering whom the woodcarving with the subtitle "Pilgrim" depicts. I don't think that this is a pilgrim because I think at the time the church was built pilgrimage where unknown in Norge. Also, a pilgrim with bishop's staff would be an unusual picture. Could it be that this is the apostle Saint Matthias (a traditional pilgrim's symbol from Abbey of St. Matthias in Trier can be found here)? He is usually depicted with an axe and as an apostle he was sort of a bishop so this would explain why he has the staff but not the mitra. Maybe he is also a missionary bishop of the time, like St. Sigurd. Or it could be Saint Botvid, who wasn't a Bishop but is also depicted with an axe (thoug also with a fish). What do you think? --Saint-Louis 11:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The axe is the usual attribute of the Norwegian Saint Olav. Whether this particular image represents Saint Olav is more than I can say (the figure seems to lack obvious royal attributes), but the Norwegian context would at least make that more likely than Saint Botvid, who was mostly a Swedish local saint. Not sure what to do with the bishop's staff, though. The Norwegian (bokmål) article on the church currently claims that the figure is a "bishop or possibly a pilgrim".
Printed sources exist (see the bibliography in the Norwegian version) that presumably discuss the church in detail, and that is probably the best place to look for a better explanation. --Hegvald (talk) 01:05, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant infobox[edit]

Urnes Stave Church
UNESCO World Heritage Site
CriteriaCultural: i, ii, iii
Reference58
Inscription1979 (3rd Session)

I don't understand why the World heritage infobox was removed so I put it back in to create consistency with other World heritage entries. I made a bit of a mess of how the other graphics sit on the page but I am not sure how to fix that. Maybe someone else can fix that for me.Bigbuzzboy (talk) 01:03, 14 October 2009 (UTC) I fixed the images by moving them into a gallery and adding others.Bigbuzzboy (talk) 02:16, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Urnes Stave Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:55, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:51, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]