This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Parliament constituencies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Parliament constituencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK Parliament constituenciesWikipedia:WikiProject UK Parliament constituenciesTemplate:WikiProject UK Parliament constituenciesUK Parliament constituencies articles
Is it me or does this section read less as a description of the seat and more as a draft of a Lib Dem leaflet for targetting the seat and proving "only we can win here" [sic]? Timrollpickering 10:58, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
To my knowledge, Rene Kinzett has always been the Conservative candidate, not the Lib Dem... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.169.159 (talk) 17:46, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
He was Lib Dem, defected after that election to the Conservatives. The article is correct. - JCJ (talk) 20:31, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum: this can be used as a source if you wish to have further evidence. - JCJ (talk) 20:33, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
