Talk:List of cities in Missouri

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Missouri High‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Saint vs. St.[edit]

The cities stored under 'Saint' now point to 'Saint'. Those stored under 'St.' still point to 'St.'.

I was going to start moving the 'St.' cities in Missouri to 'Saint', but decided to do some research. My understanding of Wikipedia policy is there is a general guideline to avoid use of abbreviations. I've looked for an official policy on 'Saint' vs. 'St.' and haven't found one yet, although I did find some angry words about changing 'St.' to 'Saint' on a user:talk page - I don't consider that official.

If anybody sees this, can you guide me to a policy page? I'll follow an official policy. If there isn't one, my thought would be "don't use abbreviations." Using that criteria, we should move all 'St.' articles to 'Saint'.

If we go the other way, we should move all the 'Saint' articles to 'St.'. The idea of cities -> 'St.' and people -> 'Saint' is viable, too, but it leaves a funny taste in my brain.

Love to hear other thoughts.

Brian Rock 04:55, Apr 3, 2004 (UTC)

The usual rule (highest level rule?) is "use the name most people will naturally link to". At least that's why they never let me move United States to United States of America. I think most people would link to St. Louis, Missouri, not Saint Louis, Missouri but I don't know if this was ever part of a naming convention - maybe the de facto "leave it where ever Rambot put it" convention. Rmhermen 05:06, Apr 3, 2004 (UTC)

Did you read this talk page: [1]? Rmhermen 05:16, Apr 3, 2004 (UTC)

Just read it, see below.

Some discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(city_names). I'm wading through it.

The 'most people' argument would probably use the abbreviation. I don't think Rambot is consistent, or maybe folks have been moving things around. I do know that it's 'Saint Louis, Missouri', which I think is the biggest 'Saint' city in the US. Not that that means anything.

I want closure, but of course, we don't always get what we want. For the moment, I won't go moving 'Saint's to 'St.'s or vice versa.

Thanks. Brian Rock 05:21, Apr 3, 2004 (UTC)

One more quick note. I read it some more and I don't see that the Naming conventions page really settled the issue. I don't want to start a project that will draw a lot of heat, so I figure I'll just leave things as they are. Maybe some day, we'll get a standard. Brian Rock 05:30, Apr 3, 2004 (UTC)

According to my Webster's dictionary, "St." should always be used in reference to a title (regardless of the fact it's an abbreviation) and the "Saint" cities are named for someone who is a saint. That is, "Saint Louis" is improrper, it should be "St. Louis" because the city was named for St. Louis IX (or X?).Rt66lt 07:27, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of towns and villages in Missouri[edit]

Much of the information in the towns and villages articles belongs here; Missouri does not recognize "town" as an entity in the state.Rt66lt 07:24, 25 March 2006 (UTC) I have went through and staightened out the towns and villages and cities articles via the state's official manual.Rt66lt 03:46, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

more than just a list[edit]

There seems to be a major difference between "list of cities" and "cities of" articles. I clearly see the distinction, but am adding to this page as if it were the latter variety. If users on this talk page think it necessary the article could be split into two pages, but i'm not certain that is necessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DaronDierkes (talk • contribs) 08:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Population data based on 2012 estimates.[edit]

The ranked list has this sentence above it: Population data based on 2012 estimates.
However, that is not true, since there are also populations from 2010 Census. Maybe something else was tried to say? 82.141.73.182 (talk) 16:23, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of cities in Missouri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:19, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]