Talk:James Baldwin (disambiguation)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fame[edit]

Isn't the writer James Baldwin (writer) sufficiently more famous that his article should be at James Baldwin and the disambiguation at James Baldwin (disambiguation)? -- Jmabel | Talk 23:38, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Being bold. Distingué Traces (talk) 00:37, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No (until evidence is used to support this). There are a lot of JBs so he'd need to be more commonly sought than any of the others. Is that supported by Google hits, page views etc.? Boleyn (talk) 08:19, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's perfectly all right as it is. All JBs are easily accessed. That is sufficient. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 13:47, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fame 2[edit]

Why there is not an article about the actor James Baldwin? --Manfariel (talk) 13:43, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]