Talk:Russophone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What is the significance of mentioning Russians (in most cases sent as colonisers, which violated the international laws) "residing" in Soviet-occupied areas? Speaking Russian as their primary language clearly shows that they never assimilated into local cultures. 71.102.74.156 22:10, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Russian IS part of the local cultures. They've been together for hundreds of years!

-G —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.117.158.83 (talk) 06:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The map shows a particular region in North India as a significant Russian speaking area. Does anybody know what region/city it is? I am originally from India and am not aware as yet of any such place. Thanks! - Julyda4th

According to the legend, it is not significant area, it is a city with significant russian speqaking population. You may ask ask the author of the map to put more detailed info into the page with the image. `'Míkka>t 20:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, my bad! I intended to ask about a region with a 'significant Russian speaking population' and not a 'significant area with Russophones'. Thanks though! Julyda4th 09:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]