Talk:I My Me! Strawberry Eggs

early comments

"Misandristic" is not in the dictionary... Omnipotent Q

From [1]:

A better modern Greek term for a man-hater is misandrist, though it’s hardly common and appears in only a few dictionaries, with the noun for the concept being, as you’d expect, misandry.

Maybe better to change it to man-hating? Angela 02:07, Sep 11, 2003 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. I'm sure many could have guessed the meaning of the word, but it's still an odd one. And I don't mean to be an ass, just commenting. Omnipotent Q 23:14, 14 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Serious contender for "Worst Wikipedia Article Ever"

After having come here to find additional and basic information after watching the series for myself, I come to this page to find the anti-hesis of what Wikipedia is about. Information and non-biased encyclopedic format that Wikipedia is for is the opposite of what is found here. Rather the article has an almost entire lack of Encyclopedic or informational value, and an extreme overabundance of speculation, bais, aggressively opinionated statements, and reads much more like a critical review than an information page. Out of the many, many Wikipedia pages i've ever come across, this, by far would get my vote as the worst and most pooly organized, and useless Wikipedia pages i've seen, to date. I would seriously nominate this entire article to be deleted and re-written from scratch as an informational page about the anime itself, rather than starting, continuing and ending as a personal review. Wikipedia is for information and Encyclopedic entries. Not for subjective personal reviews. This should be completely erased and re-written in the proper format, as virtually nothing that I've seen in the main and opening paragraph resembles an Encyclopedic format. If you want to discuss the personal feelings and debate the analytical ramifications of I My Me! Strayberry Eggs, take it to an anime discussion board. And away from here.

Made a number of additions/deltions

I made a number of edits to the text under the identity 153.39.170.184. Please feel free to add or modify what I've written. My rationale for modifying the article is that the series does not explore the issue of pedophilia; rather it seems more correct to me to state that the film explores the issue of sex between an adult/teacher and a teenage minor. I also felt that it was necessary to more clearly separate the issue of cross-dressing/homosexuality and sex with a minor.

Are you the one who wrote most of that leading section (from the revision history, it didn't seem to have been there before your work on the article)? If so... dude, did we watch the same show? I've seen a lot of anime, and I My Me! is a very bland show which does NOT try to present sexual diversity in an attempt to draw awareness and to educate -- the cross-dressing and the ephebophilia are devices for the show's fairly weak plot. That whole leading section reads like someone's Asian Studies thesis, casually lifted and applied to this anime and one which would apply just as well, if not better, to any of a dozen anime built around the same plot devices as this one (90% of which are at least more interesting and thought-provoking -- though most likely not in the progressive way the leading section suggests -- than I My Me). That leading section is going to mislead many an inquisitive anime fan into watching this show, and they're NOT going to see what those paragraphs suggest is in the anime. I My Me! is a low-budget romance who uses the cross-dressing and the ephebophilia to distinguish itself from the dozens of other sappy school romances out there -- nothing more, nothing less. 75.110.14.59 07:19, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Fifth episode

Where is the review in which the reviewer complains about the content of the fifth (the "breast size") episode? That's the most vapid appraisal of the episode that could ever be written! Aggh, that's not really a comment on the article, I just hope somebody can find that review so that we can source it. Also, I sort of think we should give the episode a fair shake, as Ms. Amawa does deliver a stirring speech at the end about why we should not appeal to the basest instincts of men, and the episode is largely about the very real insecurities of young women, specifically Fuko, rather than the titillation to be had from watching pubescent girls compare their bust sizes. I just can't think of a way to write it that doesn't sound tit-for-tat. (It's more that the show is frank and less than that it's vulgar.)

Oh, I changed "I My Me! Strawberry Eggs!" to "I My Me! Strawberry Eggs" because that's what's on the box and in the show itself. I hope nobody minds. The two exclamation points are way too hyper anyway. Cherry Cotton 06:37, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Characters

I deleted a line under Hibiki Amawa, due to spoilers, and too much information to a character description. It's meant to be a brief over view of the charcter, not explain the entire plot to it.

Sorry about that! I'd seen details of plot endings on other pages relating to anime and couldn't see a problem. Should references to how Hibiki comes to be known as "bra man" be left in or should they too be excised? Do we need a spoiler warning? Theelf29 10:32, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Character Listings -- Really Necessary?

Is a listing of 14 characters really necessary I'd put five characters as "main" characters if I were to be liberal about it; if counting all main and secondary characters, I come up with less than ten. Maybe I need to re-watch the series again, but I don't see the need to include about so many characters. Perhaps one reason for this is because they simply state, "He/She is a student at the Seitow Sannomiya Private School. He/She is Person's friend and A Single Detail About Him/Her."

Of course, I myself was one of the main ones behind the List of characters in Saint Tail, so I hope I don't sound somewhat of a hypocrite here. For the listing of the Strawberry Eggs characters on the main page, I think:

1. It is clutter which should be removed, causing a visual mess with large images compared to almost no text.
2. If it's too be kept, then the information should be padded (with important info, not with fluff for sake of padding), at which time it becomes too long for the main Strawberry Eggs page, and it should be moved to a "List of characters in" page.

Thoughts?

~~Lesoria 04:07, 16 April 2007 (UTC) _{Subscript text}

about ,,yaoi" ref. in the 1st paragraph

,,Though the base of the story makes it looks like yaoi or even yuri, this is a comedy without homosexual content, except a misunderstanding in one of the episodes." I mean, if a man cross-dresses to be a woman, that could lead to yaoi. no, i didn't mistake the two word, but now i corrected, because both misunderstanding possible. --Drhlajos 14:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Immst-Iwaya50.jpg

Image:Immst-Iwaya50.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:59, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Imyme hibiki0090.jpg

Image:Imyme hibiki0090.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Imyme hibiki0169.jpg

Image:Imyme hibiki0169.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:45, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Baa-chan edit

I removed the major spoiler from the ending of Baa-chan's discription. I changed it to something more vague that those who have seen the series will get. Noremon (talk) 00:35, 11 April 2008 (UTC)Noremon

Cleanup rationale

I cleaned up the article the best I could, removing some things which I'll explain here. First, only the Japanese and English voice actors should be listed in the character section, as the Spanish voice actors can be covered on the Spanish wiki, and are irrelevant for this article. Next, most of the staff info (which seemed to be a copy/paste from ANN or somewhere similar) was removed as most of it is irrelevant, and staff lists have been phased out in favor of an overview of the most important members of the production staff including the director, writer, music director, and the like. All this info was merged into a single Production section along with the music info. The "Goofs" section was removed per WP:TRIVIA, and the Themes section was removed because it was unsourced original research. The ages/blood types were removed because they are largely trivia unimportant to understanding the character information. The character's names were all written in hiragana for some odd reason, and I added in the kanji of the names I could find, and the rest were removed until the kanji can be added in.--十八 09:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Controversy

Where? In themes and controversy, it lists themes which may be controversial but not any controversy surrounding them. Teacher/student relationships and crossdressing are not new on American and especially not JAPANESE tv so perhaps more indepth info is required here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.207.50.47 (talk) 23:26, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on I My Me! Strawberry Eggs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080605233516/http://www.geneon-ent.co.jp/rondorobe/anime/imm-egg/ to http://www.geneon-ent.co.jp/rondorobe/anime/imm-egg/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:21, 10 November 2017 (UTC)