Elaine Paige is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Elaine Paige is part of WikiProject Musical Theatre, organized to improve and complete musical theatre articles and coverage on Wikipedia. You can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Musical TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject Musical TheatreTemplate:WikiProject Musical TheatreMusical Theatre articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
While I appreciate that everyone is currently caught up in the recent appearance of Susan Boyle on Britain's Got Talent, and that Boyle said she wanted to be like Paige, adding a completely unsourced paragraph on this to the article lead section is not appropriate. The lead of an article is supposed to be a summary of the article and the article itself does not mention Boyle. Therefore, it should not be covered in a summary. It also is a bit too much recentism and gives Boyle too much weight in this article. A featured article should never have this sort of non-sequitur addition to the lead, especially with no sourcing. LaVidaLoca (talk) 22:32, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Now Elaine Paige has acted; she has extended an invitation to duet with Susan Boyle. Boyle Gets Duet Invite From Her Idol Paige has thus related herself to the 66,000,000-view Boyle. Joefaust (talk) 15:22, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Why is Elaine Paige credited with having won 'The Society Of West End Theatre Award' AND 'The Laurence Olivier Award' for Evita? The two awards are the same. At the time of winning the award was called 'The Society Of West End Theatre Award'. It was subsequently renamed 'The Olivier Award'.
It would be more accurate to write; 'The Society Of West End Theatre (Olivier) Award'. Otherwise it is extremely misleading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.192.255.218 (talk) 10:59, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Guys, there appears to be a troll or animal rights fanatic adding an “animal rights” section to EP’s wiki page.
Wearing animal furs does not constitute an animal rights abuse. I have leather shoes but I don’t get labelled animal rights abuser.
They appear to be working from a few photos off Google images. This constitutes original research, which for good reason is not allowed as a source on Wikipedia.
TLC.82.112.128.124 (talk) 23:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure if it is intentional trolling or just a lack of understanding of policy. The opinion itself is not in itself unusual or disreputable but the original research can't be allowed. If there was a notable animal rights group singling Paige out for substantial criticism then some coverage of that could be justified but I have Googled (admittedly very briefly) and not found anything. I have tried to explain it on their talk page. Lets hope that resolves it. --DanielRigal (talk) 16:20, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"could be justified" is right. The real question is, is wearing furs a significant part of her biography? We can tell whether it is or not by coverage in reliable sources.
and from the photos of the OR, it's impossible to tell if she is wearing real fur or top-quality synthetics anyway.. But truth is not the issue. 99.104.111.76 (talk) 14:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, was I ever wrong in thinking that a polite explanation and a few links to our policies would put an end to it. What a pity.
As they seem to have found another IP to continue their disruptive behaviour I have had to request partial page protection. If that is accepted then it will hit all IP based editors equally, which unfortunately will include you. You might want to create an account, or log in if you already have one. I am sorry if this causes you any inconvenience. It is a bit of a blunt instrument. I hope we won't need it for too long. --DanielRigal (talk) 21:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously, that has literally never happened. Can't we remove it? ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 16:04, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"that has literally never happened": And how do you know that? I think this hatnote is supported by the guidance at Template:Distinguish/doc: "to inform the reader of the existence of one or more articles whose title(s) bears a strong resemblance to the current article." Note that there's a reciprocal hatnote at Ellen Page. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 23:51, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I rather like that hatnote (I actually came to the talk page just to say this), and on policy grounds too, it's a good idea to have it there. Airbornemihir (talk) 15:38, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Honest question, Should it be Barnet, Herts, or Barnet, London, as Barnet is now part of London and no longer part of Hertfordshire?
cheers. 2A02:C7F:C632:9200:E993:843B:4839:AC1F (talk) 17:51, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
