Talk:Jus ad bellum

International relations: Law Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject International law (assessed as Mid-importance).

Military history: Technology

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Latin High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

What are these?[edit]

Could somebody say what these are? I can't understand at all. moink 19:04, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Origination date[edit]

Can someone with a better grasp of the history address Robert Kolb's claim that the doctrine dates only from the 1920s? Most sources claim it was invented by Augustine of Hippo in the early fifth century - including our own page on Augustine! Securiger 09:08, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)

This is because the term jus ad bellum was invented and codified at that point. Augustine put forth the initial ideas about conduct in waging and starting wars. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.66.77 (talk) 03:31, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Time for merge![edit]

lets merge this bitch----69.105.108.161 (talk) 00:45, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

kemp dog wouldnt want to merge this —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.240.216.106 (talk) 00:55, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UN Charter Article 51[edit]

The UN Charter Article 51 should be mentioned in the section "Principles of jus ad bellum", in particular the last sentence of that article. 83.233.204.43 (talk) 02:58, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Iraq war[edit]

Can we add this somehow?

Blair was told it would not be a legal war.

Wythy (talk) 15:23, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jus ad bellum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:48, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Latin translation[edit]

I'm pretty sure my Latin ("right to war") is correct but it's a very literal translation and my Latin is rusty. Could someone double check it? Delukiel (talk) 00:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]