Talk:2003 loya jirga

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2003 loya jirga article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Afghanistan Low‑importance

	Afghanistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Because of strife within the assembly, it was dubbed, by some Afghans, the "loya jagra" ("big fight").

Does this sentence refer to the 2003 assembly, or the previous one? The placement of this sentence with the previous one is confusing. DanKeshet

The U.S. held the power of veto over the entire document. Is this really true? It seems unlikely to me since the US never delcared fomal occupation authority in Afganistan the way it did in Iraq. Perhaps this is referring to the de facto state of affairs due to the US military presence? In that case this should be explained and reworded less strongly. Ddye 19:56, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I think the whole paragraphe Malalai Joya's Historical Speech can be deleted, since the remarks of joya are mentioned before. Does anyone disagree? Diedtc (talk) 16:53, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that this article should be merged with Constitutional Loya Jirga Diedtc (talk) 09:33, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]