Talk:Cosmo and Wanda

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vandalism[edit]

I eliminated the slash crap some idiot added to this section. RugglesRugglesRuggles —Preceding comment was added at 00:33, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photo[edit]

I added a pic of Cosmo and Wanda smooching. It's from the episode "Lovestruck". This image was once here, but deleted for some reason. I hope I followed the guidlines correctly in restoring this image. It's a great pic and certainly belongs here. ~~Ruggles~~

Cosmo and Wanda Cosma[edit]

It is a good assumsion that C&W's last name is Cosma, bacause Cosmo's mother is called Moma Cosma, noting she is the mother of someone in the Cosma family (obviously Cosmo, it's been mentioned so many times before Moma Cosma is Cosmo's mom), and if it was supposed to mean "mother of Cosmo" it would've been someting more along those lines. --Wack'd About Wiki 08:19, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Your "good assumption" doesn't consider that "Cosma" could be her first name. --UsaSatsui 00:32, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that in the SpongeBob SquarePants episode Sailor Mouth Mr. Krabs's mom is called "Mama Krabs."

In the episode "the boy who would be queen", Cosmo was turned into Cosma, so his/her name would be Cosma Cosma if your theory was true.

Yeah, so I'm probably wrong. Sorry. --Wack'd About Wiki 09:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cosmo and Wanda[edit]

I added more comprehensive character info to the C & W section. -- Ruggles, Sept. 8, 2006, 9:22 pm

It's odd that character info on Cosmo and Wanda has been deleted yet there is more definitive info on the more minor characters. At any rate, I've restored the C & W character info. I also deleted some junk in Trivia about Cosmo disliking Wanda's advances. Those few times he's been evasive with her were due to his cluelessness rather than lack of desire. See the episodes "Apartnership", "Dog's Day Afternoon", "Truth or Cosmoquences", "AbraCatastrophe" and "Fairy Idol", among others, if anyone needs proof that Cosmo loves his wife. - Ruggles, Dec. 23, 2006, 12:42 AM.

Again, deleted junk that attacked the Cosmo and Wanda relationship. Whoever's doing that, deal with your feelings of past rejection and pent-up angst in some other fashion, 'kay? ~

(s)mother[edit]

Is this edit OK? It came from an IP address (apparently a Kinko's workstation) often associated with vandalism, and it looks suspicious. I know nothing of the topic. - Jmabel | Talk 18:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems fine. Its just a characterization of Mamma Cosma, and the one before showed her differently. I think its a better one. Mdesrosii 16:13, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Favorite Disguises[edit]

Favorite Disguises section needs to be fixed for grammar errors and misspellings. Person was either in a hurry or their keyboard was messed up... ChicanoJ 17:16, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Age[edit]

I believe that the age in the article is incorrect. In the episode "Apatnership", it is confirmed that Cosmo and Wanda have been married for almost 10,000 years. Also, in "The Really Bad Day", it is revealed that Wanda caused the extinction of the dinosaurs. This proves that they are both way more than 70 million years old. NGinjedi IV 14:40, 10 December 2006

  • Ya think the would have kids by now! Well, they might. My friend thinks she say a green haired Wanda and a Pink haired Cosmo while flipping thruogh channels, but duh it was the Yoo-Doo doll episode, I can't remember the name. -ILuvCosmo 18:58, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As the series show a lot of time travel adventures, Wanda causing anything anytime doesn't prove a thing. Sorry. --201.65.133.86 00:08, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Children?!?!?!??[edit]

Cosmo and Wanda have triplets when in the series???? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MudkipNDS (talkcontribs) 03:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

  • Where did you here that from? You were probably thinking about a fanfiction story.

Repeat[edit]

I've Noticed that in "Cosmo's Pet's" It mentions that 3 of his pet's were named after the adventures of Jimmy Neutron characters, which is said Again in "Trivia" Captain Eric 00:01, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beverage advertising character?[edit]

Why is this article categorized under Category:Beverage Advertising characters? Flashn00b 04:37, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:FOP Mama Cosma.jpg[edit]

Image:FOP Mama Cosma.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:36, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability?[edit]

Cna we please either see some actual real world content regarding the notability and importance of these characters, or else see a full redirect to the show's main article? ThuranX (talk) 04:59, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Super-Refurb[edit]

I have begun a project called the Cosmo & Wanda Super-Refurb. This will completely redo the entire article. Currently, it is the most cruft-filled article I've ever seen. I will begin by removing the 2 unneeded trivia sections. Next, I'll restructure the article to fit an out-of-universe style. The entire article will be different when this is over. Hopefully, this can save the article from redirection. Dylanlip (talk) 02:54, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]