Talk:Uniform Resource Name

Computing High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet High‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Telecommunications High‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

diagram in first section[edit]

The diagram confused me at first: it made me think that a URI consisted of a URN directly followed by (concatenated with) a URL. Perhaps something less rectangular would be better—a Venn diagram, for instance. Cup o’ Java (talk • edits) 18:58, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Illustration is important, lets try another illustration? --Krauss (talk) 10:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion by contradition[edit]

The article not explain the equivalence or distinction (or contexts for it) between URL and URN.

... And, most importante, just a "contradition feeling" while reading the article today:

All URN problems was solved with RFC 8141 in 2017?? The article have some opinion about it or there are sources evidencing the "usefulness of URN"?

So, suggest to express what is a concrete reality for URNs in the first sections, a any other encyclopedic description of an Internet Standard, and the opinions in other section as "criticism" or "implementation experiences", etc. --Krauss (talk) 10:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Syntax diagram[edit]

The syntax diagram added to the section Syntax was generated by the Railroad Diagram Generator using the following code:

namestring ::= 'urn' ':' NID ':' NSS (('?+' r-component)? ('?=' q-component)?)? ('#' fragment)?

based on the code in the box above it.

--Ennex2 (talk) 10:20, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DOCTYPE Puzzle[edit]

Readers of this page may be interested in thw following discussion:

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing#DOCTYPE Puzzle

--Guy Macon (talk) 22:37, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]