Talk:Audrey Eu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Should that be

"She[Audrey] was the chairperson of the HKBA" and not

"She[Audrey] was the chairman of the HKBA"?

-- Soul 1337 10:42 Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)

Chairperson is more likely. Deryck C. 8 July 2005 05:43 (UTC)

As far as I know, HKBA insists on calling its chief "chairman" instead of the more PC "chairperson". In fact, Eu herself prefers "chairman" to "chairperson". Check this link: http://www.audreyeu.org/public/contents/article?revision%5fid=3275&item%5fid=2107

Dispute on factual accuracy: Deryck and Instantnood are discussing whether it's the in Beijing media or the pro-Beijing media that views Audrey Eu as the evil woman. Deryck C. 8 July 2005 05:43 (UTC)

This dispute is solved by Instantnood with a proof that the occurence of "Beijing Media" was a translation error. Deryck C.
See user talk:Deryck Chan/Archive 2#Audrey Eu article. — Instantnood 07:37, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

POV tag[edit]

This concerns POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 00:08, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Audrey Eu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:50, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Audrey Eu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:38, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalizing "legislative council"[edit]

@Deryck Chan: No, "legislative council" is not a proper noun. Please read and understand MOS:INSTITUTIONS before making such changes. Your argument could be made (but would still be invalid) about any organization, such as "the university" in the context of Harvard University, or "the company" in the context of Home Depot. That's simply not what the MoS calls for. Please restore to lower case. Chris the speller yack 14:08, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Chris the speller: From the first line of the guideline you referred to: "Also treat as a proper name a shorter but still specific form, consistently capitalized in reliable generalist sources". See e.g. DDG search for The Standard newspaper, which consistently capitalises Legislative Council on its own when referring specifically to HK LegCo. Deryck C. 14:13, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Deryck Chan: When the MoS says "a shorter but still specific form" (emphasis mine), I think it means actually specific. There are lots of legislative councils. A specific form would be "Hong Kong Legislative Council", and I don't think you can shorten that without turning it back into a common noun, which is how dictionaries show "legislative council". The fact that one newspaper likes to capitalize it doesn't mean that WP should. Beware the specialized-style fallacy. Chris the speller yack 20:24, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Chris the speller: I think "Legislative Council" is suitably specific in the context of a Hongkongese politician - it can't refer to anything else. But anyway I don't think we can come to agreement on this. Looking at the original sentence in question, I realised readers would probably be better served by rewriting it altogether and adding "Hong Kong" to the sentence, so I did that (which sidesteps the issue of lower vs upper case). Deryck C. 14:18, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Deryck Chan: Yes, rewriting it is the better course of action. Happy editing! Chris the speller yack 15:49, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Audrey_Eu&oldid=1201823310"