Talk:Gmail

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleGmail was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 2, 2004Articles for deletionKept
October 7, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
May 23, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 14, 2006Good article nomineeListed
September 28, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 1, 2014, and April 1, 2015.
Current status: Delisted good article

WATCH BETA SQUAD NOW!! (Also their footy match) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.24.46.41 (talk) 21:52, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Word "free"[edit]

I see that in the first paragraph, Gmail is described as a free e-mail service. This is only partially correct. Users with less than 15gb of e-mails can use it free, but people who need more than 15gb worth of e-mails have to pay. Should the word "free" be removed or updated to more accurately describe the service? 67.185.163.88 (talk) 00:10, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is a free service and the storage limitations are spelled out in the lede and subsequent sections. - Ahunt (talk) 00:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bigger image[edit]

The screenshot of Gmail website is too small to make out the details well. I suggest we upscale the image a slight bit so the text can be read. This will still keep the Non-free rationale as the image loses its purpose at this scale. RoostTC(please ping me when replying) 11:05, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The main issue is that there is a bot that seems to like reducing any oversized "fair use" images, so you may just end up back where you started. - Ahunt (talk) 14:41, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on 9to5Google as a source[edit]

There is an RfC at WP:RSN on reliability of 9to5Google as a source.[1] Only 3 opinions have been given in about 19 days. More would be appreciated. -- Yae4 (talk) 15:27, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 May 2023[edit]

149.11.110.20 (talk) 16:40, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to specify what you are requesting be added or removed. - Ahunt (talk) 16:43, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

notice object[edit]

NOTICE OBJECT flying off the handle hitting the Source. 114.75.51.76 (talk) 07:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jiv603567@gmail[edit]

My gmail hack haced password 117.98.114.106 (talk) 14:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]