Talk:H.O.T.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Wikipedia is getting on my nerves, I was trying to provide more FACTS about H.O.T and they just kept deleting it. I added H.O.T's fan color and that they wrote their own songs, but someone here kept saying I am advertsing or placing ads or my info being uncontrucive!?!?!? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.81.122.162 (talk) 17:34, 28 September 2010 (UTC) --ISSUE RESOLVED! 64.81.122.162 (talk) 18:03, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


This page is super messy and someone keeps messing it up on purpose STOP! Everytime i try to change it to its right info and someone keeps reverting it back to ridiculous info..IF YOU DONT KNOW ABOUT H.O.T. STOP REVERTING IT BACK! ElementalMissHap (talk) 19:39, 12 June 2008 (UTC)ElementalMissHap[reply]

This page is really messy...but unfortunately, I know very little about H.O.T. SKS2K6 08:43, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yea.. This article's getting really annoying. It's very obvious that fans contributed to this article without knowing what the hell wikipedia is... mirageinred 21:54, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I took out the part said they broke up because of financial issue, because no one really know the real reason.


H.O.T.'s disbandment[edit]

Someone please edit or rewrite the part about H.O.T.'s breakup. I fixed it up a little so that the previously stated false information wouldn't stay up, but it still needs to be polished eventually.

The real reasons regarding their breakup were never officially released to the public, therefore financial reasons still remain as unverified rumors TO THIS DAY.

Fair use rationale for Image:SMTown - 2001 Winter Vacation in SMtown-com - Angel Eyes.JPG[edit]

Image:SMTown - 2001 Winter Vacation in SMtown-com - Angel Eyes.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SMTown - 2000 Winter Vacation In SMTOWN-com.jpg[edit]

Image:SMTown - 2000 Winter Vacation In SMTOWN-com.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SMTown - 1999 Christmas In SMTOWN.jpg[edit]

Image:SMTown - 1999 Christmas In SMTOWN.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moon Hee Jun's solo career.[edit]

Um, I have his first album & I wouldn;t call it R&B. It's more like a strange blend of techno, metal, & ballad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.160.123.254 (talk) 13:53, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Jae Won[edit]

Lee Jae Won has returned from military service.

http://www.dkpopnews.net/2011/03/news-five-member-group-hot-re-united.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.31.174.5 (talk) 11:09, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on H.O.T. (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:57, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moved 2014[edit]

19 September 2014‎ Kanghuitari (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (8,399 bytes) 0‎ . . (Kanghuitari moved page Talk:H.O.T. (Korean band) to Talk:H.O.T. (band)) (undo | thank)

But Hot (band) goes to dab. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:01, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on H.O.T. (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on H.O.T. (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:52, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

H.O.T. has yet to officially get back together[edit]

H.O.T. reunited for 1 Infinite Challenge episode. They have yet to officially get back together or sign contracts. They have also strongly deny rumors of an upcoming concert, so please until they officially get back together don’t assume that they have started promotions again. I know we all want it, but it’s basically pressuring them. Vvl12 (talk) 02:00, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:BTS (band) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:18, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:22, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2AM (band) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1:43 (band) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:20, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1:43 (band) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:24, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 July 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Consensus is the current title is unnecessarily disambiguated as the undisambiguated title already redirects to this article, and that the dots in the title adequately distinguish from plain HOT. (non-admin closure) В²C ☎ 12:44, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

H.O.T. (band) → H.O.T. – WP:QUALIFIER; It is unnecessary for there to be a parenthetical in the title when the name "H.O.T.", with its full stops after each letter, is as unique as it can get on its own. And there is no other article on this website with this exact name styling. beetricks ~ 💬 · ✉️ 15:42, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose oppose oppose HOT is a common acronym. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:11, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support: H.O.T. is already a redirect to this article and has been since 2014, so the disambiguation seems unnecessary here. In fact, it was actually created as a redirect by you, @In ictu oculi:. The disambiguation page for HOT mentions one other entry using the acronym H.O.T., however the article is actually titled Hawaii Opera Theatre and uses the acronym HOT without the full stops. Alex (talk) 19:48, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support and hatnote per WP:SMALLDETAILS. 85.67.32.244 (talk) 20:39, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, this is the only entry titled H.O.T., all the others are titled Hot or HOT. JIP | Talk 01:13, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's a minor stylism. The acronym HOT (hypovolaemia, oxygenation, tension pneumothorax) is used to describe simultaneous interventions to rapidly treat reversible causes of cardiac arrest. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:27, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support While there are other "HOT" acronyms, it's clear that when using this specific punctuation format this is the intended target for readers, and we do not benefit from intentionally directing them elsewhere.--Yaksar (let's chat) 02:43, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support H.O.T. is a separate entry. It is not the same as HOT. SkylightXO (talk) 14:43, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:H.O.T.&oldid=1194332390"