Talk:Loss of supply

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rewroted section on Australia. The Senate didn't actually vote against supply, they refused to vote on the subject.

Thanks for clarifying that. JTD 02:48 Jan 4, 2003 (UTC)


Supply has a capital letter because it is a formal constitutional term in a definition. Supply with a small 's' means something different. A 'Motion of Confidence', for example, would also have capitals, as a formal term. JTD 22:52 Jan 4, 2003 (UTC)


  • "In the wake of World War II, in Japan" I wrote but I am not sure about the details. Sorry for confusing. Taku 01:18 Jan 5, 2003 (UTC)
No problem, Tak. I look forward to reading the full info when you have it. JTD 02:02 Jan 5, 2003 (UTC)

Is this vandalism or just poorly worded?[edit]

I just removed the following from the article:

Obviously the Senate didn't actually block supply, so if its not vandalism what's it trying to say? Colonial Overlord (talk) 15:22, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Lenore Taylor (29 May 2014). "Tony Abbott begins meeting crossbench senators but not Clive Palmer". theguardian.com. Guardian News and Media. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
  2. ^ Lisa Cox (4 June 2014). "Independent MP Andrew Wilkie calls on fellow members to block supply over 'miserable' budget". Brisbane Times. Fairfax Media. Retrieved 4 June 2014.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Loss of supply. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:38, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]