Talk:Natalie Brown (singer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Authorization[edit]

The text information on Srub Records is authored by myslef, Jeremy Rwakaara of InMotion Mangement and is therefore NOT an infringement of copyright. I am Natalie's manager and am the author of that text as well as the text I placed on this page. I give permission for the text I authored for this Wikipedia page to be used. If someone needs authorization, I can be reached [email deleted] The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jrwakaara (talk • contribs) 07:44, March 30, 2005.

You are aware that all text on this page is to be released under the GFDL, as the copyright policy states. --LBMixPro <Speak|on|it!> 10:16, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Nataliebrown ACC cover.jpg[edit]

Image:Nataliebrown ACC cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:57, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Nataliebrown iwonder cover.jpg[edit]

Image:Nataliebrown iwonder cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:58, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Nataliebrown ltcb cover.jpg[edit]

Image:Nataliebrown ltcb cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Nataliebrown pub.jpg[edit]

Image:Nataliebrown pub.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Nataliebrown queenofme cover.jpg[edit]

Image:Nataliebrown queenofme cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Internal links: The clearup, for once and for all![edit]

This page had a few wrong internal links. I say this once and for all: "popular music" is NOT a synonym for "pop music"! Also, "contemporary R&B" is a complete different genre than "rhythm and blues". Why does nobody get this?--213.93.21.2 (talk) 17:16, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's rules[edit]

More references are needed other than the two awards -- coverage in independent secondary sources such as newspaper articles, books, magazines, as per WP:RS; sometimes music blogs can be used if they have a reputation for accuracy. Local newspapers can be used; please point us to local sources. If good sources can not be found, then maybe this article should be deleted as per WP:NOTE because right now it appears as if this article fails the WP:GNG. External links to music stores are discouraged as per WP:EL policy.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 03:14, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RS concerns[edit]

I reverted the stubify and plan to neutralize the language of the article as well as find WP:RS. I think much of the article's biological information is protected under WP:SPS as long as it is her own website and the mention is about her. Based on how it's written now, she passes WP:BAND criterias 1, and possilby 10. --wL<speak·check> 05:13, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]