Talk:Nanotechnology

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nanotechnology article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2: 90 days

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Physics High‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Robotics High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemistry High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupational Safety and Health

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Mukunda P Das (18 Feb 2022). "Mesoscopic systems in the quantum realm". IOPscience.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Mike Nizza (30 May 2007). "Lawmaking via Wikipedia". The New York Times Online.

This article is prone to spam. Please monitor the References and External links sections.

Semi-protected edit request on 28 February 2018[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add below "Origin" subheading following lines: First usage of nanotechnology goes back to 4th century when a Roman artisan made a chalice called the Lycurgus Cup. Particles were so small that were just 50 nanometers in diameter. That means these elements were less than one-thousandth the size of a grain of table salt.^[1] Ianzonja (talk) 21:35, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Holloway A., Romans Mastered Nanotechnology and Used it for Eye Catching Decoration, Ancient-Origins

Not done: I dispute that the definition or example of "nanotechnology" should not include artistic use of nanoscale particles as the Roman did. The article emphasizes that nanoscale method is done with intentional technological advantage. The source interprets that the Roman artisan played with dust for artistic effect, and had a fortunate outcome which I agree is beautiful (like adding varnish to flat paint to create gloss), but not technologically intended. --Zefr (talk) 23:33, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As a colleague of mine once stated (he was at the time actually involved in high level committees in the EU on the definition of nanotechnology), if we start defining nanotechnology like this, then boiling an egg (i.e. changing the molecular structure of the protein at a nano-scale) should also be labelled nanotechnology.

Or in other words, I fully support Zefr's call here for much the reason given. Arnoutf (talk) 15:32, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nanotechnology definition[edit]

Definition According to CRN(Center for responsible nanotechnology) = It is a engineering of tailoring of functional system at the molecular or atomic scale. Vyas jay (talk) 14:50, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 January 2019[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I think this could be included in history part, because this is nano

The photocatalytic properties of nanosized titanium dioxide were published by Akira Fujishima in 1972. Fujishima, Akira; Honda, Kenichi (1972). "Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode". Nature. 238 (5358): 37–8. Hyacintara (talk) 16:45, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. SITH (talk) 21:10, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Portal:Nanotechnology for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Nanotechnology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Nanotechnology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:27, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 January 2020[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In both tables "Top nanotechnology research organizations" the MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MESA%2B_Institute_for_Nanotechnology) is missing. I would like add this institute to the tables, respectively with this data:

MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology - The Netherlands - 193 first patents - 6736 Scientific publications

References: Web of Science (https://apps.webofknowledge.com), Annual reports (https://www.utwente.nl/en/organization/facts-and-figures/annual-report/) Florismetzner (talk) 08:49, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: This is not a compiled list but a list of top ten organizations at the time of publication from the World Intellectual Property Organization. MESA+ did not qualify under either of the criteria WIPO used in compiling that report. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:40, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nano-architected silica reported to be 5x lighter & 4x stronger than steel[edit]

I thought this might be of interest for this article.

"Scientists Create New Material Five Times Lighter and Four Times Stronger Than Steel". SciTechDaily. 2023-08-01. Retrieved 2023-08-01.
Michelson, Aaron; Flanagan, Tyler J.; Lee, Seok-Woo; Gang, Oleg (2023). "High-strength, lightweight nano-architected silica". Cell Reports Physical Science. 4 (7). Elsevier BV: 101475. doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101475. ISSN 2666-3864.

Peaceray (talk) 15:27, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: IFS213-Hacking and Open Source Culture[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 September 2023 and 19 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Monsterinthevi 1 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Chikenscratch.

— Assignment last updated by UndercoverSwitch (talk) 03:31, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Two references and one paragraph added[edit]

I added a paragraph under the Applications subheading that discusses Nanoencapsulation. An important topic of Nanotechnology that has revolutionized the medical field. I also added two references that back up the claims made. Monsterinthevi 1 (talk) 00:59, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The paragraphs you added have too much Peacock, that is they use words which exaggerate and are bragging. Please rewrite with a more neutral tone, otherwise they should be removed. Ldm1954 (talk) 01:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Updated, please let me know if any further revisions are needed. Monsterinthevi 1 (talk) 20:02, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there is more you have to do:

Reference 64 is to a repository, you need to use the original journal. You also need to read the article to see if there really are any products or this is speculation
Reference 65 is also a repository, also cannot be used.

You need to look carefully whether you are being misled by claims that are spin versus solid in reputable sources. Nanotechnology is full of spin and inappropriate claims, and some good science (perhaps 20% is decent). Ldm1954 (talk) 20:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Holloway A., Romans Mastered Nanotechnology and Used it for Eye Catching Decoration, Ancient-Origins

[1]