Talk:Burlington Arcade

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shopping Centers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Category[edit]

I'm not entirely convinced that Burlington Arcade belongs in the Category:London Shops. It is more a 'shopping mall' than a shop. -- Chris j wood 14:17, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I wanted to have a review of teh decision to delete the article since it seems references have been added and I found some as well. It seems pretty notable based on an easy google search (tons of relevent matches). I'm not one hundred percent sure how to do teh formating on the page in order to do so. I'd be obliged if some one could help wiht that. Primarily I think this article is important because it has been merged to a correct 'London shopping centre' category and it is the architectural ancestor of the the modern shopping mall! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.187.190.88 (talk)

The above appears to be disingenuous. An irrelevant deletion review pertaining to another article was inserted at the head of this article. The article Burlington Arcade is not under review for deletion, needless to say. --Wetman 23:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest removal of gallery[edit]

I think that the gallery is not really useful, and adds little to the article. I suggest deletion.Jimjamjak (talk) 10:51, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]