Category talk:Humour

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles

Psychology

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles

Philosophy: Aesthetics / Ethics

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Aesthetics
	Ethics

This category was nominated for deletion on 7 October 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

This category was nominated for renaming on 10 June 2011. The result of the discussion was keep.

Possible move[edit]

To be consistent with the Wikipedia article humour, would not a move to [[Category:Humour]] be appropriate. Mintguy (T)

Perhaps better would be to switch the humour article back to humor, where the article started (it was changed, in violation of WP guidelines, some time ago). --Cultural Freedom talk 2007-08-28 21:01 21:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Include link to Category:Wikipedia humor or not?[edit]

I think we should, it's disambiguating, and it is humor. It's just a link. Go to image and there's a link to Wikipedia:image. Let's just put it in; it's not a paper encyclopedia, so there's no space requirement, and after all, it's just a link. --HereToHelp (talk) 02:49, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]