Talk:Cavite

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

WikiProject Philippine LGUs[edit]

Wondering how to edit the article? The WikiProject Philippine LGUs could be of help. :)

Dasrmariñas City[edit]

It seems that Cavite already has four cities with Dasmariñas City being recently promoted to cityhood from being a municipality, although I cannot find any authoritative source on the Internet. —seav

It's either been promoted, or is being promoted. I couldn't find any authoritative source either. Would asking City Hall next time I'm there be considered Original Research? :) --Sdfisher 03:42, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

If Dasmariñas is a city, then that means that there is a Republic Act that was signed into law. I don't think that mentioning the RA as the authoritative source is considered original research. :) --seav 05:08, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Okay, next time I'm there I'll see if I can find out. After asking some folks living there I suspect it's still in process, though. If the process was complete, I'm sure every resident of Dasmariñas would remember having a party to celebrate it -- although most of them would probably be hazy on the details of the party! It would be that kind of party. :) --Sdfisher 18:51, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

It would appear to not be in progress yet, and is meeting some opposition due to an associated hike in taxes. --Steven Fisher 01:28, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Dasrmariñas is still a first class municipality in Cavite. Its approval for cityhood is still pending in the Senate. --Kabite 24 Aug 2006

That's true! I'm a resident of that place. But now I think it was actually denied because the plebiscite did not reach much popularity. -- Felipe Aira 12:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Felipe Aira (talk • contribs)

Cavite Naval Base[edit]

Cavite Naval Base is called Sangley Point Naval Base... and is still open. How should the article be corrected? --Sdfisher 03:18, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Capital City[edit]

People I edited the capital part but in the process, i ruined the infobox. Thanks 2 all the pplz who edited it. I think trece Martirez IS the capital of Cavite, since politicians and the Cavitenos (myself included) consider it as capital. --Justox Dizaola

I feel that we must revert this thing, changing the capital city of Cavite to Imus, is realy not true. Thanks and regards to our fellow cavitenos there Justox dizaola 11:20, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My map, which seems pretty updated and reliable, says the capital of Cavite Is Trece Martirez. That's good enough for me. I've reverted the article. Coffee 11:28, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is someone who reverted the article back to Imus. I wish to ask anyone who thinks that Imus is the capital show me proof Justox dizaola 03:45, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the official website of the provincial government of cavite says that Imus is the capital and declared as that via PD1163. Is there a more recent law that places Trece Martires (s, not z) as the capital? --seav 19:04, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ask a Caviteno about this tomorrow. --Howard the Duck 14:14, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's Trece Martires City. --Howard the Duck 04:32, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Native Products of Cavite[edit]

I think it would be a helpful subtopic to include. People with sufficient knowledge about this, please contribute. --Eniarrol

== What else but coffee and pineapple. --heero

Fair use rationale for Image:Gen. Mariano Alvarez, Cavite.jpg[edit]

Image:Gen. Mariano Alvarez, Cavite.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ph seal cavite.png[edit]

Image:Ph seal cavite.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.— Save_Us_229 23:04, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish wiki[edit]

I was sure there was one. I wonder if it was deleted.I'll be (re)translating this.--Jondel (talk) 01:26, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--Jondel (talk) 00:02, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Translation into Chinese Wikipedia[edit]

The sections People and Culture, Tourism and Transportation of the 09:46, 13 March 2009 Nick-D version is translated into Chinese Wikipedia.--Wing (talk) 10:39, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Cavite[edit]

this hsection should be separated into a new article. Joshua manimtim2 (talk) 08:04, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cavite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:22, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Cavite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:24, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Vlag Fil Cavite.gif

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:29, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Etivac" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Etivac has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 23 § Etivac until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 14:51, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]