Talk:Dihydrogen monoxide parody

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dihydrogen monoxide parody article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 31 days

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:

June 19 to 25, 2016 (19th)
February 19 to 25, 2017 (16th)

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 April 2016. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Dihydrogen monoxide parody. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Dihydrogen monoxide parody at the Reference desk.

Short description[edit]

@DavidWBrooks: The Short Description was previously "Parody where water is presented by an uncommon name". I changed it to "Demonstration of scientific illiteracy", which was reverted with the comment "That's too vauge - doesn't tell readers anything". The goal of a Short Description is to tell readers what the general scope or topic of the article is, not to summarize the article. I would argue that the main topic is scientific illiteracy, not water and not uncommon names for water. The fact that it's a parody is already in the title, and doesn't need to be repeated. --Macrakis (talk) 19:05, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Although the words you used in the short description may be inferred from the article (and true)—being so esoteric, they just don't work for a fact-based SD. The prior was better; and re-using the word from the title is allowed and descriptive. GenQuest ^"scribble" 20:06, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, if "scientific illiteracy" is too esoteric (really?), we could rephrase it as "poor understanding of science" or "misunderstanding of chemistry" or something. But the fact that an uncommon name is used in the parody doesn't seem helpful in an SDESC. --Macrakis (talk) 20:33, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of the short description is to help readers find the article that they're looking for. I think the "Parody where water is presented by an uncommon name" is more likely to help a reader who's looking for "that thing when people get punked by an unusual description of water" than the suggested alternatives. Schazjmd (talk) 20:42, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Way[edit]

I'm surprised that this article does not identify the guy behind the current website. He is Dr. Tom Way, an associate professor of Computing Sciences at Villanova University. See [1]

I'd do this myself, but I'm a WP:newbie and don't yet have the confidence.

Thanks to anyone who can help. Bholtgren (talk) 01:21, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bholtgren In the Public use section there is this content: "In late 1997, drawing inspiration from Jackson's web page and Zohner's research, Tom Way created a website at DHMO.org, including links to some legitimate sites such as the Environmental Protection Agency and National Institutes of Health.[16]" David notMD (talk) 12:33, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I didn't see that. Thank you very much! Bholtgren (talk) 13:35, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The ref itself is a bit off-putting, but if one types in press and press for user and password, it goes to the website and there is confirmation that the website was created by Tom Way. David notMD (talk) 18:33, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hydric oxide[edit]

IP 68.2.138.130 added "hydric oxide" to the list of names for water in the article, and I reverted as "unsourced". The IP then offered this as a source for the edit. I cannot tell from the link what publication that source is from. I suspect it may be from Nature, apparently from 1897. The item in particular is a letter from an otherwise unknown correspondent, presenting what may be an idiosyncratic term for water. I do not regard that as a usable source for the present-day use of a technical term. Another issue is whether the term "hydric oxide" has been used in connection with the dihydrogen monoxide parody. I believe that a reliable source that states that "hydric oxide" has been used in connection with the dihydrogen monoxide parody is needed in order to add that term to the article. Donald Albury 15:57, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Verbatim[edit]

The part about Aliso Viejo exists verbatim on ChemEurope: [2]https://www.chemeurope.com/en/encyclopedia/Dihydrogen_monoxide_hoax.html 2600:8802:3A0B:3000:E956:DEF8:AF93:BC0B (talk) 21:30, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It copied from wikipedia. See the statement (small letters) at the bottom of the article: It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Dihydrogen_monoxide_hoax". A list of authors is available in Wikipedia. Schazjmd (talk) 21:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]