Talk:Monmouthshire

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Opening paragraphs[edit]

The changes made by A.D.Hope are, in my view, unnecessary and significantly worsen the text. I reverted them, but was reverted back. Specifically, the reference to the "administrative centre" being Usk is incorrect - Usk is over a mile from the council offices, and the town itself is not an administrative centre. The statement that "the county is sparsely populated, despite its proximity to the major population centres..." is unnecessary and odd. "Sparsely populated" in comparison to what criteria, or from what source? How is its supposed "proximity to the major population centres" (which ones? where?) relevant? Regarding the National Park, the correct name of the Park administrative area in English is now Bannau Brycheiniog, though the landforms themselves (which are not what is mentioned here) are still predominantly called the Brecon Beacons. It is also very odd, and unnecessary, to call a valley "hilly". Ghmyrtle (talk) 20:10, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't agree that I've significantly worsened the text. As it stood the county had a very short lead which only covered the basics, but it now has three brief paragraphs covering its situation and main towns, demography, and geography, and a history paragraph could easily be added. I explained why I included the details you mention in my edit summary, but I'm happy to repeat myself:
  • When the largest settlement and administrative centre of a county are different I list both, for completeness. The infobox lists the admin HQ as 'Usk', so I followed it. If that's wrong then then infobox also needs to be updated.
  • You've cut off over half of the first sentence of the second paragraph. In full, it reads 'The county is sparsely populated, despite its proximity to the major population centres of South Wales; it has an area of 330 square miles (850 km2) and a population of 93,000.' The 'sparse' comment is intended to be read in the context of the UK, so perhaps this needs clarifying, and it's notable that Monmouthshire does not have a large population despite being very close to Newport, Cardiff, and the Valleys, which are some of Wales' most populous regions. I find this approach better than simply stating the figures with no context, as a casual reader may not have enough knowledge of Wales to interpret them.
  • It's best to use the common English name for things on English Wikipedia, and the rejected move request at the national park's main article this April confirmed its common name is still 'Brecon Beacons'. While I'd like to use Bannau Brycheiniog, it isn't appropriate to do so yet.
  • Regarding the use of 'hilly', the full sentence is 'Below Monmouth is the hilly Wye Valley AONB, which stretches into England.' I'm using 'hilly' to refer to the AONB as a whole, rather than the Wye Valley specifically. It is slightly clumsy and I did search for a name for the range of hills on either side of the valley to use instead, but they don't seem to have one. Feel free to tweak it.
A.D.Hope (talk) 20:47, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is misleading and incorrect to state that Usk is the "administrative centre" of Monmouthshire. The main council offices are located at Rhadyr, outside Usk, but that is not the same as suggesting that the town of Usk is the centre, implying that it has the status of something like an old county town.
  • The area is not "sparsely populated" in any meaningful sense; as editors we should not make assumptions that text "is intended to be read in the context of the UK". Furthermore, the word "despite" should not be used. There is no reason why populous areas should not be surrounded by less populous areas - they frequently are. We could say something like "The area is less heavily populated than other parts of south east Wales".
  • I accept the argument over the national park name (though, like you, I think the article should be moved).
  • We should not use words that are both "slightly clumsy" and unnecessary.
Ghmyrtle (talk) 18:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, thank you for your help in refining the lead. I did make my edits in good faith, but I appreciate the criticism.
I can see what you mean about Rhadyr, but Monmouthshire County Council describes its HQ as being in Usk and the local press follows suit. On that basis I'm not convinced that we need to change anything.
In a UK context the county isn't dense, as it has a density of 110/km2 compared to a UK average of at least 270/km2, however the Welsh average is about 150/km2 and it's much denser than neighbouring Powys (26/km2). Given the ambiguity I agree that it's best to remove the phrase 'sparsely populated' from the lead. Having said that, I do think it's important to give readers the context that Monmouthshire is a rural county which is next to the most populous part of Wales, so unless you object I'll add that back in.
The passage about the AONB is tricky, as the range of hills around the Wye Valley don't appear to have a name and so the current wording is the best I could manage. Please, change it if you can come up with a better version! A.D.Hope (talk) 18:09, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see that it being "next to the most populous part of Wales" is particularly relevant or informative. Urban areas adjoin rural areas. So what? Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:56, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I try to include as much information in the lead as possible to help readers, particularly ones with no knowledge of the subject, and in this case I think knowing that Monmouthshire is directly adjacent to one of Wales' major conurbations is informative. A.D.Hope (talk) 10:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Historiography[edit]

I'm wanting to write a brief section of the historiography of the county, as a prelude to doing an article on the Gwent County History itself. I've put it here, under the title "Historiography". It could certainly have a different title, something that more clearly explains it's a history of the histories of the county; and it could probably also sit in Monmouthshire (historic), or indeed in both places. What I'm aiming for is, in summary, a section outlining all of the important histories/studies of the county, gathered in one place. I recognise that it has too-heavy an architectural focus at present, and I'll look to broaden it out; e.g. George Peterken's Wye Valley for the natural history; Rev. Davies' An ecclesiastical history of Monmouthshire etc. and there must be ones on the industrial history, the social history, etc. All thoughts/comments gratefully received. KJP1 (talk) 09:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Places of interest / Education[edit]

Following on from the above, I'm not mad keen on these sections. Places of interest is a bulleted list, with no discernible criteria, primarily sourced to Geograph. I could re-do it in prose, with better sourcing, but I'd still have the criteria problem. Why are Monmouth, Usk and Abergavenny listed but Chepstow not? Why are The Kymin and The Sugar Loaf listed, but The Skirrid not? The Education section seems very odd, given there is nothing in it but a re-direct. What is it trying to cover? Monmouthshire has no universities, as far as I know, - is that unusual for counties? Is Coleg Gwent HE and what sites does it have in Monmouthshire, Usk only [1]? - so you'd be detailing its major colleges/secondary schools? And why single out Education [see below]? KJP1 (talk) 09:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A model[edit]

Having now done a quick scan of the Principal area articles, Pembrokeshire looks pretty good as a template, and it is (the only Welsh PA?) GA. If I were to begin to re-cast this, along the Pembrokeshire lines, would that cause any concerns? KJP1 (talk) 15:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@KJP1, there is a discussion at WP:UKGEO that raised the idea of creating a guide for Welsh principal areas. Carmarthenshire and Ceredigion are also GAs. Did follow Pemb a bit when re-writing Wrexham (need to re-visit it), so seems using Pemb is a good baseline. DankJae 12:30, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DankJae - Thanks, I missed those two, though I still like Pembrokeshire the best of the three. But Monmouthshire is a long way off any of them! I think there's much to be said for a "generic" template, but I'm a bit tired of structure/MoS discussions/RFCs at the moment. I'd rather just write something. If Monmouthshire can be got to anything like the other three, I think we'll be quite a way to a de facto "style" for Welsh principal areas. KJP1 (talk) 21:48, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@KJP1, wish you the best with this article! I'll see if I can help, but I am at the opposite end of the border :/
Not enthusiastic over any "generic template" as I'd expect it would be "strictly enforced" limiting what articles can actually be about, and with three GAs under Wales' belt (plus Clwyd) it seems it is not needed, and how big and small the counties are. Plus considering most county articles are short to being with, anything added is an improvement at this point, whether consistent or not. Of course, if disputes arise then, and only then, would I consider a formal plan. DankJae 21:59, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely share the concern re. "strait-jacketing". I think there is a bigger issue about MoS/templates as a constriction that can inhibit editors from writing well about what they want to write about. On the specifics of Monmouthshire, however, I do think there's a discussion to be had about Monmouthshire (historic). Does it actually make sense to have two articles about what is essentially one place? Do other counties do this? Powys does, Radnorshire/Brecknockshire etc. but they are not strong articles, and is it the best approach? Sure, there are some "quirks" about Monmouthshire; essentially the "Welsh/English" debate that ran for about 400 years - and the fact that the present county is only about 60% of the historic; but I think that could still be covered in one article. KJP1 (talk) 22:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@KJP1, I'm of the opinion that they should be separate, as they don't share the same boundaries and were completely abolished. In England it is more common to merge them because historic Lancashire slowly became modern Lancashire with boundary adjustments overtime. But historic Monmouthshire was fully abolished in the 1970s, with the new county merely sharing its name. There is separate Denbighshire (historic) and Denbighshire, and Flintshire (historic) and Flintshire. Funnily enough this exact question is also being discussed at UKGEO somewhat. Just found it easier having separate articles, considering Newport would overwhelm the historic county in the modern day. But ofc, be free to argue combining them, but I fear the idea of a combined Denbighshire! DankJae 22:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Get the concern, but take, say, Blestium. Or Roman Caerleon. They existed a thousand years before Monmouthshire, in any form, existed, but they are both in what we now call Monmouthshire. So, do we cover them here, or in Monmouthshire (historic)? Or both, which seems a bit redundant? At the moment, we don't actually cover them in either. What to do? KJP1 (talk) 22:34, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The original argument lasting to today is here. And plus most principal areas are recent creations, so they'll have issues with their history most of the time.
@KJP1, In the end, it's the history of the area whatever the name or council it was under, and what's wrong in both? But historic Monmouthshire would be more on the county as it was, so between 1535 and 1974. This article is a modern entity so takes priority. Caerleon is in Newport, so not in modern Monmouthshire, and even in a combined article the "modern definition" takes priority, so Caerleon would be at Newport not here, unless it is relevant to a wider context. DankJae 22:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not to lecture, but this article and any combined article will have the modern county as the main subject (i.e. for geography, economy, transport), with the historic county largely just a section under its "history". It would be confusing to state Newport is in Monmouthshire, but not Monmouthshire essentially. Like how Lancashire only discusses Liverpool in a historic context, while having sentences like "in modern Lancashire...., but in historic Lancashire.... etc". DankJae 22:46, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

God! - Caerleon's in Newport now (it is)? I really am showing my age. I think we are in complete agreement on the principle. Monmouthshire, as the present county, should have the bulk of the Monmouthshire history - but not including Isca Augusta which now belongs to Newport! Monmouthshire (historic) should cover the 400-odd years of it's existence - so here we would have a section on 1535-1974 with a

Main article: Monmouthshire (historic)

. Let me see what I can do. KJP1 (talk) 22:56, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

God! - Caerleon's in Newport now (it is)?, to the horror of the locals. DankJae 23:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are providing a reminder of another long, and painful, debate where I was in the wrong over the location of Tredegar House. It is in Newport, indisputably, but the late, lamented John Newman chose it as the cover image of his Monmouthshire Pevsner. Why he couldn't have used Raglan Castle I shall never understand. KJP1 (talk) 23:14, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contents

1 Settlements
2 Geography
2.1 Climate
2.2 Geology
2.3 Coastline and landscape
2.4 Biodiversity
3 History
3.1 Roman period
3.2 Sub-Roman period
3.3 Norman period and Middle Ages
3.4 Tudor and Stuart periods
3.5 18th and 19th centuries
3.6 20th century
4 Demography
4.1 Population
4.2 Language
4.3 Religion
4.4 Ethnicity
5 Governance, politics and public services
6 Transport
7 Economy
7.1 Agriculture
7.2 Fishing
7.3 Mining
7.4 Oil, gas and renewable energy
7.5 Tourism
8 Culture
8.1 Flag
8.2 Built heritage
8.3 The arts and media
8.4 Sport and leisure
9 Notable people
10 Education and health
11 See also
12 Notes
13 References
14 Further reading
15 External links

Sources[edit]

KJP1 (talk) 17:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

  • If you're re-doing the article, I'll hold off my efforts like at Torfaen and Vale of Glamorgan of adding three images to the infobox per WP:WLSCOUNTYCOLLAGE. And open a discussion here to choose them unless the current one image should be maintained, unless you already have ideas? If you're local, I'd respect your preference! DankJae 17:59, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DankJae - Seriously, delay nothing. I have absolutely no strong views on IB images, and would be interested in options for multiples. It's obviously very hard to "capture" a county/area in one. Monmouthshire's Kymin view is beautiful, but it's not the entirety of Monmouthshire. As to whether I'm local - that's a question I've thought about for quite a while. I've not lived there for 40 years, and I now live futher away from it than I ever have. But I spent my childhood/young adulthood there, and for me, it still has the pull of "home". And I do love the "little places of a shy county". KJP1 (talk) 22:03, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah right, even if not local, you should have a deeper understanding of what best represents it. I just go with a mix of either "most known element/industry" or "geographic representation" (a image from each part of the county and/or if known for hills, show hills, known for coast, show coast etc). I would likely add some image of hills (possibly met with current image) or the Wye Valley as one contender. And ofc, of the best images that can be found. But am slowly doing the valleys ones so it may be a bit. DankJae 22:07, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@KJP1, note, county flags are also being discussed at UKGEO lol, with arguments being made for their removal from the infobox or the article entirely. DankJae 22:48, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh dear god. KJP1 (talk) 23:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And having seen that discussion, it is an good example as to why I'm not keen on RfCs. I think I will just put the flag in and see what transpires. KJP1 (talk) 23:47, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Transport questions[edit]

Railway stations in Monmouthshire[edit]

So, we have:

And what/anything else? KJP1 (talk) 09:21, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, MCC confirms there are only 4. KJP1 (talk) 09:47, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Motorways[edit]

Next question. We (don't) have the M50? I think Junction 4 (its end) is around Goodrich, Herefordshire. Assuming that's right, does that just leave:

Anything else? KJP1 (talk) 09:47, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just those for motorways, yes. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:56, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sport questions[edit]

Help! I know very little about sport. I was going to ask User:Kosack for advice but sadly they seem to have left. I can cover Chepstow Racecourse; I can do something on golf courses; although is there much notable beyond the Rolls at The Hendre? I can do something on rowing at Monmouth around Monmouth Rowing Club. But what about rugby, football, cricket? Do any of these have anything really notable to record. We have

What am I missing, if anything? KJP1 (talk) 13:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the golf course at St Pierre might be notable, as is that at the Celtic Manor? Martinevans123 (talk) 13:24, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An eagle for St Pierre, but not for Celtic Manor, which DankJae will tell me is in Newport. Remembering Tredegar House, I know you and I can recall the days when Monmouthshire's sway held west of Newport, and north into the Valleys, but we need to get with the programme! KJP1 (talk) 13:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lol. If it wasn't for the views of Monmouthshire, no one would bother playing at the Celtic Manor... when I was born there it was the Lydia Beynon Maternity Hospital and it was still in the county!! Martinevans123 (talk) 13:58, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At least if you take in the views of Monmouthshire across the River Usk, you don't have to look at the Celtic Manor. It was almost worth losing Tredegar House, not to have that in the county. KJP1 (talk) 14:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Although, on a notability point, CM does seem to have rather knocked St Pierre into the shade. It doesn't seem to have hosted anything major since the 1990s. KJP1 (talk) 14:03, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Money talks, apparently... Martinevans123 (talk) 14:05, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Martinevans123 - if you have a little time, you couldn't find me a few music references? I've just added Rockfield Studios to the Culture section, but I need suitable cites for the bands. If you can't find the ones I've chosen, just swap them out with others. You will be a much better judge than I as to who the most notable are. Many thanks. KJP1 (talk) 14:17, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's a very long list, haha. The person who probably had the most notable connection was Dave Edmunds, who really kicked it all off. But I'll have a look. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:28, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think Bohemian Rhapsody must be worth a mention. Even I've heard of that. KJP1 (talk) 14:37, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wentwood is part of Newport these days?? Is nothing sacred! Martinevans123 (talk) 09:24, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And Goldcliff, Newport! Which I think makes you a Newport lad, rather than a Monmouthshire boy! I'd wanted the Mesolithic footprints but have had to resort to a footnote. KJP1 (talk) 11:41, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I somehow suspect that all of the farms in Nash, Goldcliff, Whitson, Redwick, Bishton, etc. consider themselves to be still part of Monmouthshire, rather than part of Newport. But it's always been a bit marginal, I guess... Martinevans123 (talk) 11:51, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wentwood is shared between Newport and Mons - good write-up for Monmouthshire woodlands in Oliver Rackham's posthumously published tome on SE Wales. Geopersona (talk) 19:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History question[edit]

So, I am soon going to hit the issue of how/where the 16th-20th century history of Monmouthshire is best covered. The problem is that, as Robert McCloy almost said (see lead), "No county has been so b*ggered about with in the 20th century as Monmouthshire". So, I think the issue is something like:

  • History to 1535 - I think that can be covered here, as Monmouthshire didn't exist, although things like the Marcher lordship of Monmouth did, so we are really covering the area;
  • 1535-1974 - here we are in Monmouthshire (historic) territory. But when I look at that article, what it really is, is a history of local government in the county. There's lots on the commotes/hundreds/boroughs/county town/county council etc. And a great deal on the Welsh/English status debate. But nothing on, for example, the social history / industrial revolution and mining (huge in northwest Monmouthshire [historic, not now]) / the Chartist trial / Lady Llangattock and Welsh culture / the Wye Tour / national-local political history (Beaufort/Morgan rivalry etc) / military (Raglan Castle in the Civil War) / and on and on. So is Monmouthshire (historic) really just about the local politics/government?
  • 1974-1996 - Gwent (county) - this, short, article is totally about the local governance.
  • 1996-present - Monmouthshire, but only the 60% odd that it now comprises - so no Blaenau Gwent, Caerphilly County Borough, Newport or Torfaen.

I'm really not sure how to go about this. As an example, Chartism is important in the 19th century history of Monmouthshire, and it crosses our current boundaries, of both time and place, - Westgate Hotel for the insurgency / Shire Hall, Monmouth for the trial. I really don't think I cannot mention it, in a page that purports to be a comprehensive article on Monmouthshire. Is this a Welsh-specific issue? Denbighshire has a separate Denbighshire (historic) article, but Pembrokeshire doesn't. Dorset, the only FA on an English, or Welsh, county as far as I can see, definitely doesn't, which it doesn't need as its governance/boundaries have not been so interfered with as those in Wales, from 1535-1996. The more I puzzle, the more I wonder if the bulk of the history should be covered here, with Monmouthshire (historic) and Gwent (county) covering the local governance aspects, which broadly reflects the current reality. Sincere apologies for the length of the post. I'd be very interested in other editors' thoughts. KJP1 (talk) 15:58, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt everything can be included in major detail, so just write as much for each period, and if its too long, split and summarise to the historic county and/or other articles. So some mention could be here, but the detail be at another article if its too long. Because if an event occurred in Newport, makes sense it is also there too. In the end, the information can be both here, Newport, and at the historic article, as it is more beneficial to include it than not.
There have been some separate historic county articles since 2006, per this reasoning. England follows the approach that historic counties do not exist in the modern day, so don't discuss them too much overall. But it seems this separation has never been discussed. DankJae 13:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Climate[edit]

Use Dorset. KJP1 (talk) 15:03, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles to link[edit]

History
Geography
Governance
Economy - Mining (but how best to cover it, esp. as most isn't in "current" Monmouthshire, except Wye Valley/Dean?)
Transport
Culture - Built heritage
Culture - Sport and leisure
Other

KJP1 (talk) 07:09, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's missing?[edit]

  • History needs filling out, when I can unearth the Gwent County History;
  • Geology;
  • Notable people? Pembrokeshire has it, Carmarthenshire/Ceredigion don't;
  • What else?

KJP1 (talk) 12:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Under "Sport and leisure" you might want to mention Otter Hole? (I did it myself "some years ago", and I can confirm it was extremely muddy.) Martinevans123 (talk) 12:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Martinevans123 - Having read the description, I think I would term it Bloody terrifying, but then I have a strong aversion to enclosed spaces! KJP1 (talk) 13:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not very developed vertically... which is just as well, as otherwise you might get the odd racehorse falling in! But it means you don't need much tackle. It's unique in the UK, I think, as it's possible to also get trapped by the tide! I think it's also the only explorable cave in Monmouthshire; Ogof Agen Allwedd is near Llangattock in Powys. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In terms of notable people, there was a short dispute at Conwy County Borough, with some added for no clear reason, then was argued that either all notable people should be included or none. So having "notable people" would need some selection criteria, so are there some individuals that are regarded as very important to the entire county not just one place in the county? I believe that is what Pembrokeshire does, somewhat, with sources, but may be too difficult to decide, so may be why Carmarthenshire and Ceredigion don't. DankJae 12:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Martinevans123/DankJae - I should have thought more before starting this discussion in two places! I agree over "Notables" - they can be like school alumni lists, and I think I can weave mention of the most notable figures into the History section. On a related point, I should flag up the Historiography section. I suspect it's the only county survey in Wales or England that has such a section, and it's only there coz I have a nerdish interest in the topic. Is it really warranted, or should I fold it into the Gwent County History article I have yet to write? I like Otter Hole, of which I'd never heard, but think I shall weave that into the Geology section, which I'm hoping to persuade someone else to write! KJP1 (talk) 13:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That someone is up for it - interestingly Otter Hole has been on my radar though am undecided whether to entertain an entry - caves whose entrances remain open at all stages of the tide seem preferable. The excellent Cambrian Caving Council website (CCC is now Caving Wales, I learn) contains all location details for Mons caves at https://www.cambriancavingcouncil.org.uk/registry/CCRm.htm Geopersona (talk) 18:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great source! How many are there? You should definitely give Otter a go, but you might have go at an odd time, to fit between tides. It's not a long trip, just a muddy one. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fourteen or so in the vicinity of the Wye, then a host of them around the Clydach gorge and Gilwern Hill - perhaps another fifty or so. Of varying lengths though the list does include the likes of Draenen with its 70+km of passage and the resurgence for Daren Cilau. Geopersona (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Haha. I've done (a very modest part of) Daren Cilau, but had assumed it was it Powys (well Brecknock anyway!) Caves don't respect county boundaries, of course. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've prepared a new geological map of the modern county using Adobe Illustrator, similar in style to the one currently presented but showing the geology only within the confines of the boundary as it now stands. I could upload it but have always struggled with understanding copyright issues if wanting to upload material onto Wikimedia. The map is redrawn from BGS material as featured at https://geologyviewer.bgs.ac.uk/ - it seems to fall into OGL - there is info on re-use at https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/ cheers Geopersona (talk) 07:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Geopersona - Many thanks indeed. I’m very grateful for the effort you’ve gone to in redrafting. Although I appreciate it’s a complex area, I think the copyright position should be fine, under the British Gov.s’s Open Licence. That allows use and adaptation. And I am very confident that someone from Commons will tell us if there is an issue. Can I suggest you upload, and we see if there is any push-back? KJP1 (talk) 09:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Monmouthshire&oldid=1220527005"