Talk:Automated analyser

In the process of a major rewrite of this page, especially haematological analysers. Povmcdov 14:18, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

advertising?

it seems that encyclopedia article can not contain any advertising of commercial products.

From my point of view, description of measuring principle and classification of equipments - ideal content for this article. Kaverin

Not Precisely, but Good Point

As a professional who uses such analyzers on a daily basis, I can see why the names of several different ones might be mentioned, but not in the way this article does.

• For one thing, different hematology analyzers use similar (but not identical) principles of measuring the cells, and there are other differences in the ways in which these principles are employed. For instance, one analyzer counts RBCs and WBCs in separate apertures, while another uses only one. There are enough differences that I think this article should not say that red cells are counted "this way," and white cells are counted "that way."
• Is this an English version article or an American English one? It keeps switching usage.
• Again, not all "Coagulometers" work the same way. Same for Chemistry analyzers.
• Reticulocytes are often counted by today's analyzers (not so rare as implied here), and most still employ supravital staining such as methylene blue, which is not even mentioned in the blurb about manual retic counts.

Hmm. Think I better consider editing the article. Headzred 13:49, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Chemiluminance analysers.

I want to know about these analysers. Like, how they work? What they consists of? The principle on which they all work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.172.107.218 (talk) 12:58, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Ektachem blood analyzer

Why does it take 9 hours to recalibrate an Ektachem blood analyzer after its lithium-ion has battery has died? 184.77.159.253 (talk) 03:42, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Automated analyser. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928015634/http://www.beckman.com/literature/ClinDiag/AU%209389%20Tanner%20Case%20Study.pdf to http://www.beckman.com/literature/ClinDiag/AU%209389%20Tanner%20Case%20Study.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928015537/http://www.beckman.com/coultercounter/homepage_tech_coulter_principle.jsp to http://www.beckman.com/coultercounter/homepage_tech_coulter_principle.jsp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:01, 22 October 2016 (UTC)