Talk:Palatine Hill

On 25 August 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Palatine hill. The result of the discussion was not moved.

To-Do List[edit]

To do:

the Palatine hill in Roman times
the Palatine hill in modern history —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aurevilly (talk • contribs) 22:08, 18 August 2004
when exactly the palatine hill wall was built —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.50.228.4 (talk • contribs) 10:10, 23 August 2005

Palatine was not built, it is simply a hill that has been there for probably thousands of years. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prasenberg (talk • contribs) 17:54, 28 August 2005

He meant the retaining wall, not the hill itself. ♠ SG →Talk 18:14, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The curies links to a french family of scientists. The disambiguation page linked to that article contains nothing of relevance to roman times. Where is the article that should have been linked instead of the curies ?--Rootmoose (talk) 23:47, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

merging Palatine House[edit]

I read: "It has been suggested that Palatine House be merged into Palatine Hill", (added by Petaholmes) but I can not find here the discussion about it. Where is it? -- Pichote 20:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody seems to be that interested... I gave arguments to the writers here: Talk:Palatine House#Merge. Meaning: yes, merge and redirect. --Flammingo^Parliament 14:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree -- Pichote 15:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Visitors section[edit]

Of what possible relevance is the visit of some WW1 British pilot and his asinine comment about seeing some kid on the hill? This section should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.227.248.191 (talk) 20:25, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lupercal grotto.jpg[edit]

Image:Lupercal grotto.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When did people stopp living at the Palatine Hill?[edit]

Does anyone here know? The ruins are letively intact. One would have assumed that some people during the centuries would use the walls of the houses there and rebuild houses or roomd to live in (just like with Diocletians palace in Split, Croatia). --Oddeivind (talk) 10:24, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aventine Hill which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 11:04, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]