Talk:Sagittarius A*

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sagittarius A* article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

A news item involving Sagittarius A* was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 13 May 2022.

Wikipedia

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Why are there 3 bright spots on the Sgr A* photo?[edit]

At 8:28 in "How to Understand What Black Holes Look Like" by Veritassium. (Wikipedia won't let me link the video)

Derek from veritassium talks about how one side of the image will look brighter than the other because of the spin of the acretion disk. And shows a more accurate simulation of the interstellar black hole.

But to me, I would just expect 1 kinda lump where it's brighter on that one side. But in the Sagittarius A* photo there are 3 bright spots.

Even the M87 photo kinda looks like 2 bright spots instead of just 1 like I would expect. 2600:100C:B257:C80E:4928:A5B1:2F28:FE4E (talk) 16:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid talk pages are made for editors to discuss how they can improve the article they are dedidcated to, not as a place to talk about the topic itself. Please keep this in mind next time you use a talk page. Infrish 2 (talk) 11:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's our Galaxy it's the Milky Way 🌌[edit]

2404:3C00:903F:ED60:8140:3205:FF70:3CC6 (talk) 00:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]