Talk:Zombie Nation (musician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Two producers?[edit]

My CD inlay mentions a guy called "Mooner", next to "Splank!". Who is this and why isn't he mentioned here in the article, not even as a former member of the team? 85.5.58.89 (talk) 13:25, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kernkraft 400 History[edit]

The currently referenced link for Wake's first use of Kernkraft 400 is simply a recap of the game mentioned. Here's a link that actually includes a firsthand account of the song being played at that game: http://www.playerhatersball.com/2007/07/skip-prossers-first-year-at-wake-forest.html However, I'm guessing Wikipedia's policy on blogs would prevent the link being used as a reference. Still, it would be good to have a better source than the current one. Theharmonyguy (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I think Penn State's use of Kernkraft 400 deserves a mention, as it's quite popular with them. As for history, this article seems to indicate that Penn State's first use of the song was in 2005: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05317/605725.stm I mention it because the current article and aforementioned links don't firmly establish Wake as the first major team to use the song at a sporting event, though I've heard that story elsewhere. Theharmonyguy (talk) 13:15, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind - this story indicates Penn State was using it 2004: http://www.collegian.psu.edu/archive/2004/11/11-05-04tdc/11-05-04dops-edit-01.asp Still haven't found a source to confirm the Wake Forest story, though it's still plausible. Theharmonyguy (talk) 13:24, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Popularity[edit]

"The first Zombie Nation Record contained the song "Kernkraft 400", which is considered one of the most famous songs of electronic dance music." - The only thing Zombie Nation can be considered famous for is for stealing the original song from David Whittaker. And anyone who thinks this song is one of the most famous songs in the whole electronic dance music scene needs to get his head examined :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.112.73.40 (talk) 19:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. There are NO sources for that. --The O o (talk) 20:01, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Name confusion[edit]

Isn't Kernkraft 400 the techno song by Zombie Nation, instead of vice versa?

I thought so :S, But I guess we are both wrong, check the link --x1987x 21:39, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The group is not titled 'Zombie Nation'. This is the name of one their hit songs. The title of this page needs to be edited. Kernkraft 400 is the correct name of this group.

No, you are wrong. Zombie Nation is the band, Kernkraft 400 is the song. See the offical Zombie Nation website, for example.

Yes, Zombie Nation is a band, Kernkraft 400 is the song. The article is correct. LeinadSpoon 04:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zombie Nation is a producer, you knuckleheads. And he produced the track 'Kernkraft 400', and he's not a band. Urbanriot (talk) 20:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a track (and album) called Zombienation, but it's nothing to do with this Zombie Nation, which is the artist name. The 2002 track Zombienation is by Tumor (aka Chris Pohl of Blutengel). --Thegooseking (talk) 10:31, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. How about you guys look it up on iTunes and see what comes up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.227.115.22 (talk) 23:15, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


There is also a track CALLED Zombie Nation, which is a REMIX of Kernkraft 400, by an industrial band called Grendel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.58.229.118 (talk) 22:21, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Plaigarism[edit]

No one covers the fact that Zombie nation was taken to court over having plagiarized Kernkraft 400 24.23.236.186 (talk) 12:15, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zombie Nation (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]