Talk:Chilean Constitution of 1980

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chile High‑importance

	Chile portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

The full text of the constitution is a dead link, from what I can see. --Zahra 02:28, Dec 13, 2004 (UTC)

2005 Constitution[edit]

Could we say there's a Constitution o 2005? (Appart from government "advertising") Of what i've been reading, there is some kind of dispute among academics, whether this Constitution should be called of 1980, 1989 or 2005. It seems to me the issue is not 100% solved.

Baloo rch 14:18, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly... Although, strictly speaking is 1980 Constitution, only amended in 2005... Not a new constitution --Yakoo 21:37, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such thing as a "2005 Constitution." The Chilean Constitution is the 1980 one, with amendments. --maxatl (talk) 04:14, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The academic dispute exists. But it is not a great controversy. It doesn't make any difference in the everyday application of the constitution.--Wgarciamachmar (talk) 16:35, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Army/Air Force Links[edit]

The various Army and Air Force links on this page don't go to a page about Chile's Army or Air Force, but to the general-purpose Army page and Air Force disambiguation page. I'm not really sure what to link them to, since there probably isn't enough information about Chile's military to warrant a page about them. Should we just remove the links? Direct them to the general-info pages? --Mechcozmo 00:33, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

English Translation[edit]

The link to the english translation (pdf) takes to the original 1980 text. That should be stated, or the link should be erased. --maxatl (talk) 04:14, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Constitution of Chile. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.bcn.cl/pags/legislacion/leyes/resena_const.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061207024251/https://www.presidencia.cl/view/pop-up-nueva-constitucion-texto.asp to https://www.presidencia.cl/view/pop-up-nueva-constitucion-texto.asp
Added archive {newarchive} to https://www.presidencia.cl/documentos/Constituci%F3n%20Pol%EDtica.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:14, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs big improvement[edit]

I came to the article to see what the constitution says. No information at all. Just that there was a referendum to rewrite it. This is just crappy.

I will try to fix it but it needs help.

Covid 22 (talk) 23:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To add to article[edit]

To add to this article: mention of American economist James M. Buchanan's role in helping to craft this constitution, while working as advisor to the Augusto Pinochet regime in 1980. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 16:23, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any supporting refs that could be used to add that? - Indefensible (talk) 06:20, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]