Talk:Poisson's equation

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale.

Physics High‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Where is the solution[edit]

No Poisson solution in this site?

more applications[edit]

other applications include image processing. e.g. filtering light and shade effects from sequences of pictures. see: http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/course/2006/csip/iccv01.pdf

There should be something about how Poisson's equation is used as del-squared-phi=4(pi)G(rho) to compute gravitational forces in the universe, as an alternative to Newton's inverse-square law of gravitation. Phi is the potential field, and one gets to the force per unit mass (mass of the earth, say) by calculating -del(phi). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.12.27.202 (talk) 12:10, August 23, 2007 (UTC)

Relating the general equation to the application areas[edit]

In each section, e.g. Newtonian Gravity, Electrostatics, etc., symbols and terms need to be defined relative to the original statement of the equation. For example, in the context of gravity, the original Δφ=f or ∇²φ=f looks odd and causes confusion. That f is not force but a source term should be immediately explained, and any other terms needed if following the link to the discussion of Gauss's Law. Rlshuler (talk) 17:12, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Date of publication[edit]

Instead of the 1823 paper mentioned in the references, we should mention the first paper in 1813: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k1053608v/f12 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:861:5241:2BC0:C451:5220:DC04:4602 (talk) 17:03, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]