Talk:Twenty-One Demands

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on January 18, 2009, January 18, 2010, January 18, 2014, January 18, 2015, and January 18, 2021.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Japan: History Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 18:11, April 23, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the History task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Military history: Asian / Chinese / Japanese

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force
	Japanese military history task force

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Old Discussion[edit]

One of our policies is that Wikipedia is not a repository for source documents. (see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not). Can we have an encylopedia article about this, please rather than just the raw text? For example, these questions could be answered: What was the context? What were the most important demands? Why was this significant? What were the consequences?

Thanks. -- The Anome 09:11 24 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Someone needs to summarize the main points. See statement above. --Jiang

An idea: relocate the source document to Wikisource and put the main points mentioned by The Anome in the article. (I will need someone more experienced with Wikisource and part of the Wikisource community to help me with this--thanks) Wikiacc 22:37, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I have found the Move to Wikisource template. I will be putting this on the page soon and moving it. Wikiacc 01:46, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Does anyone know the original text of this document? Was it English? In Wikisource the namespace for all documents should be occupied with that document in its original language. Wikiacc 02:41, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

A friend of mine (Profxyz) has just added it. Nippoo 17:16, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

clean-up has now removed source document from main article. It can now be found on Wikisource, where it belongs. MChew 20:55, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

pro-japan bias? "In China, the overall political impact of Japan’s actions was positive" I'm no scholar on this field but im fairly sure the Japanese intervention in China was negative.

"In retrospect, the results of the revised final (Thirteen Demands) version of the Twenty-One Demands were far more negative for Japan than positive, and it is hard to comprehend what the Japanese government was attempting to obtain. Without Clause 5, the new treaty did not give Japan anything that it did not already have in China." This still seems rather biased to me, and has no sources to back it up. - Renn, April 25, 2007

Because it is probably written by the japanese

New Discussion[edit]

Why are there so many missing verbs? "China to grant..." appears rather than "China is to grant..." for example. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.208.204.11 (talk) 16:42, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

demaich [edit]

The most prominent location for the word "demaich" is < http://demaich.com >, street address removed

This article is confusing.

I am searching f/ article twenty-one, article XXI, Treaty_of_Guadalupe_Hidalgo, & frustrated.

[[ hopiakuta Please do sign your signature on your message. ~~ Thank You. -]] 01:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]