Talk:Eben Byers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

His funeral[edit]

Just out of morbid curiosity, how was his funeral handled? Smerdis of Tlön 14:04, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)

I'd say closed casket.66.41.66.213 (talk) 01:29, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Radium Poisoning[edit]

According to this article, Byers has been marketing and personally consuming a lot of "Radithor" water containing approximately 2 microcurie of Radium per portion, three times a day. Byers disease and death raised public concerns about safety of radioactive waters consumption. However the theory of radium poisoning seems to be disproved. Apparently Byers died from blood diseases while no other patient that was consuming Radithor has ever suffered from anything similar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.149.224.78 (talk) 12:49, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Those claims were made by the very physician responsible; an explanation rather obviously concocted to protect his professional reputation. The article itself states "Radithor is one of the few radioactive quack cures that can be unambiguously linked to someone's death" and does not directly dispute any of the information in the main article. Danny Darko (talk) 16:16, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trivial mention[edit]

No place for this in the article, but I thought I'd mention that P. N. Elrod's novel Bloodlist mentions Byers' death obliquely in the sentence: Only four years ago there was a case of a Pittsburgh man who died horribly from ingesting a quack medicine containing radioactive salts. --Auric (talk) 14:22, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eben Byers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:03, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WSJ headline[edit]

The Wall Street Journal ran a headline reading "The Radium Water Worked Fine until His Jaw Came Off" after his death.

This is a lovely headline, but unfortunately the way it’s presented in the text is highly misleading (though not strictly wrong). The article in question is not, as the sentence makes it sound, contemporary, as is clear from the subtitle:

Cancer Researcher Unearths A Bizarre Tale of Medicine And Roaring '20s Society

and the text:

Nearly 20 years after Mr. Bailey’s death in 1949 of bladder cancer, medical researchers exhumed his remains.

as well as from the first reference given for the sentence, a 2003 blog post:

Years ago the Wall Street Journal recounted the grisly case under a particularly memorable headline: THE RADIUM WATER WORKED FINE UNTIL HIS JAW CAME OFF.

The article refers to “a report in today's Journal of the American Medical Association” by Roger M. Macklis (third and fourth paragraph), which is probably either “Radithor and the Era of Mild Radium Therapy” (doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03450050072031) or “The Radiotoxicology of Radithor: Analysis of an Early Case of latrogenic Poisoning by a Radioactive Patent Medicine” (doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03450050077032), both published 1 August 1990 and authored by Roger M. Macklis (et al. in the case of the second article). An article from 1990 would indeed be able to report on a ca. 1969 exhumation, and may well be referred to as “years ago” in a 2003 blog post.

I don’t want to remove the mention of the headline altogether, but I can’t think of a good way to phrase it that avoids this false impression. Does anyone else have a good idea? (Radithor#History would also have to be updated.) —Galaktos (talk) 15:39, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This has since been resolved, mainly at Special:Diff/986113168 and Special:Diff/810073340. Galaktos (talk) 23:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gruesome photo?[edit]

There's an image of a gruesome nature: File:Eben Byers Without a Jaw.png.

Is it appropriate to include in the article? Chumpih t 20:37, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1: Are we certain this is a real photograph of the subject of the article? and 2: Is it freely available for use? If both are true, then 3: Is the image appropriate or needed for use in the article? Ifrit (Talk) 17:45, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ifrit It should be included in the article. It is indeed quite gruesome but if nothing else it does justice to his story. Mystman1 (talk) 17:35, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is the consensus amongst experts out there that the gruesome photo is not of Byers? Kingturtle = (talk) 22:56, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]