Template talk:Infobox airport

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconAviation: Airports Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by the airport project.
WikiProject iconInfoboxes
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Infoboxes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Image Protocol[edit]

Is there an agreed protocol to use for the image and image2 variables? Should one be a photo of the terminal and the other should be a aerial view of the runway? Or is it more free form? I have some photos of general aviation airports and wanted to know where I should put them within the template. -Ichabod (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ichabod (talkcontribs) 03:29, 15 January 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Architect field in Infobox[edit]

Hi. I would like to propose adding the field of "Architect" to the infobox. For famous structures and buildings, it makes sense to cite who designed & built it. It is mentioned in most every article but not in the infobox.

For infobox_museums, it worked via embedding {{Infobox building}}, which has also got a few other architecture-related parameters, like |architectural_style= with this code:

{{Infobox museum|embedded={{Infobox building|embed=yes|architect=The architect}}}}
Infobox airport
Building details
Design and construction
Architect(s)The architect

Can we do the same for Airports? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nconcklin (talkcontribs) 17:11, 7 August 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

The meaning of grass[edit]

There are about 300 articles where the runway surface has been specified as "grass". The trouble is, grass is a redirect to the plant family Poaceae, and that's clearly not the intended meaning here. The closest things that I can see are turf/sod and lawn. Which one is the better target article? – Uanfala (talk) 22:03, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The better solution is to unlink grass, asphalt, and concrete used in airport articles per MOS:OL. MB 23:16, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's an option as well. And another one is to go the MOS:SPECIFICLINK route and pipe via something like Grass runway, which can be created as a redirect to Runway#Pavement surface (though the only grass-related content there at the moment is a brief mention with an example pictured). – Uanfala (talk) 00:44, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, in prose. But in the airport info box, the usage is Runway: and saying Runway: Grass runway is awkward/wordy and just piping grass is an Easter egg link... MB 02:29, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There's a similar thread at Template talk:Infobox venue#Grass as a surface in sports venues. – Uanfala (talk) 13:46, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are also a lot of runway-related links of the form [[grass|turf]], mostly within article prose (almost 460 of them [1]). Whatever we decide about linking in the infobox field will probably apply to most of these as well. – Uanfala (talk) 13:06, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A link to a general article on grass is not in any way helpful. It's a common English word, everyone knows what grass is. That being said, a link to an article on grass runways, how they're maintained and what's different than just a field, I'd support a link to. But just to grass or anything that's not specifically talking about runways? Nope. Canterbury Tail talk 14:57, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Such a specific article doesn't exist (yet?), though there's the redirect Grass airstrip (which I created recently), which points to an article section with a brief mention of grass runways. – Uanfala (talk) 15:45, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Base param[edit]

Base is listed as a param in the doc, but it doesn’t work. This would be a good param to have for airlines like JetBlue and Southwest that don’t have hubs but do have operating bases. RickyCourtney (talk) 21:14, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That parameter documentation was added in error. I can't find a record of this parameter ever existing in the template. Do you have a source describing the "base" for a few airlines? How many articles would use this parameter? – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:14, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Jonesey95 A good example would be Form 10-K for JetBlue which lists its bases on page 24, or the Form 10-K for Allegiant, which lists its bases on page 29. This information can also be matched up to the similar paramter in Template:Infobox airline. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 00:58, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 10 April 2023[edit]

It would be a good to have a param to have for airlines like JetBlue and Southwest that don’t have hubs but do have operating bases. A good example would be Form 10-K for JetBlue which lists its bases on page 24, or the Form 10-K for Allegiant, which lists its bases on page 29. This information can also be matched up to the similar paramter in Template:Infobox airline.

Please add:

| labelXX = Operating base for

| dataXX = {{{operating_base|}}}

Diff in sandbox: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Infobox_airport/sandbox&oldid=1149208086
Example in use, in draftspace: Draft:Oakland International Airport

Thank you for your consideration. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 20:11, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: Have you discussed with the relevant WikiProject(s)? Izno (talk) 18:01, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the suggestion. Adding a discussion topic for comment on the WikiProject Airports talk page. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 21:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Editors on the WikiProject Airports talk page were generally supportive of the change. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 22:17, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@RickyCourtney Could you make the proposed changes to Template:Infobox airport/sandbox? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:28, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Does this one I did earlier work?
Diff in sandbox: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Infobox_airport/sandbox&oldid=1149208086
Example in use, in draftspace: Draft:Oakland International Airport
-- RickyCourtney (talk) 15:49, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Izno (talk) 20:30, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just a question. How do we decide whether to refer to it as a focus city or an operating base? For example, JetBlue refers to them as focus cities in its 2021 Form 10-K. Also, for the airline's description of New York as one of its focus cities, it includes all New York–area airports, not just JFK. (Does JetBlue have a separate crew/maintenance base at Newark?) What determines whether we leave it as a focus city or call it an operating base for that airline? --Precision123 (talk) 17:54, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Best to keep this discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports#Adding "Operating base for" to Template:Infobox airport. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 12 August 2023[edit]

Following the recent addition to the infobox, please add operating_base to the check for unsupported params module call in the final line of the template. Implemented in the sandbox and will remove correctly-functioning instances of the template from Category:Pages using infobox airport with unknown parameters. Pinging @Izno: Wham2001 (talk) 12:49, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Completed. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 14:57, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]