Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/KF

KF

final (18/0/0) ending 1:30, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)

KF has been here for two years and has made approximately 7,000 edits, to literary and geographic topics and many others. KF is also a prolific copy editor and is active reverting vandalism. I offer this nomination with KF's permission.

The Uninvited Co., Inc. 01:09, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Candidate assumed to accept nomination by virtue of answering generic question

No need for any long discussions on my account. I thought I had accepted my nomination there. Well, I obviously haven't, so once again: I hereby accept my nomination. <KF> 04:59, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)

Support

1. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 01:09, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
2. -- Grunt 🇪🇺 03:43, 2004 Nov 16 (UTC)
3. "Antonio Black Metal Martin" 22:33, 15 Nov 2004 (MST).....seven thousand edits, vandalism aware, seems like an excellent administrator to be to me.
4. [[User:Rhymeless|Rhymeless | (Methyl Remiss)]] 07:01, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC) I see this guy everywhere. To me, that seems like a good sign.
5. Andre (talk) 16:07, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)
6. —No-One Jones ^(m) 18:07, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
7. Acegikmo1 18:13, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
8. Of course. --Lst27 (talk) 00:02, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
9. Another great nomination by uc. uc's really on top of things! 172 06:03, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
10. Anyone who loves to fight vandalism can't be all that bad (Smile). Let's kick some vandal b--t!Tony the Marine
11. All your vandalism are rolled back by us. --Slowking Man 07:39, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)
12. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 08:49, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
13. - Amgine 06:10, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
14. Yes. func(talk) 19:25, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
15. Wolfman 01:41, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
16. All right, no objections. Everyking 06:27, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
17. /Tuomas 15:12, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)
18. Duk 16:52, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)

A. I would continue reverting pages in cases of vandalism and I would want to deal with requests for undeletion, having myself experienced on a number of occasions how easily articles (or at least stubs) which are worth keeping are mistakenly speedy-deleted.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A. I used to be pleased with my introduction to crime fiction before it was cut up and distributed all over Wikipedia. (Fortunately, whoever is interested in my original article can still access the old version. Generally, being able to do that is really one of the good features of Wikipedia.) I think the biography of Margarete Schütte-Lihotzky is quite good, and I'm watching over List of literary works with eponymous heroines because I believe nowhere else can one find such a list.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?

A. I had an argument with Maveric 149 ages ago about NPOV in Losers in literature (which has been renamed since). More recently, there was some dispute about the Gallagher disambiguation page, but both "conflicts" are hardly worth mentioning. Generally, I think it's a ridiculous idea having a nervous breakdown while you're all alone in your room in front of your PC. I'm not quite that peaceful in real life. <KF> 11:48, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)