Happiness[edit]

Stuff I keep on this page, even though it technically scrolled off.

Did you know?[edit]

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Charles Rosher, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently-created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Ronald E. Neumann, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently-created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Archives[edit]

7/05/2004 - 8/5/2005 - User talk:Jrp/Archive1

New Stuff Goes Here[edit]

Guy Swope[edit]

Hey, thanks for the article on Guy J. Swope. He happens to be my great-great uncle.PierceG 21:27, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dvirgueza again[edit]

Hello. Yeah, I can see what you mean. It is becoming a real problem. If the user touches any of those articles we've been reverting lately and return them to his version, I will block him for a period of one month. I think it's the least that can be done now, considering he gives other users no ears whatsoever. One month sounds good enough to me. Long enough for someone to forget about things and stop kidding around. But that won't do much, since he's using sockpuppets and all. I think in that case, I should probably open a discussion about him on the Administrators' noticeboard, so that other sysops would get into it.

I'll wait until he goes out of line again, then I'll take that action. Better that way, or people might accuse me of being a fasty blocker. It has happened before.

About regular users having a "one-click reversion button", I'm not sure. If they used to have that, I really don't remember. I actually think that would be dangerous, since it would put admins and regular users in the same level when it comes to this. For things to stay stable in Wikipedia, I believe administrators have to always be a step forward. Otherwise, vandals win.

Thanks again for your input. If you need any help again, just send me a message. See you.--Kaonashi 23:58, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I see you posted something at Vandalism in Progress. I'm not sure that was a good place to choose, but hopefully, it'll be good for something.--Kaonashi 00:04, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Primary candidates VFD[edit]

Many of the candidates for the June 14, 2005, congressional primary have been proposed for deletion. I am writing those who worked on those articles to request that they offer their votes against the proposal. The VFD's can be found starting at Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Log/2005_August_8#Peter_Fossett. It is my view that we ought to provide a complete record of the election and my deleting so called "minor" candidates we do a disservice to them and the historical record. Please vote against all these proposals.PedanticallySpeaking 14:54, August 9, 2005 (UTC)

Re: Vandalism[edit]

I see that you meant to put that notice on Goku9's talk page. It's OK, no harm done. People like Goku9 annoy the heck outta me... -- RattleMan 05:49, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

high priests[edit]

I have absolutely no idea where the list came from. I would guess, if I had to, that it came from here. No idea the source for that. One would assume that the latter part of the list comes from Josephus, but I have no real idea. Surely some of them must be mentioned by Josephus. john k 06:43, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Everything I said is true,(Bird Studios) not Toei. Goku9 2-26-06

CfD: Wikipedians by politics[edit]

hi, i hope u don't mind me contacting u like this. maybe i'm misinterpreting the situation, or maybe i'm just a bit stupid, but i don't think the argument to remove is coming across clearly. i'd genuinely like to understand why you want them removed. if you have time, could you add more detail? Veej 14:06, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article James McClinton, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks[edit]

Hey, thanks for your support for the Tim Lynch article! You've worked on it before I even knew it existed, and I don't think it would be doing as well without you involved. I honestly think Lynch is notable enough for a wikipedia article, and based on an interview I had with him for a school newspaper, he is quite a remarkable guy. The editor who wants to see the article removed seems extremely biased, and downright malicious at times, it's a shame some people on Wiki have come to that! Anyway I just wanted to say thanks! Flypanam 03:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Lynch[edit]

What's wrong with the material on the novel character named after him, and the clarification that the characters from the movie and DS9 episode were not? I'd like to hear your POV on this. Nightscream 06:06, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I asked you the above question almost a week ago, and you never responded, yet now you're again deleting info from the article. Why is this? In what way does any of that info violate NPOV? Nightscream 17:26, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon Ball movies[edit]

FUNimation's dubs aren't the only english dubs. "Bridge Entertainment" has also released english dubs of the movies & they have their own titles as well. Does that mean that the pages could be named after Bridge Entertainment's titles (Example: "Dead Zone" would be "The Pursuit of Garlic"). The reason I used the translations of the original titles was because that way it would be more universal.Linkdude20002001 10:01, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Whittington[edit]

Hey. You removed [[Category:People shot by standing Vice Presidents]] from Harry Whittington with the edit summary "removing contradicted info on his religion, see Talk". I don't see how this could possible explain removing that category. The category is up for deletion, but it shouldn't be removed from the articles until that discussion is decided. Cheers, savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 00:44, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Third opinions wanted ~~[edit]

I'm going to various contibuting editors to DragonBall articles to receive help and third opinions on a dispute between Zarbon and myself on the List of Frieza Related Characters in Dragon Ball. And lucky, lucky, you just so happen to be one. ^_^ Any input/discussion on the matter would be greatly appreciated. Papacha 15:06, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Blanton C. Winship, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Gurubrahma 05:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Puerto Rico Governors[edit]

I would like to congratulate you on your articles of Puerto Rico governors. Excellent job. Also I invite you to contribute to Politics of Puerto Rico. Take care. Joelito 18:27, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Beekman Winthrop, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Edwin Taylor Pollock, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thomas Esposito[edit]

I'm curious about why you wrote an article on this guy. He's one of my neighbors. Do you have any ties to Logan, W.Va.? Brian G. Crawford 18:12, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saints Wikiproject[edit]

I noted that you have been contributing to articles about saints. I invite you to join the WikiProject Saints. You can sign up on the page and add the following userbox to your user page.

This user is a member of the Saints WikiProject.

I also invite you to join the discussion on prayers and infoboxes here: Prayers_are_NPOV.

Thanks! --evrik 16:40, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zen Kyo Shin[edit]

I was planning to put Zen Kyo Shin up for AfD, but I noticed that you had previously nommed it and then removed it. I don't see why it shouldn't be deleted. What was you reasoning? - Nat Krause^(Talk!) 23:11, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My reason for wanting to nom it is not really that it's not significant, exactly. The problem is that it reads like bad historical fiction. The author doesn't seem to be able to make up plausible Chinese names nor does he know very much about the history of Chinese Zen. There's nothing to indicate that this is other than a work of fiction. Since it doesn't say anything else about Zen Kyo Shin other than this fictional history, I don't see any reason to leave the article in Wikipedia. - Nat Krause^(Talk!) 04:28, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Joseph Wallace Oman, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Cactus.man ✍ 15:05, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK![edit]

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Benjamin Franklin Tilley, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Cactus.man ✍ 18:13, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK!![edit]

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article William H. Hastie, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your efforts! ++Lar: t/c 02:58, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Governors of the USVI[edit]

Good stuff! Thanks. --Gruepig 06:09, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK![edit]

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Francisco Portusach Martínez, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your efforts! As for Francisco, talk about being in the wrong place at the wrong time! ++Lar: t/c 20:41, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

On April 27, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Morris Fidanque de Castro, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Cactus.man ✍ 12:00, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

On June 10, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article William Swift, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Trek: New Voyages[edit]

Thanks for the notification, Joe. Frankly, I don't have an opinion as to whether the AfD should be closed under "keep" or "withdraw". While the clear consensus was indeed "keep", the nominator withdrew the AfD before five days was over. And if I'm not mistaken, the article can still be taken to AfD again either way. Regards, Sango 123 23:40, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

On June 23, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article William Reynolds (naval officer), which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--BRIAN0918 00:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your article, George Wadsworth (diplomat), was selected for DYK![edit]

On June 28, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article George Wadsworth (diplomat), which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! ++Lar: t/c 04:27, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

On July 5, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Norman Armour, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--BRIAN0918 19:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:The Broadway Melody Poster.gif)[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:The Broadway Melody Poster.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. meco 02:42, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First female cabinet member?[edit]

Your user page is the second Google hit for "site:en.wikipedia.org female cabinet united states", so I think it's worth getting this right. Was Frances Perkins not the first female Cabinet member? The current Anne Armstrong article only says Armstrong was Counselor to the President. Please consider looking into this and repairing your user page or the Perkins/Armstrong articles. Thanks, k.lee 18:16, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I need to review my source for that article, but Perkins was the first full cabinet member, yes. But other positions, such as Counselor to the President can have "cabinet rank", which is what Armstrong refers to. Or, so I recall from my research. JRP 06:44, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Herucle[edit]

I moved it back to its correct naming and I gave a word to the guy who moved it. WhisperToMe 22:57, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary for talk pages?[edit]

When I saw a bunch of recent changes whip past [1] in the article talk space, I took a quick look. Thanks for wikignoming the various bio/stub/tag info onto there. Can you toss something into the edit summary too please? That way it's easy to see when someone had already been there and fixed things. Thx. — MrDolomite | Talk 15:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Dragon Ball Canon" article[edit]

As far as I know, there are no official sources that go on to state what is "canon" and what isn't in the manga. obviously, fans have developed their own sense of what is and isn't over the years, which largely falls along the lines of "manga" vs. "anime and everything else;" Unfortunately, I don't know of anything you could really point to that actually spells everything out. Sorry I can't be of any more help...

Bureau of Insular Affairs[edit]

I just created Bureau of Insular Affairs, an article about the former agency that administered Puerto Rico and the Philippines from the 1900's through the 1930's. (Tomorrow or over the weekend I hope to create Bureau of Territorial Affairs which was the next successor to that agency.) I noticed that you had just the other day created a redirect from Bureau of Insular Affairs to Office of Insular Affairs, so I thought you might be interested to take a look at what I've written and please feel free to expand and improve. Regards, Newyorkbrad 01:43, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move of Hercule (Dragon Ball) to Mr. Satan (Dragon Ball)[edit]

Okay - Some users decided to request a move from Hercule (Dragon Ball) to Mr. Satan (Dragon Ball) - See: Talk:Hercule (Dragon Ball) WhisperToMe 20:59, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's happening again at Talk:Hercule_(Dragon_Ball)#Survey WhisperToMe 03:14, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I contacted everyone from the previous discussion who didn't vote in the second discussion :) WhisperToMe 04:06, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thumb wrestling[edit]

I agree with your deletion of this link. However, another editor does not. You may wish to follow up here: Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-11-29 ITWA. Rklawton 21:20, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Odet de Coligny[edit]

Thanks for the assessment. Can you think of a better infobox for it than the bishop one, or think of someone who could point me in the direction of one?Neddyseagoon - talk 21:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Master E.S. and Johann Rottenhammer[edit]

Aren't you supposed to leave comments when you do an assessment? Please do so. There is likely to be a long wait for significant expansion to ES, given no one knows who he was. Thanks Johnbod 16:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Star Trek: Of Gods and Men[edit]

I've nominated the article Star Trek: Of Gods and Men for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Star Trek: Of Gods and Men satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Trek: Of Gods and Men. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Star Trek: Of Gods and Men during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. --Slowking Man 09:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vote change[edit]

Even the dub DVDs use Mr. Satan? That's strange...

Anyway, thank you for letting me know :) WhisperToMe 20:45, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Slayer[edit]

Hello, i was wondering whats stopping it from getting A class? The article is well referenced, well written and contains all the information about the band, thanks M3tal H3ad 03:54, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

O right, i see your point, thankyou for the reply. M3tal H3ad 04:00, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Edward Magoon[edit]

Maybe some more research, and fresh feedback. Maybe the Wikipedia:WikiProject League of Copyeditors could help you locate and fix any prose deficiencies or maybe another general peer-review would povide you some fresh ideas, before going to WP:FAC. In any case, the article is definitely of high quality.--Yannismarou 18:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WPBiography banner on band pages[edit]

Hello, you have removed the WPBiography banner from King Crimson, U2 and AC/DC with edit summaries "removing WPBiography, not a biography of a person". Please note that WikiProject Musicians, as an integrated part of WPBiography, does use the WPBiography banner's flag "|musician-work-group=yes" which adds the following text to the banner: This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia.. Best regards, BNutzer 07:26, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Increase Mather[edit]

Did you have any suggestions about the articel, EG. how to improve it?, when you rated it? 68.39.174.238 11:17, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See DesireCampbell's talk page for why I did that move. (Me | The Article) 03:55, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SO, I'm guessing you want another Bardock vs. Burdock (Dragon Ball) and Hercule (Dragon Ball) vs. Mr. Satan cluttered-like talk page? Listen, I've been told more than once that not every single thing needs consensus. If that were true, we would NEVER get anything done around here. Besides, I'm not the one who originally closed the survey. It was another Wikipedian. Also, at the time, it was two against two and the other two didn't even give their reason why they disagreed with the move. Seriously, why is it and what is it that you disagree with the moving/renaming to Grandpa Son Gohan? (Me | The Article) 04:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When ya can, see Talk:Grandpa Gohan. Thanks! Power level (Dragon Ball) 00:58, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PL (DB) Comment[edit]

When you can, see Talk:Power level (Dragon Ball)#Okay, let's get these power levels right!, thanks! Power level (Dragon Ball) 19:12, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations[edit]

Congratulations for your work on the Charles Edward Magoon article, and that article reaching featured status.--Zleitzen 23:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I join in the congratulations and also hope a little editing I've done turns out to be helpful. If you want to work to improve the article even further, the New York Public Library catalog lists two books on Magoon: Gustavo A. Mellander & Nelly Maldonado Mellander, Charles Edward Magoon: Panama Years (Rio Piedras, P.R.: Editorial Plaza Mayor, 1989, 115 pp.), and David A. Lockmiller, Magoon in Cuba: A History of the Second Intervention, 1906-1909 (Chapel Hill: U. of North Carolina Press, 1938, 252 pp.). Best regards, Newyorkbrad 23:14, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FAR Protocols[edit]

When you submit an article to Wikipedia:Featured article review, as you did with Anne of Great Britain, please consider messaging the concerned projects and users, as written in the submitting instructions. I have done this for you in this case, but when many are submitted on the same day, it creates a lot of work. Thanks, Jeffpw 10:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I overlooked your FAR posts when I added my own. I do it first thing in the morning, while I am having my coffee. Sometimes I have to send out upwards of 15 messages, so I tend to try and work fast to get through it all. Jeffpw 15:02, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Freeza's men[edit]

Hey, would Zarbon and Dodoria (Freeza's men) be considered mercenaries? I'm askin' this because I wanna add Category:Fictional mercenaries to the bottom of those articles. What do you think? Power level (Dragon Ball) 23:41, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So, if I add that category to them and the Ginyu Force, is it wrong? Power level (Dragon Ball) 03:00, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I just wasn't sure about that. But didn't the Ginyu Force clear out planets for Freeza? Correct me if I'm wrong, but if it's so, they should be Category:Fictional mercenaries, right? Power level (Dragon Ball) 04:29, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see what ya mean. Thanks for helping me out here. I'm gonna hit the hay (zzz... zzz...) ... ... Power level (Dragon Ball) 04:46, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Photos of Navy officers / Edwin Taylor Pollock[edit]

Unfortunately, nothing comes to mind; U.S. military history really isn't my strong point. Have you tried writing to the Naval Academy? I would assume that they would have some photographs, even if they're early ones. Kirill Lokshin 02:54, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Benjamin Franklin Tilley[edit]

I think it will do alright when reviewed; image rationales, prose and refs look okay. -Phoenix 23:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin Franklin Tilley GA on hold[edit]

Good job on the article so far. I have listed a lot of things to be fixed, but they should all be pretty easy to fix. There are a lot of suggestions so the article is of very good quality when I pass it. Let me know if you have any questions or when you are done on my talk page. GA on hold — Notes left on talk page. Nehrams2020 23:52, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, obviously you should finish it as soon as you can. If you think it will still take a few days after the vacation, I can fail it now if you want and then you can let me know when you're done and I'll then pass the article (so you can bypass the long waiting period at GAC). Whichever you want is fine. --Nehrams2020 04:40, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I only offer that option just so we can help with the massive GAC backlog. Have a good vacation! --Nehrams2020 05:01, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA review[edit]

As the major contributor, i would like to thank you full your review of Bombings of Heilbronn in World War II, as well as your constructive critism. One question about that. You mentioned POPV. The Context section does explain why the city was bombed, and the German bombings of the allies. The inline citations, while quite common and desired, are not 100% necessary. Otherwise, I see where you are coming from, and I hope to soon improve the article to GA standard. Regards, —ÅñôñÿMôús _{Dîššíd3nt} 06:17, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Lebanon War[edit]

Hi Jrp, I tried to fix everything that you pointed out, but I'm sure that I missed some. I'd appreciate if you could update the review and show us where we still need work, so that I can complete that in the coming days before you issue your final grade. Cheers, Tewfik^Talk 05:03, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:TOSopeninglogo.JPG[edit]

Hello Jrp, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:TOSopeninglogo.JPG) was found at the following location: User:Jrp/STR. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Goku with Dragon Ball.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Goku with Dragon Ball.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:00, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bardock photo.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bardock photo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 12:59, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Star Trek Of Gods and Men.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Star Trek Of Gods and Men.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 22:14, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Dragon Ball: Curse of the Blood Rubies[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dragon Ball: Curse of the Blood Rubies, has been proposed to be merged into another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going to the article, clicking on the (Discuss) link at the top of the article, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. --Pixelface (talk) 14:27, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Goku with Dragon Ball.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Goku with Dragon Ball.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

USC&GS ships[edit]

No problem at all, they're interesting little ships and it would certainly be a shame to see them lost to a prod. Hopefully now we can get a better idea of their role in surveying history. Kind regards, Benea (talk) 03:36, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Harvard Extension School[edit]

Hi Jrp, I saw this article this morning and it read quite a bit like an advertisement so I edited out some of the fluff and it seemed some anon users had changed the GPA requirement that doesn't seem to match what is on the admissions website. I also removed claims that don't seem to be cited by independent sources and didn't really add to the encyclopedic nature of the article. Instead, it seemed as if the article was one giant plea to be considered the same as every other program at Harvard. While I don't doubt that the program is challenging, I would like to see some balance brought to the article and I noticed your previous work on it. The lead was completely to large, filled with fluff, advertising material and seemed to be at odds with WP:LEAD. Do you care to take another look at it? Thanks, --Ave Caesar (talk) 21:19, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Wall[edit]

Hi. I've responded to your comments at FAC. I should say that I recognize that this article isn't like most such articles on WP. But I do think there are good justifications for trying to do things slightly differently. Perhaps some of our differences rest on diverse interpretations of the word "maverick"? Meanwhile, I think that my comments to Carcharoth also try to address points you've made. In this light, I've also done a thorough revision of the lead, to better reflect what the article is actually setting out to do. Any further comments you had would be most welcome. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 08:24, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nantucket Lightship LV58[edit]

On 4 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nantucket Lightship LV58, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 13:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: Tilley[edit]

Thanks for the update. I will be interested to see if you come up with anything about the "master" rank since naval history is an interest of mine. --Laser brain (talk) 23:32, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See an example here: seems to be a rank used during and after the Civil War.[2] Trying to get a date on when they switched it. JRP (talk) 01:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work - thanks for creating the stub. I see the article has been promoted. Great work! --Laser brain (talk) 04:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ack! I thought I had actually supported, just saw your note and its been promoted. Sorry, this is what happens when I travel, a few things always get lost... I apologize! Ealdgyth - Talk 13:34, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Worlds End State Park thanks[edit]

	<font=3> Thanks for your support and comments on Worlds End State Park which made Featured Article today! Dincher (talk) and Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 23:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HES not Ivy League?[edit]

Ok, there are no good references calling HES ivy League? I understand that you meant that its not traditionally an ivy league institution but then again its not going for that. All it is is a continuing education program administered through an Ivy League institution. This is where I believe that HES suffers from a social stigma rather than a legal stigma. Most of the amnetities affored to College and GSAS students are given to ES students and they all earn the same accredited degree from the same University. Yet, no matter how much this is made known, the social stigma of it being cont. ed. will always hinder it from being seen for what it is. No other non-traditional program has this much of a stigma and pretty much ALL of the major Top 20 institutions have cont.ed programs. The program was never meant to be seen as equals with the College, by all mean, no. But it was never supposed to be a reject school on the other side of the Charles with little to no affiliation with the rest of the university. The school is very integrated, and offers more then what is made known by detractors. You should help the article as much as possible by eliminating false notions that its not what it says it is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Firstinline2009 (talk • contribs) 23:08, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First, this discussion should be on the article talk page, not on user talk pages. Secondly, Ivy League has nothing to do with academics or the quality thereof. The term references a specific athletic conference comprising eight schools - the only schools that rightfully hold the title, "Ivy League." --Ave Caesar (talk) 23:20, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uriel Sebree[edit]

Congratulations! Uriel Sebree is now a GA-Class article, which means you get one of these:

This user helped promote Uriel Sebree to good article status.

BATGIRL FAC[edit]

Hello, I need further comments at the FAC in order to move forward with the article. would you mind re-reading the FAC and responding to the comments I left? A new consensus could dramatically alter the format of Batgirl Barbara Gordon and her sub articles. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 23:14, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FAC[edit]

Don't worry about it. There's no strict time limits on FAC's. If you're going to be away again for any length of time though it might be worth mentioning it to SandyGeorgia though so s/he doesn't think its died. Its looking good by the way! Fainites ^barley 06:12, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Future collaboration[edit]

Hi Joe. Okay, after struggling with the idea of a special copyeditor's userbox (which wouldn't make a difference, I think), and the idea of helping copyeditors get some already-established form of recognition (which won't work at the FA level because there's only one, co-nom-ship), this is what I've got. The strategy I'll recommend to copyeditors is: brush up on your professional style guides and WPs style guidelines and naming conventions, read a bunch of old WP:FACs and WP:GANs, then look for current FACs and GANs that seem to need copyediting, and copyedit them. (Make sure the the nom(s) have got the message that the article needs copyediting, so they'll know they need your help!) If it's in your power, do what it takes to help the article pass, and then ask in return for a chance to collaborate on future GAs and FAs after the writer(s) know that what you have to offer is useful to them.

Does that sound like a good strategy? And...you're a good researcher and I enjoy biographies, would you like to collaborate on any future articles? (feel free to reply here) - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) 02:14, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The problem as I see it is that copy-editing is difficult in a different way than other Wikipedia work. It is very easy to do poorly and a poorly-done copy-edit makes a page worse, not better. We can try and stress guidelines, we can push manuals of style, and we can provide bullet points of common mistakes and how to avoid them... but even then I'm not convinced you can make a good copy editor without practice, practice, practice. Some people are even then more good at it than others. (Hell, I've written on Wikipedia for years and it seems I still need help!)

I'd like for copy-editing to be a larger part of the FA process, but since there are a dearth of good copy-editors that want to touch some of the crap that comes through, I don't think that's likely to happen. But your strategy of making that role more available to the process is a good one, but I wouldn't know where to begin to implement it. I need to think on what you've said for a day or two to see if I have any really good suggestions to offer.

I'm actually going to assemble a page of "reminders" for myself with all the copy-edit hints I've received on this article and my three previous FAs. (Charles Magoon, Edwin Taylor Pollock, and Benjamin Franklin Tilley) Once I have it written, I'll show it to you for additional remarks. Maybe it can be something useful to others...

As for collaboration, I'd always be happy to work with you again. The problem is mostly me: I'm not consistent enough that I know what I'm doing much of the time. But, I'd really and truly appreciate your help on the next article that I try and take to FA, whenever that may be. (I hope soon, but I don't even have one started yet. The Henry Minett article was going to be next, but that will be abandoned for lack of secondary sources. Hell, even the government of American Samoa-- I've been emailing their territorial historian-- doesn't know enough about him to make an article and he was their third governor. I may continue on Samoa figures, for no reason other than that it interests me, or jump to something else like the Polaris expedition. JRP (talk) 04:03, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly support everything you just said, and that makes me think I'm on the right track with this idea of using copyediting to fish for productive relationships. I'd like to see your summary of what you've learned; it will probably be useful for other writers. Please consider me for future collaborations; what I'm looking for in "payment" is being a "significant contributor" on GAs and a co-nom on FAs, and it's up to you to let me know how much work I have to do on articles you being to earn that. - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) 12:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of lightships of the United States[edit]

There is already an article on Lightvessels in the United States. Probably these two should be merged. I'm planning on moving most of the material on US lightships from lightvessels into the latter fairly soon. Mangoe (talk) 19:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats[edit]

Congrats on your well deserved star JRP. Fainites ^barley 22:35, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FA thanks[edit]

	<font=3> Thanks again for your comments - Forksville Covered Bridge made featured article today! Take care, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:11, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Future Trunks Merger[edit]

Hey, just thought I'd let you know that there's a survey here to have the Future Trunks article merged to Trunks (Dragon Ball). Your thoughts on this matter are welcome. Sarujo (talk) 01:08, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hands convert template[edit]

Hi, I like where you are going with the template to convert hands (unit for measuring horses) into inches and centimeters, but there is a need to tweak it somehow. In short, while "14 hands, 2 inches" for a horse that is 58 inches tall is certainly correct, the nomenclature of the horse world is two say "Fourteen-two" and write it out "14.2" We also get constant requests to explain what a "hand" is whenever we put horse articles up for GA and FA, and hence keeping a wikilink to the term, at least the first time in an article it's used, is very helpful. I am rather clueless when it comes to templates, so if you can figure out how to make a template say "14.2 hands (58 in/147 cm)" or whatever, (But how do I get rid of that extra parenthesis?) that would be helpful, if possible. I swapped the template in List of horse breeds for the way we are doing the conversions in other horse articles (as we get to them), but I left your edits in Pony as is for now (except for the reference to Theodore O'Connor which just looked too awkward). Let me know if there is a way to do what I am suggesting (we probably have to manually do the wikilink to hands one time each on each article, I presume we can't make a convert template to do that also). Thanks. Montanabw^(talk) 04:36, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your explanation makes sense, although it's kind of a bummer. I'm thinking that maybe what needs to happen is that the first time an article references hands, we may need to do it manually, something like this: "15.2 hands (62 inches (160 cm))" then later on use your template for all the whole numbers, 14, 15, 16 hands, etc... and when in-between, like 14.2, maybe use your template the first time THAT occurs and do it manually to have the decimals thereafter. Hm. No big deal for now, (a couple thousand horse articles to go through, templates everywhere won't happen any time soon) maybe I can run this past WikiProject Equine later on when there is time for discussion (most WPEQ worker bees are sort of busy right now). Montanabw^(talk) 05:00, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This most be a USA thing? Maybe you don't use centimetres daily. Just letting you know that in the United Kingdom, Europe and Australia too, 14.2 hh is ALWAYS rounded up to 148cm in measuring ponies. So none of your calculations to make it 147cm (actually its 1473mm or 147.3cm).[3] So here it is: 12.2hh = 128cm, 13.2hh = 138cm, 14.2hh = 148cm, 15.2hh = 158cm, 16.2hh = 168cm, 17.0hh = 173cm, so the height of horses and ponies is rounded up or down to these heights. And its always 'hh' when written down. 86.153.161.214 (talk) 19:02, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to this over on my talk page. This makes the conversion templates even weirder because standard rounding doesn't apply... =:-O Montanabw^(talk) 19:24, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retching Red[edit]

Saw your AfD and subsequent removal. Your note that I should have waited before the Review was closed came as news to me, last time I looked I thought it WAS closed. Retching Red has been deleted before and the process has been messy and confusing (in my humble opinion)[4], [5], [6]. Sorry if I overlooked something. ~~SIS~~ 02:20, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Category:Sinclair ZX Spectrum games[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Sinclair ZX Spectrum games, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Sinclair ZX Spectrum games is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Sinclair ZX Spectrum games, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:50, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advert Tag in Lycos Page[edit]

Regarding your note in the discussion page for Lycos, a short paragraph about the 2000-2004 period, explaining why the value of the company collapsed and the reasons of the decline in the market share of Lycos, placed before the fifth paragraph in Corporate Development part would do the trick I guess. Without such an explanation the article seems like a naive glass-half-full one.--Eleman (talk) 09:29, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dragon Power US Boxart.gif)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dragon Power US Boxart.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:21, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Wessagusset Colony[edit]

On 3 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wessagusset Colony, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 20:27, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ferdinando Gorges[edit]

Good catch, by the way, on those errant categories for Gorges. Although I contributed a bit to the piece, and knew Gorges never set foot in America, I hadn't noticed that someone had appended those categories. Regards,MarmadukePercy (talk) 19:42, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lucas20[edit]

I did not just jump straight to giving him a level 4 warning. I was using Huggle which automatically assigns warnings based on what other warnings are on the user's page. I was not aware it gave him a level 4 warning. If you have not already fixed it, I will go back and do it. RainbowOfLight ^Talk 03:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Wessagusset Colony/GA1[edit]

Are you going to fix the remaining issues? Ruslik (talk) 08:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Sorry for the delay. I'm not usuallhy this unresponsive. I've just been up to my ears. If I don't get it today, I will tomorrow. I have the answers to all the questions already researched, just I haven't had time to put them up. (Weston, for example, was arrested for the failure of the colony that "he" ran and for allegedly selling weapons which had been intended to the colony elsewhere, against English law. He admitted to the second, but Governor Gorges released him "on his word" rather than hold him or ship him to England for trial. He subsequently moved to Virginia.) JRP (talk) 15:34, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Leaders of the District of Columbia[edit]

Yeah it's a very weird fish. I wish we'd give it a state-like status just for our sakes. :) --User:Woohookitty ^{Diamming fool!} 05:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ray_Joseph_Cormier_(2nd_nomination)[edit]

Being the subject of the subject, I agree with your reason for your Delete. I am not happy with the article the way it is either, but COI prevents me from doing anything about it. I have to AGF in others. It is not notable the way it is written besides factual errors. Obviously you have not had the time to read two archives of discussion in the Article Talk or the old version at June 22, 2008, but please take the time to follow this link.

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Ray_Joseph_Cormier_(2nd_nomination) Peace DoDaCanaDa (talk) 02:26, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

correcting CANVAS problem[edit]

Since User:PJHaseldine did not see fit to notify you, please be aware of Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_March_11#Yvonne_Bradley. THF (talk) 14:34, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yvonne Bradley[edit]

Yvonne Bradley's deletion review is ongoing here.---PJHaseldine (talk) 15:44, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ambassadors to Iran[edit]

"The US did not consider Persia important enough"? C'mon! Are you serious? --GnarlyLikeWhoa (talk) 01:40, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AWB Edit[edit]

Thanks and good catch. Thats not an AWB edit just a mistake I made.--Kumioko (talk) 13:31, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:Orange_Belt.gif[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Orange_Belt.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Dream out loud (talk) 19:53, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Bugsy 1.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bugsy 1.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Blue Belt.gif[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Blue Belt.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 13:45, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FOUR[edit]

		Four Award
		Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work all through on Edwin Taylor Pollock.

--Dylan 620 (contribs, logs)^{help us!} 22:08, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Governors of American Samoa[edit]

As you are a member of the American Samoa Work Group, I was wondering if you had any interest in helping to create articles on the governors of American Samoa. We are lacking quite a few, and the project would go faster with more contributors. Do consider helping out with the governors listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/American politicians/Governors. Thank you and Cheers! Scapler (talk) 21:49, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Afd[edit]

The BLP Ray Joseph Cormier in which you registered an opinion months ago is nominated for deletion again. Would you care to comment? DoDaCanaDa (talk) 17:43, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Four Award[edit]

As a past WP:FOUR awardee you may wish to comment at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Four Award.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:27, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Jrp! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Victor Lindlahr - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:38, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Young Artist Award[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Young Artist Award, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Artist Award. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 05:32, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Victor Lindlahr[edit]

The article Victor Lindlahr has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable without significant coverage in independent reliable sources. None provided, none found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 05:35, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Tripod_Homepage.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Tripod_Homepage.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 22:39, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 days for ignoring image upload warnings. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

feydey (talk) 22:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|What the heck? I'm assuming that this is in error. I've not been recently warned about images and just uploaded one that I neglected to put a copyright tag on yesterday. I've been a wikipedia contributor for for six years with a number of "Featured" and "Good" articles under my belt, so I might have expected a bit more in the way of communication before you outright block me from editing. Please unblock.

In specific, I was warned by feydey at 17:39, 6 April 2010 about a missing copyright tag in an uploaded image. I was blocked without being given an opportunity to fix this at 17:41.
Previous "warnings" I have received which Feydey may have been referring to:
Several "orphaned" image warnings from October 2009 and May of 2009. Both of these were uncontested because subsequent editors of the pages those images were placed in removed them, so it was correct for Wikipedia to remove the orphaned images.
I was also notified in May and June of 2009 that several images of beltway signs that I had uploaded required additional permissions. I had that permission, but was aware that another user was working on SVG and copyleft alternatives to those images and so allowed the ones I uploaded to be deleted.

In both of these cases, I believe that I acted properly and am not a risk to Wikipedia. Over a history of thousands of edits, I have understood and conformed to the rules.}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Unblock handled by original admin

Request handled by: (talk→ BWilkins ←track)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

I didn't leave out required information deliberately. The only issue I am aware of is the copyright notice on the Tripod one, which I can fix with a copyright tag. I did not believe that any of the other fields were required. The Lycos one was just a re-upload of an image that was already there because I noticed that it was old. The other two I just did because I had downloaded the full-page capture software and figured that while I was in there I might as well fill out the "screenshot" fields in their infoboxes. JRP (talk) 21:20, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I, too, have asked Feydey to explain himself. You made your best effort to comply with a poorly-explained policy on your first uploads in three years, and for some reason he thinks this requires you be blocked for 48 hours? This is exactly the sort of thing some of us were afraid would happen with the fair-use policy. I am seriously considering an unblock if he doesn't respond by next morning US EDT (i.e., within 8 hours). Daniel Case (talk) 03:24, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An established user like this should know by now (several image warnings) how to upload images. By following the uploaders explanations they failed to add a license when they could have used f.ex. WP:IMAGEHELP - clearly linked on image upload page - to clarify the license before uploading. I will assume good faith and unblock the user and expect better judgment and actions in the future. Best, feydey (talk) 06:51, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Angelfire Homepage.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Angelfire Homepage.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 23:53, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Young Artist Award[edit]

I have nominated Young Artist Award, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Artist Award (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 03:38, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Artist Award (2nd nomination)[edit]

With your help, and (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL), I believe we can whip the article Young Artist Awards into suitable shape. You game? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:38, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Muh-hund-original-rondellliten.JPG‎[edit]

Hello, Jrp. You have new messages at Fastily's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:32, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Four Award[edit]

You may be eligible for further recognition at WP:FOUR feel free to nominate yourself for articles such as Benjamin Franklin Tilley and Uriel Sebree if you meet all the criteria.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:55, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 17:37, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Olivares[edit]

I see you've edited the article on the Count-Duke of Olivares. I posted the following on its talk page tonight and I'd be interested to hear if you have an opinion on this subject:

"I'm not an expert on the Spanish biographical articles by any stretch, but it seems to me that the majority of the ones I've seen don't include the "y" portion of the person's name in the title, e.g. it's Luis de Góngora, not Luis de Góngora y Argote; Francisco Goya, not Francisco José de Goya y Lucientes; Óscar Romero, not Óscar Arnulfo Romero y Galdámez; Enrique Pérez de Guzmán, 2nd Count de Niebla, not Enrique Pérez de Guzmán y de Castilla, 2nd Count of Niebla; etc. I think the logic is similar to the reason why we don't include middle names in the article title unless the person's middle name is widely used.

"So, by that logic, it seems to me that this article's title should be "Gaspar de Guzmán, Count-Duke of Olivares", not "Gaspar de Guzmán y Pimentel, Count-Duke of Olivares".

Thoughts?"

Adam sk (talk) 01:52, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI[edit]

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 25, 2010 -- congrats :-) Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 06:09, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Main page apperance[edit]

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on November 25, 2010. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 25, 2010. If you think that it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article director, Raul654 (talk · contribs). If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 07:13, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edwin Taylor Pollock (1870 – 1943) was a career officer in the United States Navy, serving in both the Spanish-American War and World War I. He was subsequently promoted to the rank of Captain. As a young ensign, Pollock served on board the USS New York during the Spanish-American War. After the war, he gradually rose through the ranks and served on many ships, including doing important research into wireless communication. Less than a week before World War I, he won a race against a fellow officer to be the one to officially sign over the U.S. Virgin Islands from the Danish and serve as the territory's first acting-governor. During the war, he was promoted to captain and successfully transferred 60,000 American soldiers to France, for which he was awarded a Navy Cross. Afterward, he was made the eighth Naval Governor of American Samoa and then the superintendent of the United States Naval Observatory, before retiring in 1927. (more...)

Lycos page[edit]

See Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Others.27_comments. In principle, one can delete inappropriate material (libel, off-topic comments, ...) from Talk pages, but generally people prefer to err on the side of caution. This is especially true when there is a real or perceived conflict of interest. If you think it is important to delete it, you might want to ask a neutral third part (perhaps an admin) to review it and delete it as appropriate. --Macrakis (talk) 17:48, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jrp. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Macrakis (talk) 15:22, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Carlile P. Patterson merger[edit]

The article has been proposed for merger with Carlile Pollock Patterson since July 2010; I propose to do so. Dankarl (talk) 18:01, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Fight Back! with David Horowitz, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bic and The Club (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Jeffrey Saad[edit]

Re: your message: There is very little worth massaging in my opinion. You are likely to throw everything out. No references, a personal opinion that read like an ad for a recipe book, needs wikifying, and some trivia. I recommend starting over from scratch, but if you still want it, I can restore it to your user space. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:19, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nicole Malachowski[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nicole Malachowski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. 64.134.70.158 (talk) 00:56, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Neko Majin, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Neko Majin" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 20:43, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FOUR RFC[edit]

There are two WP:RFCs at WP:FOUR. The first is to conflate issues so as to keep people from expressing meaningful opinions. The second, by me, is claimed to be less than neutral by proponents of the first. Please look at the second one, which I think is much better.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warren Delano Robbins[edit]

Hello. Thank you for creating Warren Delano Robbins. I was wondering if you could please inline your citation? I don't have a New York Times subscription, so I am unable to read the obituary and know which info to inline. Please reply on my talkpage if need be. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 14:44, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Drew McWeeny[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Drew McWeeny requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Az x2 01:52, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 29, 2016[edit]

A summary of a Featured Article you nominated will appear on the Main Page soon. I'll get to this one today. - Dank (push to talk) 14:52, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Precious[edit]

history and its people

Thank you for quality articles such as Benjamin Franklin Tilley, the First Governor of American Samoa, and Wessagusset Colony, a 17th century in Massachusetts, for supporting maps and at-a-glance information, - Joe, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:03, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Four years ago, you were recipient no. 1358 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:29, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed[edit]

Hello Jrp! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 20:20, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Drew McWeeny[edit]

The article Drew McWeeny has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NJOURNALIST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 23:34, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Harlan Majure[edit]

The article Harlan Majure has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP with no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 21:45, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Harlan Majure for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harlan Majure is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harlan Majure until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 17:13, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:UrielSebree.JPG[edit]

The file File:UrielSebree.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Edward Magoon at FAR[edit]

I have nominated Charles Edward Magoon for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. RetiredDuke (talk) 13:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary[edit]

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:45, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for E. T. Pollock[edit]

User:Buidhe has nominated E. T. Pollock for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Benjamin Franklin Tilley[edit]

I have nominated Benjamin Franklin Tilley for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 03:45, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:English navy officers has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:English navy officers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:08, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]