User talk:205.118.4.98

You can redirect a page to another by using the syntax "#redirect [[another page]]" on a page you wish to be a redirect. Also:

Warning: Boilerplate text follows.

Hello there! Welcome to Wikipedia! We've noticed that you've been making some great additions to the Wikipedia and we really appreciate it. Why not create an account and stay awhile? The Wikipedia can use as many quality members as possible. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page and experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Hope to see you around for a long time to come! -- Grunt (talk) 19:58, 2004 Aug 25 (UTC)

Rollins Band substubs

Hi. While your contributions are certainly welcome, they are in desperate need of content. I've redirected them to the main Rollins Band article for the time being. Please feel free to expand them beyond mere substubs. Remember: You're contributing to a general reference work which requires a certain amount of minimum content per article. Drop me a howdy on my talk page if you have any questions. I encourage you to create a user account as well. It's fast, free, easy and a whole lot of fun since you receive a lot of privileges in return. - Lucky 6.9 16:40, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Joseph Smith

Great addition to Joseph Smith, Jr.! Thanks for helping out. I hope you register and stay a long time. But if you continue to make such indisputably positive improvements, your anonymous status should not be a hindrance to you. Tom - Talk 17:29, Nov 11, 2004 (UTC)

Good correction

I appreciate the wording change on Velikovsky (from "outright" to "overwhelmingly") since indeed many (though still a small minority) of scientists (as well as professional historians) are in general agreement with his theories.

Great edits to Public Image Ltd..

Get an account, man. Auto movil 17:46, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! jni 07:08, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

Nice corrections on Project Monarch; they really improve the article. I echo what others have said; you should strongly consider making a user account. -- Antaeus Feldspar 19:39, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

Romeo Void - where'd you get the quote?

"it's Debora Iyall's teasing, existential musings ..." as you put it there. Who is the critic? Fantailfan 00:13, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Interplanetary Phenomenon Unit

I have nominated Interplanetary Phenomenon Unit, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interplanetary Phenomenon Unit. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? - Eldereft (cont.) 16:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Fund for UFO Research

I have nominated Fund for UFO Research, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fund for UFO Research. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ScienceApologist (talk) 17:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Jame Gumb for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jame Gumb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jame Gumb(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sottolacqua (talk) 13:29, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Paranormal and occult hypotheses about UFOs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paranormal and occult hypotheses about UFOs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paranormal and occult hypotheses about UFOs (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 21:15, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Valeom/Paranormal and occult hypotheses about UFOs

User:Valeom/Paranormal and occult hypotheses about UFOs, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Valeom/Paranormal and occult hypotheses about UFOs and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Valeom/Paranormal and occult hypotheses about UFOs during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. LuckyLouie (talk) 17:10, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Oren Bloedow

The article Oren Bloedow has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:31, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Fund for UFO Research for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fund for UFO Research is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fund for UFO Research (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Star Mississippi 15:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Branton Files for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Branton Files is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Branton Files until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SparklingSnail (talk) 20:49, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Francis Dolarhyde for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Francis Dolarhyde is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Dolarhyde until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spinixster (chat!) 02:58, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

---